ETHNICITY AND OUR ANIMAL ORIGIN IN THE LIGHT OF ADAM AND EVE
The Bible says once there was only one human being Adam and he was given a wife
Eve to be the mother of all the living. This contradicts science in how we have
an animal nature and how we have different races. Adam and Eve had language
skills which means there was not enough time for one race to form into many.
Human Relationship to Animals
Russell Stannard is a retired high-energy particle physicist born in 1931. He
has written books in defence of Christianity against claims that the faith is
against science. His book Science and Belief is referred to for this article.
Stannard asserts that we are not different from animals in quality but quantity
on page 34. We have more faculties so that we were able to develop spiritual
faculties.
That contradicts the biblical doctrine that we differ from animals in kind not
just in degree. God had to make man from the ground and woman from man to stress
that though there were animals there they could not be converted into man. God
did not take a rib from a chimp to make Adam with it. To stress that we read
that Adam needed a partner and found no creature to be suitable so God then made
Eve.
Adam & Eve
In his book, Science & Belief, Russell Stannard, quotes the modern view that if
we all came from Adam and Eve we would all have the same ethnicity.
Stannard argues that the Genesis story of the origin of woman was “highly
unlikely…as a literal account of how women originated” (page 17). So what is it
about then? He replies, “It is saying that man is not complete without woman and
woman is not complete without man. It is drawing attention to the importance of
marriage.” Stannard has failed to engage with the text. We must note that
Stannard cannot read the mind of the author of the Genesis and cannot know what
he was likely to intend.
Attempts to get around the literal meaning are attempts to make human opinion
about the word of God into the word of God itself. That approach leads to people
deliberately contradicting the Bible and claiming to believe that it is the word
of God. If Genesis were being non-literal it would say so clearly. The Bible was
meant to be understood by simple people and people of simple faith. How could it
be if it used non-literal stories and wouldn’t say so?
An opinion is a view that does not really matter that much for it is open to
dispute and is only a little better than a guess. To turn faith into opinion is
to make a shipwreck of the Christian faith and is a recipe for confusion and
chaos.
Though Genesis says that God made Eve as a companion for Adam, it does not
follow that she was Adam’s wife from her creation. Perhaps they were to grow
together. It cannot be argued that the story of Eve being made from Adam has
something to say about marriage.
Stannard claims that Adam and Eve were sent by God into the Garden of Eden not
“to laze about and have a good time. They were put there to till the soil and
look after the garden” (page 17). This is said to have a lesson for us: “That we
are not on the Earth to exploit it” (page 17). First, we are not in the Garden
of Eden. Second, Adam and Eve’s idea of a good time might have been looking
after the garden. Third, Adam and Eve looking after the garden might have been a
hobby when they got fed up with being lazy. Stannard is just inventing the
alleged lessons. If God or the Bible author were good teachers they would not
leave us having to depend on the likes of Stannard to think it all out for us!