Quietism is a demented heresy based on prayer
A system that says that there is nothing good or godly or holy in the human will
and in human effort is profoundly dangerous. It annihilates self-esteem and any
joy we take in our achievements. One would need to be a Siamese twin to a
counsellor to get through life if it became dominant in the world.
The system requires that in the effort to become right for God to make you
passive and reach the state of passive mystical contemplation of God the dark
night of the soul is a must. God will initially give you enjoyment of the prayer
of quiet and then he will inflict a long and utterly terrible depression on you
in which you feel you are getting nowhere and are and have been worthless and
God has abandoned you. It is evil. Depression is the sense of worthless
existence and cannot be of any use to God unless he is malignant. To make a
person feel worthless is to imply that person is worth nothing and nobody would
have the right to claim that the person is suffering for their good. That would
be loathsome. God is a wholly evil concept. The only way out would be to claim
that depressed people deliberately make themselves feel like that.
The religious experience of the Quietist is a symptom of mental disorder for it
cannot be real.
QUIETISM EXPLICATED
The foremost promoter of the Quietist doctrine in the Roman Church was the
Spanish Roman Catholic priest, Michael Molinos. He seems to have been born in
Sargossa in 1627. He became a doctor of divinity – a trained theologian. He even
converted his friend, Pope Innocent XI to his doctrine – albeit temporarily.
Molinos was found guilty of heresy by the Inquisition and thrown into prison
where he died in 1697.
Molinos held that God must be loved without even the slightest motive of concern
for what is in it for you and loved like this all the time because he is worthy
in himself and not because he is good to you. So far that is Catholic doctrine.
Since you always have some desire to fulfil or satisfy when you use your free
will meaning that you get some pleasure from it, Molinos said that you have to
lose free will by meditation on the fact that God is inside you and attain
complete passivity and become God’s puppet.
Catholic Encyclopaedia http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/12608c.htm discusses
Quietism and says that we should only help ourselves for God wills it and not
because of ourselves and that Quietism is right in that but went too far in the
application of this principle. Catholicism says that if you try to love God with
disinterest in yourself and fail that is okay as long as you do your best with
God’s help to match the ideal so self-interested love for God is tolerable.
Quietists forbade this attitude and had an all or nothing approach. They
considered any acceptance of self-interest to be dangerous and forbidden and
supposed that no good would come of it.
Molinos said that the true Christian would go to Hell for all eternity if it
were God’s will. They won’t hate God there for they have no free will to hate
with so he is not saying the true Christian would hate God forever if that were
God’s will because it wouldn’t be.
Quietism does not forbid happiness or sadness as long as you don’t intend to be
happy or sad for you must intend nothing.
Quietism tells you if you have to will anything or act then do what is easiest
so it can encourage sin. One might pretend to be an aspiring Quietist and get
their sins excused for that reason.
Once God starts controlling you, you cannot sin or merit rewards for all that is
left of you is awareness of God. The power to choose is gone. The Quietist’s
passivity will take the form of being in a tranquil state no matter what happens
to her or him be it suffering, pleasure or temptation. Her or his mind can think
only of God’s presence meaning that she or he acts kind of absent-mindedly all
the time. The Quietist is detached from everything except God.
Quietism need not become pantheism for the person controlled by God could still
be a separate entity, as regards consciousness, from God. It is like what you
experience if you can imagine being awareness and nothing else, you have no
sight, taste, sound, touch or sense of smell. You have no free will or body.
What is left is what we are talking about.
The doctrine teaches that catechisms, set prayers and sacraments are useful only
for the beginner and are to be discarded as soon as God enables one to do so.
But Molinos only permitted external religious acts for deceptive purposes. They
were a cover for his heretics. When the prayer of simple awareness of God kills
free will obviously you start with it and not external actions. This prayer is
an effort but God can make it give way to a passive awareness of the divine
presence. It happens to you like a vision. It ceases to be you making yourself
aware of God but God making you aware of himself.
When one turns to the gospels and sees Jesus recommending prayers like the “Our
Father” and generally not behaving like a Quietist one must conclude that if
Quietism is true then Jesus was not fit to be a Spiritual Director never mind
the Son of God! The Devil must have written the gospels to keep people away from
God. Quietists only go for asceticism when it is easer for them than indulgence
and involves less use of free will.
The doctrine teaches a firm acceptance of predestination for God alone saves you
and not your efforts. But perhaps you have to use the effort of your free will
to get rid of your freedom enabling God alone to save you without your effort so
salvation is your choice. That effort consists of simple concentration on the
presence of God. It is not your choice in the end because only God can let the
meditation destroy the will.
The doctrine recommends severe suffering and penance in the struggle to get God
to save you for these break and help destroy the will. You have to suffer what
you cannot bear. Quietism does not encourage wilful self-torture for those who
have attained the state it labours for.
Quietism says that attachment to grace is attachment to the gift of God that
makes you holy and not God. Christians reply, “But grace is not what is given by
God but is God giving you himself as helper and friend.” But we experience grace
as help and we do not experience this help as God personally. Even if God is his
grace it is impossible to be attached to the help and not God. You can love the
heat in the sun and not the sun though the two are the same. Molinos held that
grace was given to be forsaken. The race that enabled one to become passive and
to which one was not attached was all the grace he cared about.
If the Quietist God existed he would force us all to be passive and unfree when
free will is useless.
QUIETISM REFUTED
If God wants us to give up our free will then he is saying he does not want to
be loved for love can only be caused by a free agent according to the Christian
view. Some Quietists say that for us to forsake free will is to love God and is
an act of love even though it means we cannot love God anymore. It would be more
love if you kept trying to get rid of free will and could not. Quietism runs
down effort which is silly.
Anyway, if you choose to give up free will you want to give it up so how could
you enter the passive state when you have a desire? Desire is supposed to block
the state of love for God. It is not love for you want to do it. Presumably God
himself removes desire for you for you cannot get rid of it yourself. Then why
doesn’t he?
The Quietist says that if anybody is not in the passive state, it is because of
sin and self. If your will is selfish then the closer it gets to the passive
state the worse it is. Why? It is worse for a strong person to do wrong than for
a weak one to do it. It’s excuses for being selfish are withering away meaning
that the strength to resist evil has grown. One way that is true but the other
way it is not true for it is not getting rid of all the sin. The better it seems
to get the worse it gets so no improvement is made in reality. They just seem to
be improved.
Why would God demand love or the annihilation of free will if he is able to
accept the Quietist without it?
Conclusion
Quietism is a disturbing doctrine. But studying it shows how far the Church
wishes people would go in avoiding any form of self-interest.
BOOKS CONSULTED
A CATECHISM OF CHRISTIAN DOCTRINE, CTS, London, 1985
A HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHY, VOL 6, PART II, KANT, Frederick Copleston SJ,
Doubleday/Image, New York 1964
AQUINAS, FC Copleston, Penguin Books, London, 1991
BEYOND GOOD AND EVIL, Friedrich Nietzsche, Penguin, London, 1990
BOOK OF COMMON PRAYER, Association for the Promotion of Christian Knowledge,
Dublin, 1960
CATECHISM OF THE CATHOLIC CHURCH, Veritas, London, 1995
CHARITY, MEDITATIONS FOR A MONTH, Richard F Clarke SJ, Catholic Truth Society,
London, 1973
CHRISTIANITY FOR THE TOUGH-MINDED, Edited by John Warwick Montgomery, Bethany
Fellowship, Minnesota, 1973
CRISIS OF MORAL AUTHORITY, Don Cupitt, SCM Press, London, 1995
EVIDENCE THAT DEMANDS A VERDICT, VOL 1, Josh McDowell, Alpha, Scripture Press
Foundation, Bucks, 1995
ECUMENICAL JIHAD, Peter Kreeft, Ignatius Press, San Francisco, 1996
THE GREAT MEANS OF SALVATION AND OF PERFECTION, St Alphonsus De Ligouri,
Redemptorist Fathers, Brooklyn, 1988
HANDBOOK OF CHRISTIAN APOLOGETICS, Peter Kreeft and Ronald Tacelli, Monarch,
East Sussex, 1995
HONEST TO GOD, John AT Robinson, SCM, London, 1963
HOW DOES GOD LOVE ME? Radio Bible Class, Grand Rapids, Michigan, 1986
IN DEFENCE OF THE FAITH, Dave Hunt, Harvest House, Eugene, Oregon, 1996
MADAME GUYON, MARTYR OF THE HOLY SPIRIT, Phyllis Thompson, Hodder & Stoughton,
London, 1986
RADIO REPLIES, 1, Frs Rumble & Carty, Radio Replies Press, St Paul, Minnesota,
1938
RADIO REPLIES, 2, Frs Rumble & Carty, Radio Replies Press, St Paul, Minnesota,
1940
RADIO REPLIES, 3, Frs Rumble & Carty, Radio Replies Press, St Paul, Minnesota,
1942
REASON AND BELIEF, Brand Blanschard, George Allen and Unwin Ltd, 1974
REASONS FOR HOPE, Ed Jeffrey A Mirus, Christendom College Press, Virginia, 1982
THE BIBLE TELLS US SO, R B Kuiper, The Banner of Truth Trust, Edinburgh, 1978
THE BRIEF OF ST ANTHONY OF PADUA (Vol 44, No 4)
THE GREAT MEANS OF SALVATION AND OF PERFECTION, St Alphonsus De Ligouri,
Redemptorist Fathers, Brooklyn, 1988
THE IMITATION OF CHRIST, Thomas A Kempis, Translated by Ronald Knox and Michael
Oakley, Universe, Burns & Oates, London, 1963
THE LIFE OF ALL LIVING, Fulton J Sheen, Image Books, New York, 1979
THE PRACTICE OF THE PRESENCE OF GOD, Brother Lawrence, Hodder & Stoughton,
London, 1981
THE PUZZLE OF GOD, Peter Vardy, Collins, London, 1990
THE SATANIC BIBLE, Anton Szandor LaVey, Avon Books, New York, 1969
THE SPIRITUAL GUIDE, Michael Molinos, Christian Books, Gardiner Maine, 1982
THE STUDENT’S CATHOLIC DOCTRINE, Rev Charles Hart BA, Burns & Oates, London,
1961
UNBLIND FAITH, Michael J Langford, SCM, London, 1982