THE SHEPHERD OF HERMAS
The Shepherd of Hermas is a tip of tiresome mystical drivel that was considered
to be scripture by many in the early Church. In the Eastern Church, it was
widely regarded as scripture in the 2nd and 3rd centuries. The Muratorian Canon
used by the Church of Rome about 200 AD which was the earliest canon of the
Church permitted the Shepherd of Hermas to be used in private worship. In 367
AD, because of Athanasius, the entire Eastern Church allowed converts to try and
get spiritual guidance from that heretical drivel.
The Shepherd seems to have been written by a brother of Pope Pius 1 who reigned
from about 140 AD to 155 AD. It was written in this time. The Muratorian Canon
says so though The Shepherd itself claims to have been written earlier than that
in the time of Clement of Rome. The work could be first century for it seems to
have been formed in the womb of a very primitive Church.
Some place the authorship in the time of Pope Zephryinus (197-217 AD) (see New
Age Bible Versions, page 564) but that is too late. The book could only have
gained its popularity in a Church that did not have official gospels for it
conflicts with them at every major point and many minor ones.
Gore tells us that the writer was stupid (page 496, The Reconstruction of
Belief) and careless (page 525). The writer seems to have denied the full
humanity of Jesus (page 525). The reason he seemed to have been stupid was the
silliness of the doctrines and the receptiveness towards paganism. That does not
make him stupid. He was writing for a stupid Church.
Hermas said he was taken away into Arcadia. Arcadia was the place where the
pagan god, Pan, lived. Hermas believed that the pagans were divinely inspired
when he did not refer to Heaven instead. This contradicts the gospels.
There is a raunchy bit where the writer enjoyed the embraces and kisses and
stayed overnight with a lady in his vision. Jesus forbade sexy thoughts and
visions. And so did the hypocritical Hermas.
The book says that the apostles and the bishops and the teachers and deacons
agree with one another (Vision 2). He approves of them which tells us a lot
about what tradition was saying about the apostles at that time. If this is
true, then the gospels were written by heretics and forgers intent on perverting
the true faith as exemplified in Hermas.
Hermas says you can tell a true prophet of God by the fact that the prophet is
tranquil (Vision 5). This is wrong for Jesus and Moses endured a lot of stress.
Remember Jonah. The book is denying the validity of these prophets at least at
certain times and is certainly saying that the gospels are lying about Jesus or
that there are no gospels. Jesus often got angry, tired and nearly died of
fright before his crucifixion. The existence of this Jesus was denied in the
early Church which is the same as rejecting the gospels.
The book claims that Hermas received a revelation from God telling him “that for
post-baptismal sin there was indeed forgiveness, but for one such sin only – no
more” (Vision 2:2). This is a serious departure from the practice and teaching
of Jesus Christ. Jesus pardoned Zaccheaus who committed countless sins. Hermas
fantasised about a married woman and wondered if he could get pardoned for this
sin. His answer shows great hypocrisy for even if he never committed that sin
again there were plenty of others to choose from. Baptism would only be lawful
on your deathbed which conflicts with the urgency of the message to repent and
get saved delivered by Jesus. Jesus declared the Holy Spirit to be in his
apostles indicating that they had the same status as baptised persons assuming
baptism gives the Holy Spirit as tradition says. But he forgave their many sins
after this time.
Hermas wrote, “Put off grief from thyself, for it is the sister of doubt and all
ill-temper…Dost thou not understand that grief is the most evil of all the
spirits, and most to be dreaded by the servants of God, and more than all
spirits it destroys man and obliterates the Holy Spirit?” (741). Nobody could
believe any of this. One is entitled to grieve when God does evil for a purpose
for that purpose may not do you much good. Grief does not bring doubt but could
be caused by faith. Jesus grieved on the cross. When you only get one chance for
post-baptismal sin there is plenty to despair about. It is not grief that is to
be fought – it is fear. Jesus did suggest that fear was bad so again Hermas
rejects Jesus.
It says that Jesus was adviser to God which denies that Jesus Christ claimed to
be the only Son of a perfect God. A God who needs an adviser is not all-knowing
or perfect. The adviser would be better than he. Jesus always speaks of himself
as inferior to God in the New Testament. The Bible Jesus follows a pattern of
acting inferior to God at all times so this doctrine denies much of the New
Testament. Even if Jesus was God the Son he could not advise the Father for the
Father is unbegotten while the Son and the Spirit proceed from him.
It supports the nonsensical notion of water baptism having the power to save.
It numbers the apostles at 40 contradicting the gospels twelve.
It asserts that black skin is a sign of unrepentant badness and of being under
the spell of evil spirits.
Jesus had a purse in common with the apostles yet the Shepherd says, “They that
are rich in this world, unless their riches be cut away, cannot become useful”
(page 572). So you have to give up material things to be useful as a Christian.
It says that there is nothing easier than keeping the commandments of God to
earn salvation which is an exaggeration that the New Testament would have had no
time for. Paul said that we needed somebody to keep the Law for us because we
could not keep it ourselves.
Hermas never looks on Jesus as a historical person (page 46, Jesus, One Hundred
Years Before Christ). He never uses the name of Jesus or calls him Christ but
speaks of a spiritual force with some personal aspects for he calls the Son of
God the Law. Hermas never speaks of events in the life of Jesus implying that
the public Church had no more than some collections of Jesus’ sayings. Hermas
gives twelve new commandments that bring salvation if obeyed – the Bible says
salvation is by grace alone without obedience – and obedience to the gospels is
not one of them. This is an unthinkable omission for one that knows and respects
the gospels. By implication, it says that Jesus had no provable historical
existence and known life for us to emulate.
The work reflects the fact that the Church may have plotted to keep people
ignorant of the details concerning Jesus in the gospels. The popularity of
Hermas testified to the scheming obscurantism of the Church. It hated the gospel
Jesus whether it knew of him or not.