Religion and Civil War
By religion we mean organised religion. Unorganised
religion is best referred to by the word spirituality.
The Catholic and Protestant faiths caused civil war in
Ireland.
They played a huge role in the civil wars. But was this
religious input the precipitating cause - that is to say, the principle reason
for the war? Is there such a thing as religious war or are there wars with a
religious dimension?
The Catholic and Protestant faiths teach that we must
love one another and even our enemies. Does that put them in the clear?
No. They teach this love as a religious principle revealed to them by God.
Thus it follows that correct religious belief is the foundation of religious
morality. That is to say, correct belief - defined as believing what your
religion requires you to believe - matters more than doing good. Good
becomes a side-effect of correct belief. This attitude is the seed of
religious hatred and conflict. They argue as well that if your belief is
incorrect, then you will only imagine you do good. You are a well-meaning
trouble-maker. There are plenty of examples of people who make great
sacrifices for what they know must be religious lies. During the Easter Vigil
Mass, Catholics are unperturbed at references to a God who kills the Egyptians
and then asks the people to sing a hymn of praise for his evil. And even worse
there is a prayer asking that the whole world will become children of Abraham
(Christian) and enjoy the inheritance of Israel. The inheritance in the Bible is
a political one. Many of those people read all that creepy stuff and pray those
ugly prayers and still suffer for the Church. This is fanaticism in essence even
if the fanaticism does not spill out in a violent way.
The Mormons were viciously persecuted on every level.
That did not stop the whole persecuted leadership of the Church in 1835 lying
about revelations that Joseph Smith received. He altered his own revelations to
produce a new fake book of scripture called Doctrine and Covenants.
If a man can make great sacrifices to become wealthy even
though he knows he will not live long enough to get any enjoyment out of it and
is now ready to burst open with stress, then a man can sacrifice foolishly for
God. Both men devote themselves to something that is good but they devote
themselves in a perverted way. The whole point of devotion to God is claimed to
be down to the fact that it is good to do so. A man then can be a fool for good
and whether that good is God or money is irrelevant. People do great harm
willingly in the name of good. The avaricious monster does it so that his family
may have material security. He's still a believer in good. The point is, belief
in God makes no difference to a person's behaviour. It cannot. The person
changes themselves if they turn from harming others to helping them. The
emphasis put on God by religion is just superstition.
Those who abhor the conflicts will nevertheless say, "God
works through human error and sin to bring people to the faith he has revealed."
In other words, as bad as the conflicts are they are not all bad and are about a
distorted support for religious truth as opposed to religious error. They will
judge that some good will come. That is their judgement on the human level. But
then they bring God into it. They say he will use the conflict to promote the
truth. To see some good on the human level is fine but to bring God into it
means that if there is no God, they are EXAGGERATING the good that will come.
That is dangerous. It is very Pollyanna. It is vulgar.
The doctrine that you have to be nice to people and
educate them in religion to bring them to God contradicts the Bible teaching
that only God converts people by working inside them. Faith is seen as a
supernatural gift from God. Such a teaching is no help when religions fight each
other.
Religious conflicts primarily about doctrine can and do
happen. Zwingli and Knox the reformers wanted Catholic priests put to death.
Brigham Young butchered certain sinners to make their blood flow to atone their
sins. Moses and Jesus agreed that the law of God was right to demand that
certain people be stoned to death. Jesus agreed with it in principle as even his
treatment of the adulteress shows. He said it is okay for non-sinners to stone her
to death.
Also, religions do tell lies on each other and hate each
other even though they may not take up arms.
Wars can start off just because of little things. For
example, Irish society has the tendency to label people Catholic or Protestant.
A person who was not baptised but who is considered a Catholic by accident will
be labelled Catholic though in Church doctrine she is not Catholic. And those
who call themselves Protestants while believing in nothing in the Bible will be
accepted as Protestants. The label is where the sectarianism starts. It is a tiny
thing but the consequences are huge. People vote along sectarian lines.
Catholics live in one housing estate and Protestants in another. They won't mix.
The label is about putting people into boxes to make divisions among them and
has no concern for how their beliefs, whatever they are, give them their
identity. The Catholic who believes all Luther wrote is given a Lutheran
identity by his faith. The label does not respect what he truly is. It cares
little for genuine religious freedom.
Religion claims that God made us all to have a
relationship with him and each other in his true and holy religion. Those who
reject that relationship are therefore not as valuable as those who accept. If
religion is nice to them, it is because it tolerates them and treats them as
potential friends of God. Thus the "concern" is manipulative.
If religion has a role in a conflict then the conflict
will be harder to resolve.
A person may see her religion as her identity. She is the
religion and the religion is her. To insult it or question it is to insult or
question her. This sense of religious identity is made even stronger if there
are close ties between her religion and the state. It is like the Irish
perception that if you are not Catholic you are not really Irish even if you
speak Irish and worship all that is Irish and were born in Ireland and are a
model citizen.
One religion has a worldview and another has a different one. A world view is a huge thing - it is about how you see the world and see life. Different worldviews mean that people will have real difficulties in understanding each other. The risk of misinterpreting actions and statements is very high.
Negotiations will be very hard and they could be fragile.
They will fail unless a heroic effort is made to help the religions build
relationships and understand each other so that conflict can be resolved or
prevented from escalating.
Some religions preach that members of other religions
will die and go to Hell to suffer forever. It is tempting to take the line that
they mean well but underestimate the psychological damage this can do and the
anger leading to conflict it can engender. It is tempting because it seems a
friendlier assessment of them. It is feared that condemning them as bad could
make them worse. It is more accurate to say that they will use the condemning as
an excuse for becoming worse. It's their responsibility assuming they are not
completely programmed or brainwashed. Also, we all know that something we think
is minor could bring devastation to another person. For example, ingratitude to
a child can damage the child forever. And the hellfire preachers don't actually
need to tell people about Hell. They could encourage people to see through and
shun the sins that lead to Hell. Telling them is about trying to hurt them and
control them. The preachers NEVER mean well. It is improper and irrational and
presumptuous to hold that one form of abuse is more damaging than another. It
depends on the person. A child who is told that if he masturbates and dies he
will rot in Hell forever could suffer far more because of that teaching than he
might over being sexually molested at 7 years of age.
When a religion says that you will be damned forever in
Hell unless you join it, it is waging war on you. It might not be a war like on
earth but it is a war they hope will happen in the afterlife.
Arguing that religion is about peace does not help. It is
irresponsible to encourage such an error. If religion can cause war, it helps
nobody to pretend that it does not. Religion can be used to justify violence as
easily as it can peace. If religion is man-made, man is violent and we can
expect violence in religion.
If each man were his own religion instead of being part of a sect or
denomination there would be no trouble. Organised religion is sectarian by
default. If a Catholic held that his cat was turned into Jesus Christ without
any visible change such as in the Mass he would not be respected. Yet the
Catholics want respect for their notion that the bread and wine at Mass become
Jesus' body and blood.
The seeds of civil war are in religion.