PROOF THAT THE WORSHIP OF GOD IS REALLY INDIRECT SELF-WORSHIP
Derrida, “Neither Priests, who supposedly speak for God, nor Philosophers, who
supposedly speak for Reason, should be trusted; this ‘logocentric’ claim to
speak from a privileged perspective (e.g., Reason, the Word of God) is a bluff
that must be called."
Comment: It depends on the ability of the Philosopher. And it is worse to depend on hearsay about what God has said than to depend on any philosopher.
If you have desires about what you want God to mean, what God is and how you are going to honour him, it is not really about what he wants. You are the real God underneath all this. God is just your echo chamber, your idol.
And that is exactly what is probably going on with most religionists we would think. But in fact it is what ALL of them are doing.
People want to believe in something that can make life okay or bearable in
times of trouble. That’s what’s attractive about believing in God.
And how does faith in God make life bearable? Because no matter what happens we
tell ourselves God has a plan and we have an extremely important and
indispensible role to play in that plan. We use God to delude ourselves about
our absolute importance.
It is delusional because it contradicts the notion that if God is perfect and
free he was under no obligation to make us or make our lives the way they are.
It is irrational. So believers have to adore something that cannot really be
called a God in order to feel okay about living.
The reality is that emotionally and physically some things are unbearable. Trying to feel they are not only adds to this torture. Being asked to feel that is being tortured.
The driver towards God then is a cruel lie. If that is what our interest in God has to depend on then we can say even if there is a God people's faith is toxic and like arsenic.
God is really just you being about you and you blaming others for their
knowledge that their situation is terrible and won't be improved.
What about people who seem to be helped? What helps those who need comfort
and a sense of meaning in life is belief. Belief is your creation, your
self-empowerment. So it is not God that helps but belief in God. But why does the
belief need to be in God? Why not believe in your power to find strength within,
a strength that is all your own? That would be better and more effective.
How valuable is this help when it harms others and many of those who are harmed
will not broadcast it? The success or seeming success is what you hear
about for religion does not want to think about the other side. It is not
good if some are getting success while the same message is destroying others.
Why is it that religions with the most charm and charisma and dynamism get the
converts? The answer is that it is not so much the message that gets the
converts as those who sell it.
Enthusiasm is contagious. If religion were really about God, people wouldn’t
be so easily swayed by what others say and feel in making up their minds. It is
about fitting in with the neighbours or the family or becoming part of an
exciting plan. The religious person, though claiming that God comes first, in
fact puts God in a niche so it is themselves they are really out to satisfy.
They are not interested in God except as a fantasy tool to please themselves
with.
Good gives us pleasure. That is why it attracts us. When we do good, we do it
not because it is good or because God wants us to but because we want to.
Therefore we are our own God. We are lying if we pretend to oppose erotica on
television or abortion or injustice for the love of God.
The Mormons worship a God the Father who is little more than a resurrected man
with magical powers. The Catholics worship a God the Father who is completely
different: he is spirit and totally unlike man. Put a Catholic theologian and a
Mormon theologian in a room and each one will be convinced his God is real and
that the others is false. But one of them is wrong despite what he thinks and
feels and no matter how many good works he says his view of God inspires him to
undertake. One of them is creating his God. One of them is serving himself by
serving his own creation. That is what many people would think. I would go a
step further. Since psychologically they feel the same and their faith works the
same way, BOTH of them are creating their Gods. Both of them are idolaters.
Atheists are idolaters too but at least we are honest about it. We admit that we
prefer this world and ordinary life to any God. When the believer is outraged at
blasphemy against his God, it is outrage against his own creation and therefore
himself that he is worried about.
No religion can rely on miracles or reason to justify belief in its view of
divinity. When anyone starts to believe in God they are just inventing a God for
themselves plus a creed for themselves that happens to be similar to that of the
other members. If they were in another religion they would invent another kind
of god.
What about people who believe in a bad God? It seems at first that if God were
just a mental idol nobody would want to have an evil one. Some people like fear
and are addicted to creating their own problems. They are masochists and/or
sadists who would like to have a bad God to worship. And if you are a sadist or
masochist life will not feel that bad for you so you think others have to worry
about God being bad not you.
If there is a God and Jesus Christ, then they cannot be worshipped for there is
no evidence that we should worship. No matter how much closely imagined versions
of them resemble them they are not intended to be them. The Church denies the
Father and the Son in a subtle way thus it is drunk with what it calls the
spirit of antichrist (1 John 2:22,23; 4:2,3).
Religion is not devotion to God if God is good for it resides on blind faith
which is dangerous and bad. It is obvious that it is malign to blindly believe
whatever you want. Religion is base self-gratification therefore the adoration
of God is insincere and is really done out of selfishness. It is self-worship
and it is criminal for the religious rules that go with it are a great source of
misery.
Loving the sinner and hating the sin or as it is more sweetly put "love the
sinner not the sin" [it says you must not feel indifferent to the sin and
you cannot love it so then you have no option but to hate it] is impossible. Can
you trust the sinner and not the sin? Can you punish the sin and not the sinner?
Can you curse the sin and not the sinner? Can you ostracise the sin and not the
sinner? Christians are fully aware of the hypocrisy - they don't believe anybody
who tells them they hate their Christianity but love them. Christians call to
hate. They demand that you hate and then do the additional evil of lying about
it that it is really love you do. People would have little time for God if they
didn't think he loved them despite their sins and those of their loved ones.
They want a crutch and a God who orders others to love them despite their sins.
They invent a God who can do this impossibility to console themselves. Because
he is based on self-deceit, they are prone to hate anybody who sees through
their lies.
God religion is commanded to hate sin. You would also be bound to hate evil acts
that are not sinful. For example, a person who mistakenly believes that babies
are demons and goes and murders them is not sinning but doing a good work in his
heart. The results however are evil. The Catholic would have to hate the
Protestant worship of God for he would see it as erroneous for the Protestant is
outside the one true faith, the one true system of worship that God has set up.
Nobody hates sin and misplaced good very much and as long as that is the case
they can be held to be adoring an idol that may look like the real God if he
exists but which actually is not. In so far as you do not hate what God hates,
you do not love God but a caricature of him. To love God is to hate what he says
is evil.
To ask one to hate sin is to ask one to hate sinners. To also ask one to love
sinners is asking one to pretend to love. The Church boasts that it can love the
sinner and hate the sin. It is a lying boast and the Church even goes as far as to
say that it is an extreme sin to doubt that loving sinners and hating sin is
possible. There is no point in believing in God or wanting God if loving the
sinner and hating the sin are contradictory. The Church's worship of God is
based on self-righteous pride. The Church hates and maligns those who see the
deceit of loving sinners and hating sin.
To say that John does bad, whether he is deliberately bad or not, is to say that
if bad is hateful then John is hateful. If bad is not hateful then why counsel
to hate sin? It is never sin we hate but what sin says about the person. Sin
indicates that the person is hateful assuming sin is to be hated. To hate the
sin and to love the sinner makes out that there is a distinction without a
difference. It is like saying, "I hate your Christianity but admire your
religious notions." "I oppose everything about you and everything that you do
but I don't oppose you." "I am glad you are alive but I am opposed to the fact
that you are breathing."
It is bad enough for an unbeliever in God to say, "Love the evil person but hate
and detest the evil they do." But it is worse for a God believer to say that for
they believe that evil is not just hurting a person but insulting God so evil is
worse if there is a God. God deepens hypocrisy and the deceit and darkness of
the human heart. Its black evil appears as an angel of light. Imagine how bad it
gets if the belief in God and the adoration of him is just hypocrisy!
The believers tend towards hypocrisy. This itself does not prove the doctrine
of God to be a blight. But it shows he will not really have men as custodians of
his revelation. Following Messiahs and Popes and Prophets is just asking for
trouble. It’s really idolatry.
The God of the Church then is an expression of hypocrisy. The Christians treat
their ethical opinions as if they were God's will and an expression of what God
is like. This is idolatry and self-serving.
If God exists and supports say the Roman Catholic Church as the only true Church
he can look after it. If the Church is mocked and if somebody denies a treasured
doctrine such as that Mary was sinless the Catholics get bigoted and insecure.
They will want to retaliate and often will retaliate. This is a sure sign that
they sense their faith is not of divine origin. Why else would they act in a way
so inconsistent with the doctrine of God?
Most people do not have the knowledge and intelligence to know what they are
talking about when they talk about God and their true religion. The more stupid
I am in relation to my friend, the more it is the image I have of that person
that I have the relationship with and not the person.
Stephen the first Christian martyr reminded the Jews how they believed in the right God who lived in the Temple. Yet he attacked their view as idolatry on the basis that there is nothing special about the Temple for God dwells everywhere. The Temple is just as sacred as anywhere else. He illustrates how shockingly easy it is to be idolatrous and not know it. You can worship the real God in idolatrous fashion without it being noticeable.
If somebody does not have a personal relationship with God and God is not giving guidance to that person then the person has a God who is just a bigger version of themselves. They worship themselves indirectly. They create God and worship that creation. One way can that be done even if you have a God who is not you, is you internalise that God. You can internalise another person so that your devotion to them is really devotion to yourself.
The Christians invent a God of lies - he is their special idol. They make him not out of wood and metal but out of the desires and fears they have. To worship your own invention is to worship yourself.