SHOULD CHILDREN BE EXPOSED TO CHRISTIANITY?
The human person's brain develops fastest during the first
three years of life. Everything gets set then and it is hard to change. So any
damage done to a child's development during this time will result in long-term
and short term mental health problems. That is why we need to take a firm
stand against religious indoctrination as being harmful in principle. It
treats the child as something to be hypnotised almost. And then there is
the matter of the religious doctrines having harmful content.
Whether you think it is hypnosis or not, parents seem to have that kind of effect on their children. Children are prone to believing what their parents say. Parents wittingly or unwittingly will form their child's mind irreversibly in some way forever. Religion knows this which is why it is so centred on the family. Even parents sending their child to a religious school sends a message: "The school will tell you what you are to think about religion for us. It has our stamp of approval." Religion says that even your secular dealings are to be offered to God so they are sacred and holy though not obviously so. That is how it makes sure parents can unwittingly absorb the faith or a strong attachment to the religious structure. It explains why atheists of a religious background often will not be true to atheist principles and have their child given to a religion for cultural reasons and for the ceremonies. Child conditioning will lead to the child internalising the religious structure and then the faith. Faith always comes second to the structure. That is why Catholics who would not learn the faith or develop their faith will still run looking for baptism and confirmation and first communion ceremonies.
How dogmatic and fundamentalist Christians groom children
and harm them:
"They are highly submissive to established authority, aggressive in the name of
that authority, and conventional to the point of insisting everyone should
behave as their authorities decide. They are fearful and self-righteous and have
a lot of hostility in them that they readily direct toward various out-groups.
They are easily incited, easily led, rather un-inclined to think for themselves,
largely impervious to facts and reason, and rely instead on social support to
maintain their beliefs. They bring strong loyalty to their in-groups, have
thick-walled, highly compartmentalized minds, use a lot of double standards in
their judgments, are surprisingly unprincipled at times, and are often
hypocrites. But they are also Teflon-coated when it comes to guilt. They are
blind to themselves, ethnocentric and prejudiced, and as closed-minded as they
are narrow-minded. They can be woefully uninformed about things they oppose, but
they prefer ignorance and want to make others become as ignorant as they. They
are also surprisingly uninformed about the things they say they believe in, and
deep, deep, deep down inside many of them have secret doubts about their core
belief. But they are very happy, highly giving, and quite zealous"
"Over time, this authoritarian conditioning breeds a sense of personal
inadequacy and endangerment. The traumatized self becomes angry, hostile, and
resentful. However, because the religion that produces, legitimizes, and
represses the trauma is beyond question, the traumatized individual remains
blind to its causes. This leads to authoritarian aggression, that personality
trait Dr. Altemeyer describes as a “little volcano of hostility bubbling away
inside of them looking for a (safe, approved) way to erupt.”
- See more at: http://www.goodnewsclubs.info
Many believe that a child being raised in a religious tradition encourages the
child to learn from religion and hopefully commit to the religion. It is thought
to be better than having the child see religion as a private matter which leads
to people dropping out of the social side of religion and creating collections
of individuals and not communities. The risk of indoctrination is thought to be
worth it.
Many children are raised in terribly dysfunctional family setups whereby they
are neglected and abused. A surprisingly high number grow up to be normal
upstanding people. Some however do not. A religion often carries on like it is
the child's real family and overrides the child's family. Many religions hurt
children with their superstitions and their moral and tribal taboos. That a
child can suffer terribly and still come through it well does not justify any of
the harm done by dysfunctional families. And religion is the quintessential
dysfunctional family and its speciality is lies. If the child grows up to become
the adult from Hell, the blame may lie entirely with the religion.
This work explicates the mental, "spiritual" and emotional damage that the
Christian faith can do to a child. Children who are spared this have been
exposed to a Christianity that has not been implemented properly and which has
been presented in a very sweetened up way. Self-esteem problems stem from
childhood. Christianity is to blame for the biggest problems because it tells
children it is their biggest thing. Even liberal versions of the faith teach
things such as that God in the form of Jesus wants us to believe in what he has
revealed in the Church and live it and that God by definition is the being who
must be loved most of all. Any religion that seeks to be the dominant influence
and value in the life of a child risks inflicting, directly or indirectly,
psychological harm on them. Some therapists and parents believe that if a child
does wrong, he or she should suffer low self-esteem as a consequence. Even that
is okay, what is not okay is religion trying to give them something extra to
dislike and hate themselves for. Consider how the child who tells a lie may
suffer low self-esteem for it - that child will suffer more if she sees the lie
as not only bad in itself but also as an affront to God!
THE DEMAND
I demand in the interest of the rights of the child that the deliberate exposure
of children to Christian propaganda for recruitment purposes be made illegal.
Our children are the future of our world. It is important that if anything that
exists that may or does damage them psychologically can be prohibited by the
force of law that it be done. The rights of children come before their parents
and priests and teachers in many respects for they are so young and are at their
developmental stage mentally and emotionally. Parents have no right to determine
the religious beliefs of the child for religion is a private matter.
We do not want our children exposed to excessive violence or pornography on
television but we do nothing about the far more insidious and deadly spiritual
pornography that is dished out by the Churches.
Remember faith and reason cannot be equal. Reason implies willingness to revise
your views and correct them. So if it is wrong to denigrate faith it is even
more wrong to denigrate reason. To indoctrinate children into a faith is
denigrating reason.
Instilling humanistic or non-religious values in children is bad. But instilling
religious values is worse. Both are forms of indoctrination and this is wrong
for these things should be their decision and nobody else's. It is okay to help
children find the values themselves.
A little religious knowledge or spiritual knowledge is worse than none at all.
If people knew these things better they would not be taken in by religious and
spiritual charlatans such as the Medjugorje visionaries and the local tarot
reader. Children are usually fed enough religion or spirituality to try and get
them hooked and they become easy fodder for their religion and maybe even
another religion.
We take it for granted that a person should stand by his beliefs unless
something turns up that shows them to be incorrect or wrong. Religion is taking
advantage of that principle. If it is true that we are born programmed for
religion, surely it is all the more reason for us NOT to be indoctrinated. There
is a danger like most people that we will be drawn to feel that if we are going
to err then we would rather err with the majority. That impulse helps explain
how religion conditions people.
Children have alarmingly strong self-justifying tendencies. A child will bully a
child and claim that she deserved it. Religion and the concept of deserving go
together. There would be no need for religion unless it was thought people
deserve bad things or good things. It is even based on the notion that God
deserves service and love from us. Religion only makes the child a bigger
self-justifier than he is and that leads to a boost in aggression and to
sectarian devotion. A vicious circle appears. The more the child harms others
the more self-justification is necessary. And if he cannot justify himself
before parents and others he will turn to God for justification and feel he has
got it. And the more self-justification then the more aggression appears. And
when enough children go that way and grow up like that the more religious
persecution they will foment.
When adults look back to their faith in Christ, will this bring back memories of
hope, imagination and joy? Did Jesus give you magical moments in which you
experience a perfect world just for a fleeting moment? This experience is
considered so special for a child that it is reasoned that it Santa makes
childhood special so parents lying that Santa exists is acceptable.
The recruitment of children to the following must be ceased immediately by legal
force:
# To faiths that insist we must look after others because it pleases God - all
our love must manifest our complete love of God. A child who struggles with
self-esteem and depression and abuse does not need to hear her parents
encouraged to see her just as a tool with which to please God.
# To forms of faith that see messages from angels and Heaven and God in
virtually everything. One risk is that a child might jump off a cliff thinking
he will be saved by an angel. Or a child might think she is getting warnings
about a person. That can lead to an innocent person being hounded.
# To forms of faith that require you to approve of evil and murder - even if
they are peaceful now. An example is children being told that the Bible is
infallible despite its Jesus having demanded vengeance by the stoning to death
of adulterers. If you do not engage in acts of violence you still revere them.
# Serious superstition is a great evil. You don't want to create a world where
you hold that if somebody walks under a ladder and then dies horribly shortly
after that they brought it on themselves by asking for bad luck.