WHY WAS SATAN SO MUCH ON JESUS' SIDE AS SHOWN BY THE "TEMPTATIONS IN THE DESERT"?
TEMPTATIONS TO CHANGE BREAD
The Gospels of Matthew, Luke and John give a bit of detail about Jesus being
tempted by the Devil in the desert. They think of this episode as a
demonstration of Jesus’ holiness and vocation as saviour of the world.
Only Jesus could have told people that he fasted for forty days and nights
(Matthew 4:2). This had to have been a lie for miracles are meant to function as
signs but there was nobody about to see this miracle of living without food
except Satan who could not have been impressed by it for Jesus said that he
wicked go to everlasting punishment. God would not perform needless miracles.
The Devil suggested to Jesus that he should try to turn stones into bread if he
was the Son of God and Jesus replied quoting the Book of the Law that man does
not live by bread alone but by the word of God. Either Jesus was mad and really
believed that or he was being sarcastic which is a sin for it is not necessary.
In any case, the verse does not refute what the Devil suggested so it is clearly
an attempt to hoodwink. The quote was written about human beings not the so
called Son of God who God would have been obliged to preserve no matter what
danger he got into.
The Devil would not have been concerned about the health and strength of Jesus
Christ unless Jesus was a fraud. He would have loved him to die of starvation in
the desert. If he had to tempt Jesus, Satan would have offered him the kingdoms
of the world instead for that would have been the strongest temptation and he
would have all the food he wanted. This temptation to transmute stones is silly.
Telling you to turn stones into gold would be more
Satan's thing!
TEMPTATION OF MIRACULOUS PRESERVATION
The Devil told Jesus to do a miracle in front of the people to convince them
that he was God’s Son (Luke 4). Jesus was asked to throw himself down from the
Temple and show that he survived the fall by a miracle demonstrating that he was
the Son of God.
Jesus told him that he would not do it for he did not want to tempt God. But if
Jesus was God and did it he would not have been tempting God or trying to make
God do wrong because it would have been what God chose to do. If Jesus was not
God, God gave him free rein with his own magical powers so Jesus doing that
still would not have been tempting God. In either case, the Devil was being
accused of trying to tempt God or to make God do what he would regret which was
not true.
The remarkable thing is, the only way this temptation would make sense is if
Jesus did not have any miracle powers and threw himself from the Temple to try
and tempt God to rescue him. I could do the same so the temptation suggests that
Jesus was nothing but an ordinary fallible sinful man. Jesus was definitely
saying that even if he did jump from the Temple there was no guarantee that God
would save him when he said that for him to do that would be tempting God for
the Son of God or God incarnate simply cannot tempt God for God will preserve
him at all costs even if he does let him die. Jesus was definitely claiming to
be no different to anybody else. He had no supernatural powers. He had no magic
with which to come back from the dead.
Jesus went to the pinnacle of the Temple as if he were ready to jump and be
saved by God in order that the temptation would become virtually irresistible.
The very fact that Jesus went with the Devil to the pinnacle of the Temple shows
that Jesus deliberately sought out temptation which is a sin for it means he was
trying to make himself sin. Even if he intended to resist that wouldn’t be
right, for tempting yourself means you are trying to make yourself give in.
James 1:13,14 says God cannot tempt or encourage temptation. Here we have a man
who was supposedly God trying to tempt himself by accompanying the Devil to the
pinnacle of the Temple so that he might give in and jump.
If Satan wanted the people to see Jesus falling and being supernaturally
protected by God then he wanted Jesus to get followers. He knew Jesus would not
jump unless he was sure he would survive. If the death of the Son of God would
save the world, Satan would have wanted him to survive and would not have risked
even suggesting that Jesus jeopardise his life. Satan would not save the Son of
God and God would not save a fraud so Satan was the one who was going to save
Jesus. The Devil would not have made the suggestion if Jesus were his enemy.
If Satan wanted Jesus to live and survive the fall then Satan and Jesus were on
the same side. If Satan wanted Jesus dead he knew Jesus could rise again and he
would be defeated. But he was sure he wouldn’t be. Either way, they were on the
same side though they might have differed on non essentials.
Tempting God involves blackmailing him to show his power. We are told the Devil
knew that Jesus was God’s Son when he survived forty days of abstinence from
food and drink and spent so much time with Jesus. The Son of God could not tempt
God for to tempt God means to make God prove his power which the Son of God
would already know. It would be spiteful if he asked God to prove himself but it
would not be tempting God. This temptation proves that the others never happened
for they were about tempting God too and couldn’t have done it. Satan would only
try the once if he was going to tempt the Son of God at all.
Tempting God would not be sinful like Jesus implied. It is only asking for
evidence for his existence. Blackmail is forcing someone to give what you are
not entitled to.
Some would say the fall was not to be done in front of witnesses but when nobody
could see. But then it would have been no temptation. Satan had no need to see
how powerful God was for being an ex archangel he knew full well the extent of
that power. And Jesus would have found nothing appealing about jumping and not
being seen. So it is clear Jesus was meant to jump and survive in public.
Christians often tell the lie that Satan wanted Jesus to decide to make converts
the easy way without suffering and without labouring as a missionary. If Jesus
worked miracles then he gave into this temptation. He made people lepers if he
had divine power and then cured them which would be no different from
deliberately falling to be miraculously saved by angels. Anyway, Jesus could
have jumped off the Temple and did all the other works he did the hard way. It
is nonsense to say the temptation was about trying to get Jesus to take the lazy
way out because he could have if he wanted to for we are told that the coming of
Jesus is a gift we do not deserve and was entirely gratuitous. And the lazy way
might have worked better than the hard way too for human nature is funny as God
likes to keep reminding us.
The Gospel of Luke (4) says that Jesus did tempt God like Satan requested when
he went to preach in an aggravating way in of all places a synagogue near a
cliff where God had to intervene to rescue him. Jesus could and should have had
a gang for protection to save God the trouble or should not have preached so
near the cliff. He would have known what they would have been like. The fact
that the gospel may just mean that Jesus might have got away without using an
obvious miracle makes no difference for God still had to do a miracle albeit a
secret one.
It is claimed that Jesus was not into arbitrary displays of power when he
resisted the temptation even though surviving the fall without a scratch would
not be arbitrary but would convert the people. But if he did public miracles
then he had to be into arbitrary displays for he could have done secret ones
instead. So if the temptation was to get Jesus to show off then he gave into it.
Some say the temptation was to make miracles the message instead of making
miracles to verify the message. This is nonsense for Satan never mentioned that
miracles should be the message and indeed did not want Jesus to preach that
message if it was good so he would have told him to forget the message and do
the miracle. He didn’t so Satan wanted Jesus to do the miracle and get fans.
Moreover, Satan would not have expected Jesus to make miracles the message for
people do not like miracles just because they are miracles but because they seem
to offer hope of a better world so he would not have tempted him that way. Thus,
the temptation shows not that Satan was trying to corrupt the good Jesus but
that both were playing for the same team. Jesus was lying about his experience
with Satan to make it look like they were opponents. Satan knew Jesus could do
the miracle and repent and then do the message and he would not have taken the
risk of trying to persuade Jesus to do the miracle unless he was sure Jesus was
on his side. Jesus seems to have been a demon that even Satan looked up to. It
could well be that the Gospels of Matthew and Luke which record the temptations
were trying to expose Jesus as a diabolist and had to write books that looked
Christian to do it.
Christians say that the reason Jesus could not go along with the miracle of
jumping from the Temple and surviving by the power of angels was because this
miracle would only have been for producing astonishment and not for doing
anybody any good (page 65, Why We Believe, Leon Cristiani, Burns & Oates,
London, 1959). But if that is true then why did he not change the stones into
bread and do himself some good? Was there any real difference between going to
the cross deliberately to rise again and what the Devil asked him to do when he
could have saved the human race and died and rose without the cross? You could
say this of the healings Jesus did, he didn’t do them anonymously but in public
to make an impression and astonish the people into conversion. Jesus did set out
to astonish and try to speak to people’s hearts through their wonder. The Devil
never said he wanted Jesus to just go after astonishment, the Devil knew
astonishment is necessary for faith to develop, but to tempt God. The Devil knew
that even if Jesus tried to astonish people but it was no more than just showing
off, it could still result in them converting to the ways of God.
The temptation was not about showing off or wasting power or laziness but about
trying to get God to give Jesus miracle powers and protection. The gospellers
may not have realised that but that is what we read. By doing miracles Jesus
gave into the temptation and lied when he said he resisted it. Satan wanted him
to show himself immune to danger in public which would be a greater miracle than
the resurrection in which some lunatics could have stolen the body and nobody
saw Jesus rising but a few reported visions of Jesus in a world that is full of
visions that all contradict and condemn each other. Satan wanted him to make
quite an impression. When the Devil wanted Jesus to do the perfect miracle and
then Jesus settled for less in the resurrection it shows that by no means can
the resurrection be contemplated as evidence for the sanctity of Jesus Christ
and the correctness and divine inspiration of his message.
In brief: the Matthew and Luke gospels say that the Devil took Jesus to the
pinnacle of the Temple and suggested that he throw himself down for God wouldn’t
let anything bad happen to him. This miracle would impress the people and get
Jesus converts easily because he would need to do it in public to make it worth
his while. That is what Christians tell us. But God might have wanted Jesus to
do that so why was Satan so sure it was a sin? Jesus doing that would not have
stopped him going on the cross later. Obviously the only motivation that makes
any sense is that Jesus was being asked to do miracles.
Satan and Jesus both believed it would be a sin for him
to try. It would be a sin if you didn’t have miracle powers in the first place.
As we have seen, if God gives you the powers then it is up to you if you want to
do a miracle and jump off a skyscraper and be found intact by people expecting
to see nothing left of you but mush. This shows that the gospels of Matthew and
Luke which have this story are hinting that we should not believe that Jesus was
a true miracle worker. Either the miracles are symbols or they were tricks.
Perhaps Satan helped Jesus do miracles through trickery. Many have testified in
the past that Satan rather than changing nature like magic manipulates it so
that a miracle seems to have happened. For example, he could make a ghost seem
to appear to you by making you mistake a ray of moonlight coming in your window
for the shape of a person causing you to imagine that you saw a person who spoke
to you. The gospels make no effort to eliminate this hypothesis for the miracles
of Jesus. They just give us dubious evidence which is faulty precisely because
we are not told enough. The gospels certainly do magic tricks with facts, that
is what conjurers do, they don’t tell all but use misdirection.
The bit added on to Mark 16 to fill the gap left when this gospel did not
mention the resurrection of Jesus states that Jesus gave his disciples black
magic powers. He said they could drink poison and survive and handle snakes
unharmed. He was obviously telling them God would enable them to do miracles
just for show – a doctrine that the entire Christian Church prefers to forget.
If God would do that then it is impossible to understand why he won’t do those
kinds of miracles today. It is undeniable that a liar wrote this section even he
was telling the truth that Jesus made this promise for he claimed that these
signs happened. It may not have been the same author as the rest of the gospel
for the gospel is rather sober while this new section is over the top. The
section clearly states that the message was confirmed by these signs. So it was
miracles that could not be from God more than the resurrection that got
converts! Interesting! That means that nobody in the early Church was an
authority on what was from God or not and nobody really cared if the
resurrection was historically verifiable – they tried to verify it by additional
miracles which they shouldn’t have needed to do.
Whether human or divine this Devil was an emissary of evil. Jesus acceded to his
temptation. He went over to the evil side.
SATAN OFFERS JESUS THE WORLD
Satan tempted Jesus three times. Jesus was starving in the desert and Satan advised him to turn stones into bread. Satan was very concerned for Jesus' wellbeing. It is telling that he didn't show him starving children and tell them to turn their stones to bread. Jesus tells Satan man needs bread alone so the moral of the story is that if God does not want to change the bread then do not try to force him. So why didn't Satan try to use the suffering of others to turn Jesus against God? He knew Jesus was not truly a good man and he didn't want his devoted servant to be to perish in the desert.
Satan then proving he could take Jesus' corpse from the tomb to start a resurrection hoax transports Jesus to the Temple.
"Then the devil took him to the holy city, and made him stand on the parapet of the temple, and said to him, “If you are the Son of God, throw yourself down. For it is written: ‘He will command his angels concerning you’ and ‘with their hands they will support you, lest you dash your foot against a stone.’” Jesus answered him, “Again it is written, ‘You shall not put the Lord, your God, to the test.’”
The argument is that God puts you in this world to look after yourself and others so you cannot expect miracle short cuts. Jesus gave into that temptation later for he did no good works at all only miracles. And it is felt that Jesus was being asked to jump and survive miraculously to win over the people.
As a form of temptation, the Devil promised Jesus that he
would give him supreme power over the world if he worshipped him. The Amplified
Bible reveals that all he asked for was for him to do it just the once (Luke
4:7). Jesus had given into Satan before and all sin is devil worship so he
certainly did give into this temptation.
And when the once or even a few times would have done, Jesus could have taken
over the world from Satan and then repented thus defeating Satan. Or he could
have offered feigned worship to Satan or made Satan hallucinate Jesus adoring
him to get the world. Strange that Satan cannot hallucinate like we can for if
he has any senses at all he should be able to. God could stop Satan doing harm
or as much harm by making him hallucinate. God is worse than he is yet God is
the one who says Satan shouldn’t be doing what he does implying he has no need
for anybody to do evil. The temptation shows that Satan was really on Jesus’
side for Jesus was one of his. The world must really have belonged to the Devil
for the temptation could not work on the Son of God who would know if the world
was not the Devil’s to give if Jesus was the Son of God.
Satan was sure that if Jesus sinned that Jesus would be evil forever which
implies that Jesus was full of latent evil and which certainly infers that he
was not the Son of God.
When Satan left this temptation to last (Matthew 4:10,11) it suggests that he
was reluctant to part with the world except as a last resort. But then he must
have believed that Jesus was the Son of God and not God for God already owns the
world. There was no reason for Satan not to know that Jesus was God if he was so
Jesus probably never claimed to be God. This seems to contradict what I have
said before but perhaps we have caught Jesus out in a lie. Perhaps Jesus said it
was left to last to give the impression that he had to be the Son of God. They
will reply that Luke says this temptation was the second one while the one about
jumping from the temple was the last. They claim they can reconcile the two
accounts by saying that one or both was not chronological. They ignore the word
then in the text that denies this but of course words never stopped them from
using lies to reconcile the Bible’s disagreements with itself. Matthew would be
the chronological one for his order is logical. Satan would start off small by
suggesting turning food into bread, then he would advocate a show off public
miracle and then offer Jesus the world. Matthew would be the one who is most
likely to have the right order. It was because Luke saw that Satan would not
offer the world except at the end and because he didn’t like what it implied
that he shoved this temptation between the other two.
The arrogance of Jesus claiming that the Devil gave him special attention as if
he were the most important man in the world is stomach churning and what
Christians take as self directed monomania in others is not that when Jesus does
it. Sad. How loving and fair it all is!
If Satan wanted Jesus to do miracles to help himself then what if Jesus did that and repented? Satan's temptations would not get him anywhere then. So it is obvious that if Jesus sinned it would be permanent. He would be permanently evil. Maybe that has something to do with why Jesus did speak of sins that are never forgiven such as insulting the Holy Spirit.
Incredibly despite Satan offering Jesus the world if he would worship him, some say the problem was that Jesus was being offered authority over all while God's plan was that Jesus would get it but only if he died for sins on the cross. At that time Jesus never mentioned having to go on a cross. Do they want to argue then that Jesus was here rejecting the authority over the world that Christianity says he has got? Maybe they shoudl think about that.
Those who say that Jesus never succumbed need to be asked
if they were with him all the time to know.
The temptations prove that he was the Son of Satan or that Satan saw him as his
tool.