DID JUSTIN HAVE FULL ACCESS TO GOSPELS?
Jesus Christ reputedly died and rose again in the thirties of the first century. A Christian, called Justin Martyr wrote in defence of the Christian religion in the century after. Justin's writings are used in defence of the Christian claim that Jesus really existed as the four gospels say.
Justin gives some details from the life of Christ that are similar to the Gospel of Matthew in the Dialogue with Trypho.
Trypho was an able Jewish opponent of Christian "truth" and as he asserted that there was no historical data about Jesus the scribes of Justin's writings added in gospel stories to make him look like a liar.
Justin's version of the visit of the magi says Jesus was
born in a cave and that the magi came from Arabia and learned from the elders of
the Jews that the messiah was to be born in Bethlehem and he says that Joseph
was told to keep Mary as his wife for her unexpected pregnancy was down to God.
And he speaks of the flight of the Joseph and Mary and baby Jesus to Egypt. He
says like Matthew that the massacre of the Innocents by King Herod who wanted to
find and kill the Christ child was prophesied by Jeremiah. The differences
suggest that he was not using Matthew at all. It could well be that this book
was a source for Matthew’s gospel.
It is important that Justin is only close to the gospel story in its most
dubious claims, the nativity, the entry into Jerusalem and the baptism in the
Jordan. Even if he really wrote about these things he showed credulity and
anyway he was writing too long after the events to be used as backup for the
Christian story.
Justin did not know of the extremely basic apostolic and New Testament doctrine
originated by Jesus that there was no salvation without explicit faith in Christ
for he thought that Socrates and Heraclitus, pagan Greek philosophers, were
redeemed in the blood of Christ and were in Heaven. Anything he says then is to
be taken with a pinch of blessed salt unless it was something he would not have
liked to admit.
In chapter 49, of his Dialogue, Justin gets Trypho to agree that the Old
Testament says that Elijah will precede the Messiah. But the Old Testament says
no such thing which is why the report of Trypho’s agreement is dubious. This
means that Justin’s discourse that heavily borrows from the gospel about John
being Elijah and Jesus saying so is an insertion. Now why try to get Trypho to
believe things about John being Elijah when Trypho would not have believed
Elijah had to proclaim a Jesus style Messiah? Was somebody trying to make it
look like the gospels were known before they actually were? Evidence for this is
Trypho’s rejection of the doctrine that Isaiah saying one would come crying in
the wilderness referred to the Baptist preparing the way for Jesus. Trypho would
have believed Elijah if he was coming would literally come. It is no use
pointing to an obscure prophet like John who wasn’t regarded as being on the
level of the other prophets and who produced no scriptures and saying he was
Elijah. Anybody could be Elijah at that rate.
The discourse is followed by a report that Trypho learned from it that John is
being said to have come with the same Holy Spirit as Elijah and he finds that
silly. That is a lie and Justin knows it because the Jews had no problem with
God invisibly indwelling more than one prophet at the one time never mind when
there was centuries between them. Justin then quoted texts from the Old
Testament to show that it was possible. Why did Trypho not ask Justin where he
got his information that Jesus fulfilled the prophecies from? Why is he
presented as taking for granted what Justin reports to him is right? Why does he
listen to Justin saying about what happened to John the Baptist and that it
fulfilled a prophecy and then change the subject to object that John and Elijah
having the same Holy Spirit is silly? Trypho would have questioned the story he
was being told not the theology. The bits that seem to have come from the
gospels look so much like insertions made long after Justin died. A forger seems
to have been at work.
If Justin had the Matthew or Luke gospel then why did he depend on Isaiah to
prove that Jesus was virgin-born in chapter 66 when both he and Trypho knew that
it was not good enough as Trypho stated?
The chapter that gives the details about Jesus’ birth and the massacre of the
innocents as Matthew has it is dubious for it is offered as proof that Jesus
fulfilled prophecy and we are given the impression that Trypho accepted it for
that is the end of the dispute. Trypho would not have been that easily
convinced. Then it jumps to the declaration by Trypho that Justin’s scripture
interpretations are contrivances. His silence about the books that allegedly
verify that they are not contrivances shows that somebody has been inserting the
Matthew material into the passage.
The early Christians would have thought that kings from the east came to worship
Jesus and that Jesus had been baptised by John who was Elijah without the
gospels because they created the life story of Jesus out of the Bible prophecies
and John was a popular prophet. A lot of the material in Justin can be explained
that way.
A scribe probably inserted the material that is close to the gospels. It was
material that could have been left out and it is impossible to see what Justin
wanted it for. And why didn’t he use the story of the entry into Jerusalem when
Trypho said nobody knew of this Jesus? Justin would have proven the gospels to
be authentic historical documents before proving that Jesus was predicted in the
Old Testament. That is the logical order and the order Trypho would have
demanded for Trypho complained that the Christians were copying from pagan and
Jewish religious ideas. He thought a lot of the Jesus stuff was stolen from the
story of Perseus. That Justin omitted the logical order tells us a lot. It makes
one think that Justin lost that debate if it happened. Perhaps Trypho was such
an erudite and persuasive denier of the existence of Jesus that the Christians
had to “improve” the Christian cause by altering Justin’s writings to obliterate
Trypho’s success.
OTHER SNIPPETS ABOUT JUSTIN
We have some fragments from Justin’s Work on the Resurrection. This book was
written to answer those who rejected the idea that anybody could come back from
the dead.
In the first chapter of that work he said that truth is free and is its own
authority and should be believed both for its own status as truth and for the
sake of trusting the God of truth who sends it. He said that the truth of
Christianity is sent with authority and it is not right to ask for proof for it
for the proof is greater than the proven and since God is truth nothing not even
proof can be better than God.
In other words, you believe in Christianity because God says it is true and not
because there is any evidence. So there cannot be any evidence when he has that
attitude. When Justin answers objections to the resurrection he never does it by
trying to verify that the apostles and the gospels were truthful so he never had
any gospels - at least in full - and did not regard the apostles testimony as
evidence. Rather than depend on evidence the Christian sees if the gospel might
be true and then gets a revelation from God that it is true. The Roman Catholic
Church teaches that faith is caused when God supernaturally helps you see that
what he teaches is true.
It is certain that Justin did not have the gospels.
OBJECTION:
Now, there are certainly places in the Dialogue where Trypho voices objections
which clearly envision an historical man whom Christians have turned into a
divine Messiah. For example:
Chapter 67: “You Christians should be ashamed of yourselves, therefore, to repeat the same kind of stories as these men, and you should, on the contrary, acknowledge this Jesus to be a man of mere human origin.”
Chapter 38: “For you utter many blasphemies, in that you seek to persuade us that this crucified man was with Moses and Aaron, and spoke to them in the pillar of the cloud; then that he became man, was crucified, and ascended up to heaven, and comes again to earth, and ought to be worshiped.”
But the passage in chapter 8, quoted above, does not do the same, and we have to ask whether behind it might lie something which could encompass a denial of Jesus’historicity—even though Justin does not make use of it that way. The key phrase is, “you invent a Christ for yourselves”(Christon heautois tina anaplassete). This is broad and unspecific language. It could reflect a current accusation by some Jews that “You have invented your Messiah,”lock, stock and humanity. If the phrase is taken by Justin from Jewish parlance of the day and referred to Jesus (Eddy and Boyd suggest that Trypho “is simply denying that Jesus is the Christ”) one wonders why he could not have said that, why it would not have been more specific such as: “You have taken a (crucified) man and turned him into the Messiah.”Instead, “invented a Messiah”could well convey that the Jesus of Nazareth which constitutes that Messiah has been invented. On what has this invention been based? On “accepting a false (foolish, unfounded) report”(mataian akoēn paradexamenoi). This may refer to whatever Gospels (those “memoirs of the apostles”) Justin has knowledge of. But in being declared foolish and unfounded, this could encompass in Jewish opinion an accusation that they are completely false in regard to history and their Jesus character.
CONCLUSION
The evidence concerning Jesus in the Dialogue does not encourage belief in his
being a historical reality. It does the opposite! It discourages it!
WORKS CONSULTED
A Concise History of the Catholic Church, Thomas Bokenkotter, Image Books, New
York, 1979
Alleged Discrepancies of the Bible, John W Haley, Whitaker House, Pennsylvania,
undated
Asking them Questions, Various, Oxford University Press, London, 1936
Belief and Make-Believe, GA Wells, Open Court, La Salle, Illinois, 1991
Concise Guide to Today’s Religions, Josh McDowell and Don Stewart, Scripture
Press, Bucks, 1983
Conspiracies and the Cross, Timothy Paul Jones, Front Line, A Strang Company,
Florida, 2008
Did Jesus Exist? GA Wells, Pemberton, London, 1988
Did Jesus Exist? John Redford, Catholic Truth Society, London, 1986
Documents of the Christian Church, edited by Henry Bettenson, Oxford University
Press, Oxford, 1979
Early Christian Writings, Maxwell Staniforth Editor, Penguin, London, 1988
Encyclopaedia of Heresies and Heretics, Leonard George, Robson Books, London,
1995
Encyclopaedia of Unbelief, Volume 1, Ed Gordon Stein, (Ed) Prometheus Books, New
York, 1985
Evidence that Demands a Verdict, Vol 1, Josh McDowell, Alpha, Scripture Press
Foundation, Bucks, 1995
Fundamentalism and the Word of God, JI Packer, Inter Varsity Press, Leicester,
1996
Handbook to the Controversy With Rome, Volume 1, Karl Von Hase, The Religious
Tract Society, London, 1906
He Walked Among Us, Josh McDowell and Bill Wilson, Alpha Cumbria, 2000
In Defence of the Faith, Dave Hunt, Harvest House, Eugene, Oregon, 1996
Introduction to the New Testament, Roderick A F MacKenzie, SJ, Liturgical Press,
Minnesota, 1965
Jesus, AN Wilson, Flamingo, London, 1993
Jesus and the Goddess, The Secret Teachings of the Original Christians, Timothy
Freke and Peter Gandy, Thorsons, London, 2001
Jesus – God the Son or Son of God? Fred Pearce Christadelphian Publishing
Office, Birmingham, undated
Jesus – One Hundred Years Before Christ, Professor Alvar Ellegard Century,
London, 1999
Jesus and the Four Gospels, John Drane, Lion, Herts, 1984
Jesus Hypotheses, V Messori, St Paul Publications, Slough, 1977
Jesus Lived in India by Holger Kersten, Element, Dorset, 1994
Jesus, Qumran and the Vatican, Otto Betz and Rainer Riesner, SCM Press Ltd,
London, 1994
Jesus the Evidence, Ian Wilson, Pan, London, 1985
Jesus the Magician, Morton Smith, Harper & Row, San Francisco, 1978
Jesus under Fire, Edited by Michael F Wilkins and JP Moreland, Zondervan
Publishing House, Michigan, 1995
Lectures and Replies, Thomas Carr, Archbishop of Melbourne, Melbourne, 1907
Let’s Weigh the Evidence, Barry Burton, Chick Publications, Chino, CA, 1983
Miracles in Dispute, Ernst and Marie-Luise Keller, SCM Press Ltd, London, 1969
On the True Doctrine, Celsus, Translated by R Joseph Hoffmann, Oxford University
Press, Oxford 1987
Putting Away Childish Things, Uta Ranke-Heinemann, HarperCollins, San Francisco,
1994
Runaway World, Michael Green, IVP, London, 1974
St Paul versus St Peter, A Tale of Two Missions, Michael Goulder, Westminster
John Knox Press, Louisville, Kentucky, 1994
St Peter and Rome, JBS, Irish Church Missions, Dublin, undated
Saint Saul, Donald Harman Akenson, Oxford University Press, New York, 2000
The Bible Fact or Fantasy, John Drane, Lion, Oxford, 1989
The Bible Unearthed, Israel Finkelstein and Neil Asher Silberman, Touchstone
Books, New York, 2002.
The Call to Heresy, Robert Van Weyer, Lamp Books, London, 1989
The Case For Christ, Lee Strobel, HarperCollins and Zondervan, Michigan, 1998
The Case for Jesus the Messiah, John Ankerberg Harvest House, Eugene, Oregon,
1989
The Early Church, Henry Chadwick, Pelican, Middlesex, 1967
The Encyclopedia of Heresies and Heretics, Leonard George, Robson Books, London,
1995
The First Christian, Karen Armstrong, Pan, London, 1983
The Gnostic Gospels, Elaine Pagels, Penguin, London, 1990
The Gnostic Paul, Elaine Pagels, Fortress Press, Philadelphia, 1975
The Historical Evidence for Jesus, G A Wells, Prometheus Books, New York, 1988
The History of Christianity, Lion, Herts 1982
The History of the Church, Eusebius, Penguin, London, 1989
The House of the Messiah, Ahmed Osman, Grafton, London, 1993
The Jesus Event and Our Response, Martin R Tripole SJ, Alba House, New York,
1980
The Jesus Hoax, Phyllis Graham, Leslie Frewin, London, 1974
The Jesus Mysteries, Timothy Freke and Peter Gandy, Thorsons, London, 1999
The MythMaker, St Paul and the Invention of Christianity, Hyam Maccoby,
Weidenfeld and Nicholson, London, 1986
The Nag Hammadi Library in English, Ed James M Robinson HarperCollins New York
1990
The Pagan Christ, Tom Harpur, Thomas Allen Publishers, Toronto, 2004
The Reconstruction of Belief, Charles Gore DD, John Murray, London, 1930
The Search for the Twelve Apostles, William Steuart McBirnie, Tyndale House,
1997
The Secret Gospel Morton Smith Aquarian Press, Harper & Row, San Francisco, 1985
The Truth of Christianity, WH Turton, Wells Gardner, Darton & Co Ltd, London,
1905
The Unauthorised Version, Robin Lane Fox, Penguin, Middlesex, 1992
The Virginal Conception and Bodily Resurrection of Jesus, Raymond E Brown,
Paulist Press, New York, 1973
Theodore Parker’s Discourses, Theodore Parker, Longmans, Green, Reader and Dyer,
London, 1876
Theological Dictionary of the New Testament. Kittel Gerhard and Friedrich
Gerhard, Eerdman’s Publishing Co, Grand Rapids, MI, 1976
Those Incredible Christians, Hugh Schonfield, Hutchinson, London, 1968
Who Was Jesus? A Conspiracy in Jerusalem, by Kamal Salabi, I.B. Taurus and Co
Ltd., London, 1992
Who Was Jesus? NT Wright, SPCK, London, 1993
Why I Believe Jesus Lived, C G Colly Caldwell, Guardian of Truth, Kentucky