NAILING JESUS' TOMB AND SHROUD
Religion says God asks for faith and faith is meant to complement his gift of reason.
Why can't God give us better evidence from archaeology about what Jesus's life and death would have been like?
Why have only two cases of crucifixion remains ever been found?
One was found 1968 in the cemetery Giv’at ha-Mivtar near Jerusalem. There
should be a few more examples from the Holy Land but there is not. The reason is
that if you were crucified you were thrown in the thrash as a criminal and
burnt. As we learn from the forbes.com website, superstition said that the nails
used had magical powers so they stole the remains to get the nails. Also nails
were not cheap and there was money to be made. The theft problem may have caused
the Romans to implement the use of ropes. The victim who was tied to a cross or
nailed was going to die of asphyxiation so the nails didn’t hugely matter.
The next case of crucifixion remains being found was from southern Italy. A man
was just dumped in a grave. He had no belongings with him and the indications
are that nobody had given him any dignity.
In both cases the nail went in through the heel. Two cases so far apart would
appear to show that the Turin Shroud is a fake. It has the nail in the front of
the foot thus it is copying from the crucifixes of the time. Jesus would not
have been allowed a shroud either for that was too dignifying for a man accused
of a state crime.
The New Testament incredibly does not say Jesus was nailed to the cross.
John's Jesus has marks in his hands according to Thomas. But Thomas may
have assumed he was nailed. And the Jesus is a vision not necessarily the
real version of Jesus. The apostles apart from supposedly John were not
even there. Pilate's surprise at Jesus dying so fast as Mark relates, might
indicate that that he was merely tied and should have lasted longer.