BIBLE IS THE MANUAL OF RIPPERS INCLUDING JACK THE RIPPER
The Judeo-Christian Scriptures Justify and inspire the Religious Murder of
Prostitutes
As a Jew the Ripper knew the Jewish Bible very well and it was the centre of his
faith and culture.
One terrible terrible feature of the Law of Moses in the Bible is how much pornographic time is given to sick details about mutilating and eviscerating beautiful animals by an altar in the mae of God. God loves giving out such laws. While love your neighbour gets one paltry line the bulk of the writings revel in violence against animals of the sickest imaginable kind. And in the name of worship? That is what Jesus Christ called infallible scripture whose word would never pass away and what he went to the Temple to celebrate.
Jesus preached love but think of what love is - it is sacrificing to protect
another from danger. So love presupposes danger and that evil people are
out there. To love a person is to be prepared to fight the evil in them
for evil is seen as being in some way self-destructive and insane. Love
then has a dark side and is based on fear of evil people and of the loved one
becoming evil. That is why the love that permeates the Bible is so dark
and dangerous.
There was a lot in the Old Testament to make the man become Jack the Ripper. He
would have known it well. And the example of the Christians who likewise tried
to follow the great commandments and ended up twisted and neurotic would have
affected him too. He would have known of Christian preachers who preached about
the battle of Armageddon. There the final earthly battle between God’s forces
and his enemies will take place. The Old Testament predicts that the people of
God will be armed and turn on those who are not the people of God. In that day
God will kill those who disobey him such as prostitute and unbelievers and
heretics but he will do it through protecting his people as they slaughter the
hated enemies of God. Jesus was certainly not a pacifist though he may not have
lifted a sword against anybody when he was on earth. He sanctioned the Law and
the Prophets, the whole Old Testament as the Jews have it. The Law and the
Prophets promise that one day this king, the Christ, will come and lead the
Church into bloody warfare against evildoers and unbelievers. Jesus accepted
such declarations as referring to himself.
In the Laws God gave the Jewish prophet Moses, it is clear that prostitutes
should be cruelly murdered. These laws start off with, “The Lord said to Moses”.
The laws claim to be the very words of God. The method favoured for destroying
prostitutes was stoning them to death. These Laws are part of scriptures
revealed by God. It would be illogical to accept that these scriptures are true
when they say there is one God, that God is jealous and that he acted visibly to
take care of Israel and to reject their more unpalatable teachings. God
miraculously split the Red Sea in two to let the Israelites cross over to the
other side so that the Egyptians couldn’t recapture them. When the Egyptians
went into the gap God let the water come back in on them. He could have used a
wind or something to stop them trying to enter. Why accept that God murdered the
Egyptians by drowning them in the Red Sea unnecessarily when he could have used
a storm to prevent them attacking the Israelites and deny that he wanted
prostitutes put to death?
God said, “The daughter of any priest who profanes herself by playing the harlot
profanes her father; she shall be burned with fire” (Leviticus 21:9).
Prostitutes by default are adulteresses. “The man who commits adultery with
another’s wife, even his neighbour’s wife, the adulterer and the adulteress
shall surely be put to death” (Leviticus 20:10).
If a man marries a woman and finds that she wasn’t a virgin when they married
the following is prescribed: “if it is true that the evidences of virginity were
not found in the young woman, Then they shall bring her to the door of her
father’s house and the men of the city shall stone her to death, because she has
wrought [criminal] folly in Israel by playing the harlot in her father’s house.
So you shall put away the evil from among you” (Deuteronomy 22:20-21). Clearly
when she could be murdered like that in front of her father’s house the father
and the family were not allowed to be upset over her death. They must rejoice in
it. Children are to be loved conditionally on the condition that they don’t
seriously break the law of God. There can be no doubt that the Bible encourages
hatred of women who commit sexual sin. There is no doubt that scriptures like
this encourage psychopaths and religious maniacs. Just because the Church claims
the right to revere such scriptures, people have to die!
Jesus himself said that the Law, these teachings, are the heart of God’s word
and that no true prophet from God will contradict it. He said he didn’t come to
repeal the Law of Moses but to improve it. He tightened it up. It forbade
adultery but he forbade even the desire for adultery. A woman was brought by the
Jews to Jesus accused of adultery. This crime was punishable by death by
stoning. He said that whoever was without sin could cast the first stone. They
all went away for they all had sins. All this tells us is that only people who
aren’t guilty of those kinds of sin themselves have the right to condemn a
person so cruelly to death for adultery. To read it as an endorsement of letting
her off the hook is totally wrong and he didn’t say she shouldn’t be put to
death. He did say that it was right to stone her if the stoners were any better
than her. Also putting people to death without consulting the judges of Israel
was illegitimate. Then it wouldn’t be killing her that would be the sin but
bypassing the judges. They had no right to execute her anyway. When they took
her to Jesus and not to the judges it shows they were lying about their
certainty that she was guilty. It is telling that Jesus despite that is still on
record as wanting her stoned if the circumstances allowed it. What a
woman-hater! Nothing in the Bible indicates that holy murder is wrong.
St Paul an apostle of Jesus and therefore an authorised explainer of the
teachings of Christ stated that in no sin do you sin against your body but one.
And that is by having sex with a prostitute. Christians are considered parts of
the body of Christ so to have sex with a prostitute is to unite Christ with a
harlot (1 Corinthians 56:15-20) an immense sin. If the sin is so repulsive it
will be impossible to avoid hating prostitutes. Sex must be the worst sin
possible for Paul excluded the idea that self-abuse or using your body to steal
was as bad and was trying to unite Christ with evil. He certainly had the idea
that to unite Christ with a sexual sinner was so bad that uniting him with a
thief or murderer was nothing in comparison. There is real hatred for
prostitutes in this theology.
Christianity incites to hatred against prostitutes for though it has no evidence
that any of its doctrines are true it still dares to accuse serious sinners of
deserving everlasting torment in Hell from which there is no release. This is
slander when there is no evidence or proof. If you love your son or your father
and you imagine that he will suffer horrendous torment in Hell forever if he
dies after sleeping with a prostitute then how could you possibly avoid hating
that prostitute? Many of the Jews believed in eternal torment for serious
sinners after death and in the bigoted idea that adultery and prostitution were
necessarily serious sins. If the Ripper agreed it would make him hate
prostitutes. Even if he didn’t he would have still hated prostitutes for the
prostitutes were baptised Christians and were uncaring if their trade led men to
Hell.
Judaism and Christianity see how their God commands the destruction of certain
sinners in order to purge the sin from the midst of the people. They command
then the hatred of sin. Jesus said that you should hate sin so much that you
should cut your hand off if it makes you sin to get across how much one ought to
detest sin.
Both religions then teach that you should hate the sin but many forms of them
teach that that you must love the sinner. This is absurd. You either hate the
sin and the sinner or you love the sinner and the sin. Why? Because the sin is
something that the sinner causes and does. It is a part of the sinner. You can
hate somebody’s sickness but not hate them for the sickness is something that
happens to them and isn’t their fault. But sin is not sickness. It’s the
deliberate creation and willing of evil. To say that John’s work is a disgrace
is to say that John is a disgrace.
It is not going too far to accuse Judaism and Christianity of self-deception and
hypocrisy in their teaching. We all know by experience that loving the sinner
and hating the sin they commit is impossible. The teaching has a lot in it even
when so diluted, to incite to hatred against sinners.
The Jewish and Christian scriptures both teach that if there is one commandment
you must keep it is the one to love God with all your heart and strength for God
gave this commandment to Moses (Jesus confirmed it). It implies this by saying
this is the greatest commandment. So love starts with loving God not yourself or
others. The commandment that comes next is the next most important but
significantly it is not the most important, “you shall love your neighbour as
yourself”. So you are to love God more than yourself or your neighbour. But we
know that if you are to be in anyway normal you must start with loving yourself
for failure to love yourself properly is reflected and manifested in cruel and
malicious actions towards others. The commandments forbid this as sin which
helps explain why those most devoted to these commandments ended up thirsting
for blood. Despite the love of neighbour requirement, it is plain from the
commandments that religion is for God and not for man. Man may benefit but that
is not what religion is for. Benefits are side-effects. So it is a sin to seek
any benefit in religion. This advocates a pining for death and suffering and
blood which we see reflected in Jesus who refused to take simple steps to avoid
being crucified but embraced this terrible death. To frustrate your natural need
to love yourself is to foment anger in yourself.
What, “Love the Lord your God with all your heart and soul and powers and the
next most important commandment is to love your neighbour as yourself” really
means is, “We the ministers of God ask you to believe in God and put this belief
above everything else.” It is really the belief that is being loved. This is the
pure stuff of bigotry and shows that God religion is intrinsically power hungry
and authoritarian. Rules come before people. No wonder God religion has produced
so many charming psychopaths. There are Catholic priests and bishops in Africa
threatening the people with hellfire unless they leave themselves open to AIDS
for condom use is a sin.
Judaism and Christianity, when correctly understood, are not humanitarian
religions. People are helped not for their own sake but for the sake of the
faith and because the faith asks it. If the faith asked one to murder them then
it would have to be done. The underlying lack of value placed on the person is
there whether believers murder for the faith or not. If faith comes before
people then it is okay to kill in the name of faith and God and religion. That
is what the anti-humanitarianism of these faiths is saying.
God told Saul through Samuel that he wanted to punish the people of Amalek for
blocking Israel when they were coming out of Egypt by getting Israel to put them
all to death and even the children (1 Samuel 15). When mercy was shown God got
angry. This was commanding war both for revenge and obedience to the Lord.
Christians will say that revenge was not the only reason but one reason and that
the main reason was to eradicate their evil. But God would have stated the main
reason if that had been right and that is what a responsible and careful God
would do. God is condoning war for the purpose of vengeance. Christians say that
it was good of God to command things like that because there is a life after
death for the dead babies who would have inherited the evil characteristics of
their parents had they not been killed and that the parents should have been
killed for they were irremediably evil (page 104, Christianity for the
Tough-Minded). Loads of evil parents have good children and even the Bible does
not say that the Amalekites were that bad. Besides, God had founded no religion
for them for the Hebrews did not want them in theirs and there was no trace of
the doctrine of a holy and nice afterlife at that period of time. God hadn’t
revealed any of it so how could the afterlife justify what the Hebrews did when
they didn’t believe in it? What right had they to kill over Samuel who was only
one man claiming to speak the word of God? And it is judgmental to accuse the
people God told Israel to kill of extreme obstinacy in evil. It is not right
that many Christians try to make up excuses for the Bible’s version of God for
that means they worship a kind of being they know is evil. Today, prostitutes
and homosexuals would be in the same moral category as the people of Amalek. We
are to hate the Amalekites so we are to hate them as well.
The Jews and the Christians hold that the Old Testament in the Bible is the word
of God. God spoke the word and preserved it for us. No other work is the word of
God and infallible except Christians add the New Testament in as well. When God
had to put in his violent and hate filled commandments and revelations into his
word instead of more peaceable and edifying substance then God has a definite
predilection for violence. To adore his book as his word is to become as bad as
he is. Most of the violence in the Bible is encouraged against women. God
reveals himself through his word. God commands that God be adored and liked
above all. That means his book has to be liked too for you can’t love God and
hate what he has said about himself and what he wants.
Joel 3 says that God will assemble the nations and have a judgment with them so
he will engage in direct communication and he calls his people to turn their
tools into weapons and Egypt shall be left in desolation as a result of the
final world war in which the Jewish people will be triumphant because God used
them for taking his revenge (verse 21). Other incitements to violence from God
can be seen in the book of Obadiah, Ezekiel 38-39; Zechariah 12 and 14; Daniel
2:44; Revelation 17:14; Revelation 2:26-27; Revelation 19:14. Jews believe in
the Old Testament passages here and think that the Messiah when he comes will
lead them into this war. Jesus claimed to be this king and that he would return
as the Old Testament foretold. When Jesus was not a pacifist it is hardly right
to assume that he did away with the Old Testament God’s murderous and
bloodthirsty laws. He never needed to fight when he was alive except when he
caused a violent riot in the Temple. He embraced his death because he said it
was right for him to die – God needed the gore and suffering and blood to save
the world - and not because he thought that bearing arms was wrong.
Books such as the Bible are dangerous to the minds of disturbed people. Because
people promoted these books as correct and without error for God wrote them and
God doesn’t make mistakes, five prostitutes in the East End of London had to be
brutally slain in 1888. Those who never change their opinions love themselves
more than the truth. And Jews and Christians when loyal to their faith, and not
to some watered down version of it do insist that it is a virtue never to change
your mind about the Bible being God’s true word.
If your religion says violent revelations and Bibles are from God or promotes
such which give mixed messages on violence it is its duty to take responsibility
if somebody reads that stuff and becomes mad enough to carry it out. That
religion will not take the responsibility shows it is itself capable of great
evil.