COLOSSIANS 2 AND THE JEWISH SABBATH
Colossians 2:16-17 seems to forbid judging anybody who keeps the Sabbath and some say this is referring to those who use the Sunday Sabbath or who retain Saturday as the Sabbath. It is remarkable how Christianity gives no respect to those who wish to use Saturday. The verse seems inconclusive for sabbaths appears to refer to specifically Jewish feastday Sabbaths not the Saturday Sabbath.
The view that the Sabbath has been done away and now we can celebrate and
worship on a Sunday and may not even have to keep the regulations about rest is
commonly believed. This stance is based on Colossians 2:16 alone. This verse
says that nobody is bound to keep Sabbaths because they were signs of the body
of Jesus. The Jewish Sabbath is not a sign of the body but of the creation and
so it cannot be meant. Exodus in the ten commandments says that the Jewish
Sabbath is in remembrance of creation and the day God rested. This implies the
Sabbath should be kept by the whole world for the whole world was created.
Colossians is referring to unscriptural Sabbaths. Sunday is an unscriptural
Sabbath.
It is agreed by careful Bible interpreters that nothing in Colossians 2:16
cancels the Sabbath though many of them still think the Sabbath has been
switched to Sunday (page 120, Encyclopaedia of Bible Difficulties). For us it is
enough that Colossians still believes in a Sabbath to prove that the Saturday
one might still be in force.
Let us look at it more deeply. Paul or an impostor in his Colossians 2:16,17
says that because Christ has overcome the hostile forces that “Therefore” we
must let nobody judge us “with regard to a feast day or a New Moon or a Sabbath.
Such [things] are only the shadow of things to come, and they have only a
symbolic value.” Because before this writer wrote that the demands of the Law
had been done away in the death of Christ people suppose that he must mean the
Jewish Sabbath and feasts. But between them both is the assertion that Jesus
overcame the hostile powers which many heretics at Collosae at the time were
worshipping. Many heresies did and still do combine paganism with its belief in
many gods, some of whom are malignant, with Christianity. This means that the
connection they make may be incorrect. They put the verse in the wrong context.
Instead of telling us that the Sabbath and feasts are abrogated Paul, or the
writer, may be saying that the Sabbaths and feasts of the hostile powers are not
binding. The “Therefore” goes with the bit about the conquest.
Seventh-Day Adventists say the passage only forbids the special Sabbaths or the
extra ones invented by the Jews. Against this it is argued that Paul or the
writer would have been clear on what he meant by Sabbath so he must have
abolished the seventh-day one as well. They say he was declaring all Sabbaths,
God’s and man’s across the board to be abolished. But that would have done away
with the Sunday Sabbath he allegedly wanted the people to observe too. And yet
people using this argument want to believe Sunday is the Sabbath! If it doesn’t
abolish Sunday as the Sabbath how can we say it abolishes Saturday as the
Sabbath?
The Adventists also stated that the Saturday Sabbath was kept before the Law was
given and even by Adam and Eve. The Bible does not mention anybody keeping the
Sabbath before the coming of the Law but that proves nothing. Genesis says that
God sanctified the seventh-day before he made Adam which means he set it apart
for holy use. He spoke face to face with Adam so Adam would have known he did
this. So it is reasonable to suppose Adam did keep the Sabbath. It follows that
the Adventists are right. Why would God set apart that day then if he was not
going to institute the Sabbath until the Law came later? When the Sabbath
existed before the Law it must be an everlasting duty upon us. It is nonsense to
object that no instructions were given for the Sabbath day before that so there
could have been no Sabbath for God making the day a holy day of rest said it
all. It was a day for rest and prayer.
Another objection is that the Israelites in Egypt were unable to keep the
Sabbath because they were enslaved. That does not work either for there could
have been an obligatory Sabbath despite the fact that they could not keep it.
Now when Christianity commanded us to observe the Sabbath from the very
beginning though it has disagreed on what day the Sabbath falls on, it is clear
that this verse does not mean the true Sabbath (whether it be the Saturday
Sabbath or the Sunday) one but false Sabbaths and not the traditional feasts of
the Jews but the newly invented ones. A false Sabbath would be a day kept for
prayer and resting by allegedly divine command that has no divine authority at
all. Even false Sabbaths have value but only as symbols. All pagan and heretical
practices contain a morsel of truth that gives them great meaning as metaphors.
The people Paul was writing to were guilty of idolatry and mixing Christianity
with heathenism. They were condemned for inventing festivals of idolatry.
The author of Colossians is not saying that since the Sabbath and the feasts
have only symbolic value they should not be kept. He may be hinting that the
heretics gave them some other kind of estimation, a magical one. He was against
the implementation of unnecessary rules and the condemnation of those who did
not keep them. He does not want people judged for bypassing them.
If the verse relates to the seventh-day Sabbath being out the door then it would
say so clearly. The author knew that some heretics would argue on the basis of
the text that it was wrong to have an obligatory Sabbath day at all and
therefore he could not afford to be ambiguous. Read the words, they could mean
that there is to be no Sabbath at all when you read them out of their religious
context which refers to pagan practices. So, he was not being ambiguous for he
didn’t mean the scriptural Sabbaths and feasts.
In his Encyclopaedia of Bible Difficulties, Gleason W Archer writes that the
word translated Sabbath in the verse which is sabbaton should be translated as
the more accurate Sabbaths. The Hebrew religious calendar had Sabbaths other
than the seventh-day Sabbath. These Sabbaths were supposed to be the days of the
Feast of Tabernacles and Unleavened Bread both of which ran for eight days each
(page 120). Now all these days must be kept to obey the Bible (Deuteronomy 16
requires that the Feast of Booths be kept for 7 days).
We must realise that the author was unlikely to have meant these days after the
feasts if he had already declared the feasts to have been abolished. If the
feasts are done away then why keep the days after them which are related to
them? This would make it more likely that the verse is against the man-made
Sabbaths and feasts of the heretical Christians.
After what he wrote, the author said that these things were shadows of what was
to come and the reality is the body of Jesus. So, he could not have meant the
Sabbath and the feasts commanded by God in the Law for they did not all picture
the sacrifice of the body of Jesus. The Sabbath pictured the completion of
creation.
The Bible feasts and Sabbaths were not pictures of the atoning and saving work
of Jesus because not keeping them holy brought very harsh penalties with it. God
wouldn’t come down that heavy on mere pictures or symbols especially when he
never said anywhere in the Old Testament that the feasts and Sabbaths never
symbolised anything about the Messiah Jesus or anybody.
Before (2:8) and after (2:22) what the author wrote about the Sabbath and the
feasts he condemns human traditions so the context is about man-made doctrines
and rites. So how can Christians say that the condemned Sabbath and feasts were
those commanded by God in the Law of Moses?
The Christian interpretation of Colossians rests on one thing only. The
assumption that the early Christians did not retain the Jewish feast days and
the Sabbath. If they had they would have known that Colossians was not telling
them to stop. So since the days were not abolished explicitly it is obvious that
the Christians would have carried them on. Colossians condemns man-made Sabbaths
– such as the man-made feasts and holydays of obligation of the Roman Catholic
Church on which work is forbidden – therefore it condemns the purely man-made
Sunday Sabbath.