Catholicism manipulates its members
Catholicism says that it is the one true faith community. It claims to be the
only united, holy, Catholic and apostolic Church. It says that if you
suspect/believe/know your religion is wrong and Catholicism is right then you
will go to Hell forever unless you join her. Outside the Church there is no
salvation. The reason you will be damned is because by staying outside of the
Church you are complicit in error or sin or both. You are saying you are okay
with error or sin or both. The only excuse is if you are forced to stay out of
the Church by dangerous psycho relatives or whatever. So if you are complicit
and indirectly responsible for error or sin by refusing to join Catholicism,
then it follows that if you are Catholic and you find out that the Church is not
the religion set up by God to alone teach authorised doctrine and truth and stay
in it you are guilty of grave evil. Religion encourages society to imagine it is
not complicit in evil when it fails to divorce itself from that evil or any
implied and wilful tolerance of it. It does that for its own ends. It is no
wonder that people who let others look at child porn tell themselves they are
not part of the evil of child porn. They make a market for it merely by standing
by and thereby permitting the evil. In the same way, the Catholic who won't dump
the Church though free to do so, is to blame for the problems caused by and the
lies told by the Church.
Christianity needs to be a real divine revelation - if it is man-made then it is
seriously evil no matter how good it might make somebody feel.
Man has no right to say there is a God and make excuses for why that God allows
evil. It is different if God communicates his existence.
Man has no right to say that sins such as idolatry and adultery and abortion etc
are grave evils on his own authority. It is different if God says they are
wrong.
Man has no right to say babies have sin or that unrepentant grave sinners will
suffer for their sin forever in Hell. That would be a terrible doctrine if it is
untrue or if it is based only on what humans say.
We could go on and on.
If we enable the lies and errors of religion and hide them from exposure, we are
as guilty as the religious fraudsters are. No we are worse for we pave the way
for them to be worse than they are or worse than we may ever realise they are.
A test of membership in Catholicism is: "Is what I say or truly believe
agreeable with Church teaching?" Unless there is a bit of faith in the Church,
you cannot really belong to it. Without faith your belonging is superficial. Do
you really belong to your family if you think that family is there to spoil you
and wait on you hand and foot?
Most Catholics are not Catholic believers but cherry-pickers. They make excuses
for why they accept one Church teaching as being from God and not another though
the Church is based on the the idea that God has instructed it on what to
believe. They may even go as far as to think it is okay to disagree with what
God has revealed through the Church and insist that he has more important things
to be concerned about than precision about beliefs. Some cherry-picking
Catholics point to the Church teaching that conscience is primary. The Church
agrees but warns that if a dissenter follows her conscience and chooses against
the Church this is an error to be corrected and not something to be encouraged.
The Church is to help her see the light. The dissenter may be free from sin but
that does not mean she speaks or stands for the Catholic Church in the decision
she has made.
The Church claims to be a hospital for sinners and that everybody is a
missionary and a worker in the hospital. A hospital for sinners has to diagnose
sin as if it were a cancer and the person has to be helped and advised to give
it up. The sin is not to be tolerated in the same way that cancer is
intolerable. The Roman Church then is intolerant of sin by default. If Catholics
tolerate sin it is because they are suffering from the sin of timidity. In
principle, they stand for intolerance of sin. It is what the religion stands for
in principle that must be considered first and foremost when you are deciding
whether to stay in or leave your religion. If you stay while considering the
evil principles to be part of the faith and unchangeable then you are far worse
than the members of the faith that support the evil ignorantly. The danger with
the intolerance of sin is that it demands that people be pressured to attend
Mass on Sunday and avoid masturbation. Many of the things considered to be civil
liberties are banned by the Church and morally judged as sins.
Those who disagree with the Church on serious matters might stay in it because
their sins and heresies are tolerated. Should they feel welcome? No for
tolerance is a mask for disdain. It implies that it is a pity the person has to
be tolerated. The Catholics who refuse to even politely challenge their sins and
heresies are not acting as Catholics. To encourage their Catholicism in any way
by example is asking for intolerance for your sins.
Atheism too can take on the form of being a hospital for those who err and want
religion and God. But it does not believe in sin so its role is to help people
in their personal development as opposed to their moral development.
It is seen as tolerant today to say there are many religious paths to God and
spiritual contentment. Some Catholics say their religion is not the only way to
God or to spiritual contentment but their religion is the right way for them.
But this is not tolerant of Catholicism as it truly is. The Catholic Church
teaches that it is not an item on a religion menu but the religions all are
obligated to disband and join for it is the only religion that worships God
correctly. The Church is nice to them in the hope of helping them to see they
have an obligation.
Catholicism should believe that birth control is evil - it is part of its identity
as a religion. Catholicism can't be the true religion if it is wrong about how
sinful birth control is. But people should separate from it so that there will
be no Catholicism left to believe it. If you belong to or claim to belong to a
religion that should believe evil things, then even if it doesn't, you are being
evil and supporting evil. A religion that doesn't understand or admit or see how
evil it is meant to be is a religion that is being praised for going against
itself. It is no compliment to praise it for you are praising ignorance and
disobedience. Separate from it.
Many stay in the Church for they are influenced by the idea that sincerity
matters and not truth. If you err even with the best of intentions you still do
harm. You harm your power to perceive the truth every time you err. You harm
yourself though you feel no pain. You harm others by giving an example of error
to them. To err is to take the side of error even if you never get the chance to
express and live out your error. If somebody is wrong but sincere we can praise
them for the sincerity but not for being wrong.
The view that if somebody has harmful religious beliefs that it is none of our
business as long as they are sincere is wrong. If it would be our business if
they were insincere then the fact that they are sincere makes them more
dangerous. It is even more our business then! At least if they are insincere
they know they are wrong and on the side of wrong. The whole point of it being
our business is stopping the harm. It is not about interfering with their
intentions as intentions for we can't change anybody's intentions for them.
Belief in God endangers morality. If you suppose that the belief has no
relevance to morality then it follows that emphasising God like religionists do
is bad. The more you emphasise, the worse it is.
It is our business if they live their lives as if God gave them their beliefs
when he didn't or couldn't have. They are not islands - their lives affect them
and affect us.
Many of those who say religion leads to wars actually mean Christianity and
Judaism and Islam do that. Each one of the trio claims to be exclusively God's
people and to have his only true creed. Being part of those faiths is not a
thing that ought to be taken for granted. It is serious business if not for us
then for people of the future.
A religion is not a community but a theological system that forms a community.
To say otherwise is to imply that your wider community is not a community at all
for it is comprised of people of different faiths and non-faiths.
Liberals do not believe in respecting their religions teaching in full. Yet they
have the hypocrisy to advocate respect for religion.
Cherry-picking is a scientific sin. You cannot say God wrote the entire Bible
and then reject any command he gave because you don't like it. You believe the
Bible is God's word or you do not.
Catholicism has lied to its flock. It has distorted evidence that it is the true
religion. It makes dangerous claims such as that it is better to expose yourself
to AIDS than to wear a condom. It conditions people who have sex outside
marriage to feel they are severely damaged because if such sex is harmless or
can be harmless the Church has a problem explaining how it can be sinful! It
expects people to take the word of men, the apostles and bishops, that those who
die in serious sin will be damned forever. The Church accuses those people of
deserving all that because men ask it to. It has raped and abused children and
been an oppressive force in society when it was powerful enough. Yet many
Catholics send their children to its schools to have them conditioned as they
once were. Yet many Catholics have their children baptised into Church
membership. Yet many Catholics stay in the Church. The question is, what does it
take to make them consider quitting Catholicism or to quit Catholicism? Why do
they not look for a kinder and better religion? A religion that claims to be
holy as Catholicism should be the best religion. The sinfulness of the Church is
worse than that of any other faith. The Church exaggerates the seriousness of
sin. It follows that if you exaggerate the badness of sin you intend to be worse
than the next person even if both of you do equal damage.
To stay in the Catholic Church because you like the people is really saying that
Lutherans or Anglicans or whatever don't have members who are equally nice and
good.
There are members of the Catholic Church who act as if nothing at all can put
them off practicing their faith. They still pay money to the Church and justify
its existence by attending Mass no matter how much the Church lies to them,
abuses them or innocent people or how unpopular Catholicism is. They even try to
turn their babies into Catholics. Fundamentalism is simply supporting a religion
no matter what. That is extremism. Extremism that leads religionists to be so
stubborn is the same attitude that leads religionists to kill heretics or
pagans.
Religion encourages the notion of dogma - refusing to change one's mind in the
face of the evidence that one should. Human nature being stubborn makes it
inevitable that some people will do that. But as many if not more will. Indeed,
if most religionists were that obstinate the paganism that enchanted the whole
world would still be as strong. And a person might only act obstinate because
they are in denial that they have already changed their minds. The perception
that religious people will not change their minds is really a form of
sectarianism - it is pre-judging them. Speak to the religious person instead of
assuming they will not change. Dedicated Catholics have become Jehovah's
Witnesses so people do change.
It must be assumed that as most people would want the right to be able to make
informed decisions that all would want it. People would agree with, “It is better
to know the truth and have to painfully deal with it than to be deluded and
happy.” Do not be afraid to help a person challenge their own religious beliefs.
The Roman Catholic Church as a faith has deceived the people and especially the
poorest and most vulnerable members of society. There is no such thing as a good
Catholic. No. What is called a good Catholic is a good human being who has the
Catholic label. The point is that it is people who are good - not religions. It
is people who make up charities that look after the poor not charities. Same
principle!
Love the sinner and hate the sin means that you must judge the sin not the
sinner. That is lying that the sin is not the sinner. You sin because you are a
sinner and you are not a sinner because you sin. Your outwardly bad and
deliberate acts only show the kind of person you are. To hate the sin is to hate
the sinner for sin by definition describes a person's sinfulness. Yet the lie
that the sin is separate from the sinner is the foundation of religion and its
manipulative charm. It is an insult to the person you hurt for people to tell
you that you are perfect for you are not your sins. One thing is for sure, when
an organisation or religion is based on hypocrisy such as loving sinners and
hating sins there should be no need for that religion. Hypocrisy by definition
is not needed. Anything that has no right to exist has no right to be the cause
of fighting and bigotry even if it says it forbids those things. Anything there
is no need for should disband if people fight and hate over it. Systems of bad
example are to blame for all the evil their members do over them even if they do
not tell them to do it.
People who are charmed by the Church's offer of forgiveness forget that the
Church has to judge them as people who have done evil and who should be punished
before it can forgive. Forgiving and judging go together.
Some say the Catholic Church should be ditched because it is a hate
organisation. It is indeed a hate organisation but because its flock are
apathetic or cherry-pickers who want religion to suit them it cannot implement
or show the full force of that hate. Do not say then, "Many Catholics are
reasonable, liberal and decent people thus it is a mistake to label the Church
as a hate organisation." They may be Catholic but it does not follow that
everything they do and say is Catholic.