MURDER BY NEGLIGENCE? MURDERING THE FAMINE STRICKEN
Christians say God asks us never to ignore the plight of the famine stricken and he gives us the grace to do what he asks. So if there are people starving in the desert it is our fault. That is murder by negligence. If they have supernatural help and are not using it they are the worst murderers of us all.
If I am sure that taking someone’s medicine out of their grasp will kill them
as surely as poison would then I am murdering that person. Some would say that I
am not because death need not result but I am. I mean for that person to die for
if I did not I would try to help so if the person dies I become a murderer. If I
am not a murderer, then to stab a person to death is not killing them for they
don’t have to die- there is a chance they could survive. There would be no such
crime as murder. A murderer is a person who tries to kill or kills and who
intended to kill. I am more of a killer for not feeding the poor in Africa for
that guarantees death than I would be for firing a gun for the victim might
survive.
Killing people is as bad as allowing people to die for the reason killing is bad
is because it results in death.
Is it murder to have and keep what we have while the poor – particularly in
Africa - die of starvation and disease caused by malnutrition?
Religion says that it is not for we have a greater reason to hold on to our
money. But then it says that human life is absolutely valuable – just another
mask it puts on for the traditions of the Church and the Bible, God is believed
to have written the Bible through men, are full of commands that make it a duty
to slaughter murderers and heretics. The Church says that it is better to suffer
horrifically when you are dying instead of being sent on your way. It puts life
above the alleviation of suffering.
Some say it is not murder because there is no malice but indifference. But
indifference is malice for it is refusing to love. It is crueller than plain
malice. The person who hates you will care about you to some extent. The person
who neither loves or hates you does not care what happens to you. The person who
kills because he does not care is as much a murderer as the one who cares about
killing you.
Some say that it is too hard and heroic to sacrifice yourself and your property
to save others so it is not murder if you refuse to do it. But we don’t love our
wealth all the time. And also, it is murder to kill a person even if it is hard
not to kill them. It is hard not impossible. What could be more heroic than to
put God first in all things the way Jesus commanded? Christianity has a
double-standard in relation to heroism. The Sermon on the Mount has Jesus
demanding very difficult standards of morality and he says he doesn’t compromise
for you have to be either for him or against him.
Some even say that when you go out and stab somebody to death you know who you
killed but if you let the missions starve it is different for you don't know who
died so it is not murder! But you can be a murderer if nobody knows you have
killed or who you have killed. Your inaction kills and that makes you a murderer
even if nobody can point to a person and say you murdered him or her.
Some say that you break no law by starving the poor so you are not a murderer if
they die. But law is only a human construct. You still caused deaths and the law
of right and wrong exists regardless of whether or not there is a human law
making a prohibition. Today many believers regard executioners as murderers
though they don’t know who they have killed and though they kill in obedience to
human law.
Others say that I did not cause the starving and that people would be starving
if I never existed. But I am causing the starving by not doing all I can about
it. People would be starving if I never existed but since I exist I should be
making sure they are better off because I existed.
Some say that you don’t know what will be done with the money you donate so you
are not blame if anybody dies because you did not give. Then give yourself and
your life and your time and work among the people. Set up a charity that can
prove that money saves lives.
Many of these excuses for saying we are not murderers for allowing the starving
to die are in the Utilitarian Peter Singer’s book, Practical Ethics, Second
Edition (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1993). The alleged differences
between killing the starving by neglect and murder “need not shake our previous
conclusion that there is no intrinsic difference between killing and allowed to
die” (page 224). How wrong he is. He is just telling lies to get of the
undesirable implications of the truth. He is really approving of murder. Imagine
how unjust then it is for the likes of him to condemn the killer who goes around
stabbing people to death!
It is hypocritical to say that it is not our duty to save the starving with our
money because it is our duty to do what is best. If we deny that we deny that
there is such a thing as right and wrong. The notion of good acts above the call
of duty does that. The Church says that though we say we own things on earth we
actually do not. Everything is God’s property. Would God then want you to have
£1000 in the bank and not give it to the poor as if keeping it was more
important than human life? Christ said in the Sermon on the Mount that if a man
takes what you need from you let him take more than that.
The Roman Catholic believes that nobody can enter Heaven or Purgatory while
adhering to mortal sin, or if you prefer, grave or serious sin. The only place
for them is in the Hell of never-ending torment. The Church lays on us the duty
to correct all mortal sinners for leaving anyone in it is a mortal sin. I think
what comes next is the most effective proof that Roman Catholicism is nourished
by self-deception.
Protestantism holds that conversion to Christ reduces sin so it is as bad for
not doing a better job of reaching sinners.
Murder is just one mortal sin. It is a mortal to do anything that unjustifiably
leads to the death of another. The biggest sins we commit are sins of omission.
For example, we spend money on comforts that should be spent on those who need
it more, whose lives may even depend on it. We have no excuse for God has
promised to take care of all who make great sacrifices for the poor (Matthew
6:31-34). He would be malign if he did not. So we are all murderers. We could
live on very little money and sleep in a shed in order to send what is left to
the poor.
Christendom’s approval of our murderous negligence towards the starving is
unadulterated hypocrisy and is the kind of doctrine that makes murderers. The
clergy of Rome and the daughter churches cruelly prefer building ornate and
extravagant houses of worship to giving the money this makes to the starving or
to spend it on ways to raise funds. Any charity the Church fosters is really an
insult compared to what it could do. It looks more like an attempt to keep
people loyal to her and to keep tongues from wagging than anything resembling
true concern for those dying on starvation or easily curable diseases. The
Church needs to look good. She shows her talk about the value of the person to
be hot air. She says that the person is a temple of God. Would a good God really
prefer a temple of wood and stone to one of flesh and blood? The bad record of
the Church is an encouragement and an inspiration to those who make themselves
think that she is right even when she is wrong and who revel in her evil. The
ways of the Church has worked untold damage and corruption with its bad example.
The hypocrisy of the Church and its defiance of the Sermon on the Mount shows
that the miracles and apparitions it brags about must be from Satan for they
praise the Church. They invite people to holy communion which is only for people
who are clean from serious sin indicating their approval for the accepted
hypocrisy of the Church.
Christians say that life is so precious that euthanasia is wrong. If life is so
precious that nobody should kill you to save you from a lifetime of screaming
and suffering then how can they let doctors give painkillers to dying patients
that will make them die quicker? If life matters most then we have no right to
put the eradication of pain first. They are hypocrites. They let you murder the
famine striken but if you need death to save you from hell on earth they forbid
it to you!