RELIGION AND JESUS ARE ERECTED ON A BAD HABIT "SPECIAL PLEADING"
Special pleading is when you state the rule and give an exception without giving any valid justification for the exception. It is a double-standard. Consistency is needed and it is only fair.
Religion uses special pleading a lot. For example, Jesus comes along and you are
told he heals all who ask. He heals nobody in your town though many beg. His
disciples will then ad hoc. Special pleading only happens after a criticism or
disproof emerges. So dishonest is it that it waits until after the unwanted
embarrassing fact shows its face. Back to the expected cures. They will say that
if nothing happened it may be because the inhabitants are evil or have no faith.
It's an excuse for making the unwary immune to the truth. They are asking you to
take their word for it that it is an exception. It's arrogant to say that the rule
that applies to all people does not apply just because they say so. They are
asking you to give them too much trust. They are cheating. They want their view
to get special consideration that they will deny you and keep from you if you
disagree with them.
Another example, they say, "Jesus rose bodily from the dead on the Third Day
after he was crucified." You go in a time machine and into the tomb that morning
and catch Peter and John trying to get the body out and see a cousin of Jesus'
dressed up as him. You go back and tell the Christians. They say, "Satan stacked
the deck so that you went back to the wrong time. Maybe they were practicing for
a fraud but that does not mean Jesus didn't rise as we say and when we say."
Another example, "If you ask why the universe exists when there might not have
been anything the answer is God created it from nothing." This says all things
need a reason to exist but God is exempted. There is nothing wrong with the idea
that there might have been absolutely nothing not even a God. If God depends on
lies to be accepted then that makes atheism a better option in its own right and
for your own protection from manipulators.
If God exists then God created the idea of God. The whole creation is about him
and depends on him. So he has to implant the idea of a relationship with him in
you. This amounts to, "God gave me the idea of him and it is
correct for he gave it to me." Bottom line, you are really saying you know this
because you know this. It is about you pretending to be infallible in this thing
not God. You reject circles like that in most things and perhaps in
everything else. A circular argument is combined then with special
pleading.
Special pleading leads to bigger examples of special pleading. It needs to fool and suck others in to succeed. It is dangerous.
Cherry picking is often called the fallacy of exclusion or the fallacy of
incomplete evidence. It is about picking out the evidence that suits what you
want others to believe or what you want you to believe as if the contrary
evidence is not there. It is not letting the evidence, that includes the person
who is pointing you to it, that does not suit you speak and thus amounts to
lying and bullying. The person engaging in special pleading will use it
for a when they could use it for b so they are cherry-pickers. Call them out.