RETHINKING SOME OF THE REASONING IN RUSSELL’S “WHY I AM NOT A CHRISTIAN”
Bertrand Russell made many objections to Christ and Christianity in his paper Why I am not a Christian.
Let us look at some points he makes.
“What really moves people to believe in God is not any intellectual
argument at all. ... As I said before, I do not think that the real
reason that people accept religion has anything to do with
argumentation. They accept religion on emotional grounds".
It is true of many believers but not all. It underestimates
how good theologians can be at lying. Even if
belief in God is ridiculous it doe not follow that believers necessarily believe
in God without intellectual arguments. Anybody can believe because of an
inadequate argument.
“One is often told that it is a very wrong thing to attack religion, because
religion makes men virtuous. ..That is the idea -- that we should all be wicked
if we did not hold to the Christian religion. “
Jesus himself criticised religion as it deserved. The "true" Church of his day
was Judaism but that did not stop him telling it the truth about itself. Jesus
implied that no Church should get away with doctrines or behaviour that
undermine the truth revealed by God and the paths of righteousness. Jesus was
clearly well are that religion does not need to worship statues to become
idolatrous. Sometimes religion itself can be idolatry when it stands proud and
arrogant and admires itself rather than God.
Not all believers hold that non-Christians are wicked in the sense that they are
like wild beasts or demons. But they all hold that it potentially might
happen. That is a terrible hateful opinion to have.
“You find as you look around the world that every single bit of progress of
humane feeling, every improvement in the criminal law, every step toward the
diminution of war, every step toward better treatment of the colored races, or
ever mitigation of slavery, every moral progress that there has been in the
world, has been consistently opposed by the organized churches of the world. I
say quite deliberately that the Christian religion, as organized in its
churches, has been and still is the principal enemy of moral progress in the
World.”
The Christians say that the scriptures never command that we must like war,
abuse other races, keep slavery going etc. They lie - the Bible God does command
unnecessary violence.
Some believers say that if all Christians are bad that does not mean that the
faith itself is bad. It only means it's being disobeyed.
But surely if the faith came from God and God changes lives their argument is
wrong?
Russell claims that the Church teaches, "What has human happiness to do with
morals? The object of morals is not to make people happy."
It is said that he is using a straw man approach. He wants to present
Christianity as a grim and unattractive faith. Some say that Christianity
teaches that there is good happiness and dangerous happiness. So happiness in
itself is not good. It is only good when it is based on virtue. So it means that
the Christian would rather you were severely depressed and virtuous than have
you happy but lacking in virtue.
The Church says that you should be prepared to give all to God forever. If you
sacrifice everlasting happiness in order to please God forever, then happiness
is less important than virtue.
“Religion is based, I think, primarily and mainly upon fear. It is partly the
terror of the unknown and partly, as I have said, the wish to feel that you have
a kind of elder brother who will stand by you in all your troubles and
disputes.”
Reason tells us to get to know people before we try to love them. It might make
you virtuous to love a person you don't know but who you think you know. It
might make you happy. God by definition demands all our love and as he is the
ultimate source of good we must love others only for his sake - we love him
through them. It is extreme cruelty though it may not look like it to encourage
people to love a God who does not exist. What adds to the outrage is how people
speculate that God is right to allow terrible things to happen to people. If
your love for God is evil, then your approving of him despite his allowing evil
to happen, makes you evil. In fact, we should be afraid of believing in God
instead of believing in him out of fear. Fear has to be at the bottom of belief
in God. As fear is largely illogical, it is no surprise if belief in God is
illogical and incoherent.
“Fear is the basis of the whole thing -- fear of the mysterious, fear of defeat,
fear of death. Fear is the parent of cruelty, and therefore it is no wonder if
cruelty and religion have gone hand-in-hand. It is because fear is at the basis
of those two things. In this world we can now begin a little to understand
things, and a little to master them by the help of science, which has forced its
way step by step against the Christian religion, against the churches, and
against the opposition of all the old precepts. “
Russell assumes that all Christians only accept Christianity because it helps
them deal with their fears. This is said by Christians and others to be true of
some believers but not all. But do the happy Christians really understand their
faith? How Christian are they?
Some say, "The author of 1 John wrote that the perfect love of God takes away
all fear. The Christian can be free of fear and enjoy his faith." But this is
hypothetical - he said the perfect love of God casts out all fear but he is
clear as were the rest of the New Testament authors that nobody loves God
perfectly.
Russell is said to be ignoring the fact that many nonbelievers are in the grip
of fear. Believers say, "The atheist can be terrified of suffering and death.
The atheist philosophy robs its followers of a sense of the presence of God.
They are left without a sense of a God who is with them in their suffering.
Christians are not promised freedom from suffering in this life but freedom from
feeling totally abandoned."
But people, Christians and atheists, both can feel totally abandoned. Our
emotions and our depressions are not necessarily logical or realistic. We can
feel 100% abandoned though we are not. Being reminded that we are not can make
our pain worse. It is understandable that people may remind us, but to encourage
them to believe in a God who is with them is downright cruel.
Christianity has no right to promise people that it will benefit them. The
people who suffer most are those who are in the depths of depression.
Christianity lets them down and no benefits or alleged benefits that it gives to
other people can justify what it does to the profoundly depressed.
Fear is the parent of cruelty. Religion is based on fear and dangerous - it
should be abandoned.
“Science can help us to get over this craven fear in which mankind has lived for
so many generations. Science can teach us, and I think our own hearts can teach
us, no longer to look around for imaginary supports, no longer to invent allies
in the sky, but rather to look to our own efforts here below to make this world
a fit place to live in, instead of the sort of place that the churches in all
these centuries have made it.”
Russell assumes that science and Christian faith are necessarily in opposition.
Christians say this is false. They say, "If God created the universe and is the
author of the Bible then there is no necessary contradiction between science and
faith. Sometimes we think there is conflict but if we wait and keep researching
we will find that the conflict gets resolved."
In reality, we should be more interested in science than faith. If we refuse to accept science when it contradicts faith, we are putting faith first. If it turns out the science is wrong, the fact remains that we still value it less than faith. To devalue science is to devalue the methodology of science which is, "Do not believe anything, unless the evidence says it is true. Be prepared to change your mind." Faith cannot compare to that at all.
Russell needs to be read more widely. If Christianity
really believed in choice it would give you the for and against data
before accepting you as a member. Russell's book should be on
the booklist.