SECULARISM, IT'S A CIVIL METHODOLOGY
We call on people everywhere to stand with us to establish an international
front against the religious-right and for secularism. We demand:
Secularism is not about religion or non-religion but about the way the state is
structured. Secularism is not the presence or absence of religion.
Recognition that secularism is not violent opposition to religion but merely
refusing to accept its truth claims in order to treat all religious and
non-religious people the same. Secularism realises that to ignore religious
revelations is refusing to accept them. Secularism cannot treat religion as
anything other than just another organisation. That is the bottom line. It comes
up against the doctrine of some religions that they are family communities of
God or a magical or supernatural union of people. Religion often it based on the
DENIAL that it is just a club.
Secularism calls for complete separation of religion from the state.
Recognition that secularism is a fundamental right - it is not a mere opinion or
an option that it is okay to take up or not to.
Religion believes that civil disobedience to the state is sometimes acceptable
on religious grounds thus it denies us the right of secularism.
Separation of religion from public policy, including the educational system,
health care and scientific research.
Religion should have no privileges - for example, sex shops near churches should
be allowed by the town councils because if grocery stores objected they would
object in vain.
Abolition of religious laws in the family, civil and criminal codes.
An end to discrimination against and persecution of LGBT, religious minorities,
women, freethinkers, ex-Muslims, and others.
Freedom of religion and atheism and freedom to criticise religions.
Religious belief as a private affair.
Equality between women and men, religious and non-religious, and citizenship
rights for all.
This list came from free thought blogs with a few changes
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Basics
Secularism is a government policy not to favour one religion - even the majority
one - over another and not to favour religion over what is not religion (eg
atheism, humanism etc). It is not inter-faith or inter-religion but
inter-belief/non-belief.
Religion is remarkably easy to spot but very hard to define. Secularism may
struggle to learn where religion begins and where religion ends. Some say it may
need to try and know in order to take care that religion does not get privileges
that non-religion doesn't have. Many argue that the state judging what is a
religion and what isn't, opens the door for religious people to get favourable
treatment under the law if the state regards them as comprising a real religion.
Religions depend on theology and magic and superstition to determine who is a
member for real and who is not. When members of one faith are recognised as a
religion by the state and members of another are not, that is unfair and a
violation of secularism. The solution is to forget about people's religious
affiliation - simple. The state assessing what is a religion will drag the state
into theology and superstition. Treat the bishop the same as the atheist beggar.
Secularism is not a religion. Some say that it denies that one can know what
religious doctrines are true which they see as a religious truth-claim. But even
if the secularist does believe a particular religion is true, it does not give
him the right to favour that religion in politics and discriminate against
others. Secularism is definitely not a religion. It is a method.
Secularists believe that we should judge things as if there were no Gods or
magical beings or magical powers for it is hard enough to implement laws that
are beneficial without the added encumbrance of religious belief. The plan is to
help equalise the rights of believers and non-believers and refuse to extend
privileges to religion. When religion seeks the right to discriminate against
people it is seeking undeserved religious privilege, not religious freedom
though it pretends it is. Secularism is not just the removal of religious power
from the state but also from power relations within the family, community and
general society.
Secularism in certain countries may wish to keep religion from interfering with
the government because the relevant religions have violent teachings or
scriptures and many of their members easily resort to faith based violence. Some
individual secularists believe religion is harmful to truth and human rights
which is why it has to be ignored by the state if it wants the state to enforce
religious laws. Some worry that secularism in general is refusing to confess
that it fears religion.
Secularism is forced to recognise that not everybody's rights or perceived
rights can be granted to them by the law. The law has to be selective for the
greater good. Thus non-religious rights come first. If there is a choice between
honouring a non-religious right and a religious one, honour the non-religious
one. This is not unfair because religion is something you take on but don't have
to. The notion that when different religions claim rights that contradict one
another that the biggest religion should be given the rights as you cannot give
them all the rights conflicts with secularism. Secularism is not directly
anti-religious but it is anti-religious in its side effects. Though secularism
aims to keep out of the affairs of religious institutions and orders religious
institutions to keep out of public and state matters this balance is hard to
create and sustain. If this happens it is better to err on the side of caution
and favour secularism.
Secularism is based on the fact that the law should not criminalise victimless
crimes (eg nobody should be fined for saying Jesus was just a flawed man like
everybody else - Jesus may be dead and you cannot libel the dead).
Secularism is not based on the fact that there are many religions so we must be
neutral for we cannot please them all. If inability to please everyone were what
it is about, then we should simply say that secularism is about the fact that
there are many different faiths and no two people believe exactly the same
things. Secularism in fact that is true to itself will be neutral about religion
EVEN IF THERE IS ONLY ONE RELIGION.
Secularism would still be with us and be the right stance even if there were
only one religion. So secularism is intrinsically sceptical about religion. The
law is teacher so when the law is secular it teaches secularism and opposes
religion.
Religion and faith are not the same thing. Religion is outward allegiance while
faith is private and only the person herself knows if she really believes. If
the state starts enforcing laws along religious lines, the state is judging that
those who demand this on the basis of their rights as religious persons are
sincere. That is impossible most of the time. And what if people claim the right
to murder on the basis that they allegedly sincerely believe God told them to?
It is not for the state to assume or judge religious sincerity.
Only secularism can take care of rights - even it is not very good at it that it
is not its fault. It would be worse otherwise. If the state may make stupid
laws, then letting religion get involved will only make it worse. If the law is
silly that is all the more reason for keeping religion out of it.
Religion is intrinsically opposed to real human rights. It only allows human
rights in a religious context. In other words, the rights it gives and supports
only look like rights. It tries to distort and oppose the one thing that can
deliver on human rights: secularism. It is akin to saying that you don't believe
in justice but people have a right to their food. It is the appearance of
believing in rights. And it is a false appearance.