SHUN CONFESSION IN THE CATHOLIC CHURCH
Catholics have to confess their sins to a priest who then judges if he should forgive them or not. He decides if they are repentant. They are obligated by the Church on pain of mortal sin and eternal hellfire to confess at least once a year.
The Church tells you that if you have “Catholic” guilt go to confession and
get the sin forgiven and it will go. That is clear statement that the religion
is trying to function as a placebo. Trying to make amends sincerely should lift
the guilt not that. And it is a worry if people are conditioned to feel so
guilty that they run to the confessional.
# Making laws that compel people for religious reasons to confess are
intrinsically evil. It should be optional.
# Anybody that is really sorry for sin makes amends before they confess where it
is possible. For example, the child molester should give all he has to some fund
for victims and then confess.
# It is hard to know yourself. You might think you repent the evil deed. It is
easy to think that for you will never get the chance to undo it back. You will
never prove you would do differently. It is easy to tell yourself you will not
do it again. That does not mean that if you could go back in a time machine you
would do differently. A resolution not to do it again does not imply that you
really deeply regret the past and would not do the evil deed if you could rewind
the clock. You may be glad you did it before though you wouldn't do it now or in
the future. Being glad to have married Annie does not mean you would marry her
in a different past. You think you would not do the evil thing again if time was
rewound because it is easy to think it. You do not think it because it is true
for you cannot know that. It is not really the repentance it seems to be. The
more your repentance is about God and not you or others the more dubious it
might be. Would you really be inclined to heed a person who claimed to repent of
loving his baby more than God?
# To wipe the slate clean because an unreliable person claims they would do the
past differently is really condoning their evil deed. It is trusting the
untrustworthy.
# Forgiving is based on the evil person really turning over a new leaf because
he or she freely chooses to. Forgiving so that you are free from bitterness is
about changing how you feel about the evil and not about loving the other
person. It is not really forgiving. Forgiving another who claims to be sorry but
who has proven his word is worthless is not forgiving but giving the benefit of
the doubt. Real forgiving is about knowing what was intended by the evil and
that it is truly repented. The Roman Catholic Church is unconcerned about real
forgiveness.
# Aquinas said that love is simply willing what another wills. It is about doing
the good to other people that they want done to them. This turns love into
something dry and icy. It is baffling how some think confession should be a nice
experience. They do not understand the Catholic faith. And the definition of
love is so vague it is useless.
# Telling people it is a serious sin not to confess once a year is vindictive.
# Telling people it is a serious sin not to confess serious sin as soon as
possible is vindictive.
# Encouraging people to tell their sins is not acceptable when there is
insufficient proof that the priest really has a right from God to hear their
sins. Confession and the obligation to confess to a priest are based on that
right. But there can be no such right when there is no evidence for such a
right. There is no need for confession to a priest - if there is then why did
God not institute it until this late time in human history? And even if there is
a right, the Church has no concern for informing the people of the evidence. You
are encouraged to confess without knowing if you should.
# Telling people they must primarily repent because God asks it of them is
encouraging them to become psychopaths should they doubt or disbelieve in God.
If you love others for God's sake it means you do not really love them except as
objects with which to love God. You value them for God not themselves. They are
not valued but only treated as valued.
# If you tell God you repent for his sake, that is only words. If you really
care about God enough, you will be willing to endure endless and extreme torture
at the hands of evil spirits for some good reason and because God's plan
requires it. But you are not willing. And if you say you are, that is easy to
say when the opportunity is never offered to you. Catholicism demands
hypocritical repentance.
# Telling people that serious sins will put them in Hell forever should they die
unrepentant is off the scale vindictive. And especially when the serious sins
are actually minor - such as masturbation or missing mass on a Sunday or
disagreeing with papal dogma.
# Our reason - our power to cast out contradictions in our thinking - is our
highest attribute for we cannot truly trust or look after others or ourselves or
the truth properly without it or if we ignore it. The alternative is to depend
on what our feelings make us want to do and that is dangerous. Our faith in
reason is not an act of faith just like faith in religion would be. Some say it
is no more convincing than religious faith. Reasonable faith is the only faith
we can have. It is not a choice. It does not need evidence for it is something
you see is correct just by looking. The confessional is harmful for it has no
regard for reason and is not about helping people become more rational.
# No studies are undertaken to ensure that confession really does more good than
bad. Nobody cares. The use of anecdotal evidence by the Church that it does some
people some good is unimpressive. Such evidence is as manipulative as the
anecdotal evidence put out by beauty cream companies and their useless
anti-ageing creams.
# Nobody is given guidelines about safe use of the confessional and there is no
system for reporting a priest who has behaved inappropriately or who has asked
inappropriate questions.
# No priest who would have known who clerical sex abusers were through
confession ever asked them to free them from the obligation of the seal so that
they could report them or get them professional help. The seal of confession
only applies if the penitent wants it to.
# No priest has reported a clerical colleague to the police to stop him abusing
children. They could say that the penitent waived the seal of confession. It
would only be the penitent's word against theirs. They should lie.
# Taking confession seriously as a deterrent to sin is absurd when it is based
on bad rules. It totally opposes the notion that nothing that risks hurting a
person should be allowed in religion or in anything. Faith is no excuse.
Some - not all! - Catholics might say confession has been good for them but you
see through this when they admit they would rather the priest forgave them after
a public confession of sin in a general way and if they didn't have to confess
privately. They do not confess properly anyway. What is the point of confessing
going to a prostitute without detailing the activities, the reasons and the
circumstances? If A is married to a good wife, that makes his evil worse than it
would be if she were slightly less good. The confession is really about wiping
guilt feelings and not the evil within. The evil within may still be dealt with
- that is in spite of confession and not because of it.
Confession to a priest should be shunned. To be silent is to let the priest
promote and enable the evil system. It is not on. Do not demean yourself by
saying nothing.