DID SOME OF THE JACK THE RIPPER VICTIMS KNOW THE KILLER?
In 1888, the most infamous murders of all time took place in London’s East End. Five prostitutes, destitute women who knew of no other way to survive, were killed and slaughtered by a supposedly unknown killer who bears the nickname Jack the Ripper.
Evidence that some of the Victims Knew their Killer
Detective Inspector Edmund Reid thought that only Nichols, Chapman, Eddowes and
Kelly were slain by the Ripper. He worked hard to find the killer but decided
“here are the only known facts. The whole of the murders were done after the
public houses were closed; the victims were all of the same class, the lowest of
the low, and living within half a mile from each other; all were killed in the
same manner. That is all we know for certain – my opinion is that the
perpetrator of the crimes was a man who was in the habit of using a certain
public house, and of remaining there until closing time. He would leave with one
of the women. One thing is to my mind quite certain, and that is that he lived
in the district. I challenge anyone to produce a tittle of evidence of any kind
against anyone.”
The five murder victims may have known each other. They didn’t live far apart.
These women walked the streets later than most prostitutes which makes it very
likely that they were known to each other. Women of the night tended to know
each other especially prostitutes that worked after dark (page 122, Jack the
Ripper’s Black Magic Rituals).
Some experts believe that Mary Jane Kelly and Annie Chapman knew one another and
were friends. Their source is the People newspaper November 11th 1888. Also
Kelly and Chapman lived on the same street – Dorset Street (page 189, Jack the
Ripper, Scotland Yard Investigates).
Another newspaper claimed that Catherine Eddowes had used a shed at 26 Dorset
Street to sleep in (page 190, Jack the Ripper, Scotland Yard Investigates). If
so Mary Kelly could have known her. The Telegraph claimed Eddowes had
lived one time in Miller's Court where Kelly was murdered.
Did they know the Ripper?
Mrs Long saw Annie Chapman with a man at 5.30 am near the backyard where Annie
was later found murdered. At about that time roughly a woman’s cry of, “No!” and
a bump was heard against the fence of number 29. Annie was found at 6.00 am. The
bruises on Annie could indicate that she hit herself against the fence. Why did
she call out, “No!”? The Ripper worked here in broad daylight.
Despite the possibility that the thump was something else and the “No!” was not
from Annie it is unlikely. Nobody came forward to explain them in any different
way and she was attacked about the time these sounds were heard.
One oddity is that Mrs Hardiman thought she heard footfall in the back yard and sent her teenage son William out about 6 am and he reported seeing nothing.
A man dusting the street reported a man smeared in blood making away from the
crime scene at the time Chapman was murdered.
How could Mrs Long who saw people going to and from all the time to the extent
that she would have paid no attention have been so interested in Annie and the
man with her? She even listened to what they said. The man having said, “Will
you?” and Annie answering, “Yes.” She had a good look at the man. That was
strange. It is hard to believe that she hadn’t seen them together before. If she
had, that would explain her interest. She was afraid to say too much in case the
man would come after her next. If the man had been a Jew there was a danger of
reprisals from the Jews if she said who he was. She knew more than she ever
said.
The way to the backyard was through an occupied building past a staircase. It is
terrifying to know that the Ripper and Annie passed out that way to the yard.
The Ripper had evidently been there before which explains why he was so
confident but still it was a big risk.
Some specks of blood after the Chapman murder were seen in the passage from the
street into the backyard of Number 29. The rather far-fetched explanation was
that cases had been carried through it which had come into contact with the
blood in the back yard. That was the explanation endorsed by the Manchester
Guardian. The Evening News said the spots were thick. You would wonder who
persuaded the police the blood did not come from the killer and why. It seems
that Chapman died shortly before 6 am when she was discovered by John Davies. It
is hard to fathom how the killer went about in daylight with hands stained with
blood when there was a tap in the year that he never went near. Dr Philips
however was clear that there was no other blood and he said he checked
carefully.
If there was blood then it probably came from the killer as he departed. The
notion that Chapman was killed on the street and carried into the yard is too
much.
Elizabeth Stride was found holding her cachous in her hand. That she didn’t
struggle or drop it indicates that she trusted her attacker and was totally
taken by surprise when he put his hands round her throat. She had turned down a
client earlier that night. Sex only takes minutes on the street so why did she
do this? It may have been because she was saving herself for a special client,
the Ripper. If not, then she must have trusted the man who was the Ripper when
she went into the Yard with him. Either way she must have known and trusted him
especially since she knew of the recent murders and after she had been assaulted
by another man on the street minutes before.
Eddowes was seen laying a friendly familiar hand on the Ripper's chest just
minutes before her murder. She did this despite the hue and cry over Stride
which she must have known about. She knew the killer.
Joseph Barnett, Mary’s ex-partner, testified that Mary Kelly was afraid of a man
or men. He said that she asked him to read the stories of the murders to her
(page 104, Jack the Ripper’s Black Magic Rituals). Why did he say this? Her door
was easily opened through a hole in the window. Would she have left her room so
open to burglary and the risk of attack had she been afraid of someone? Barnett
was undoubtedly lying. Barnett probably knew who the killer was and wanted to
point to him but in such a way that he wouldn’t get the blame for saying who it
was. But its possible that Kelly was assured by Barnett that the Ripper would
never touch her so she might have been afraid of the Ripper but not afraid
enough to make sure she was safe in her room. Kelly may have known the Ripper if
Barnett her lover knew him.
Kelly could read herself and would have and when Barnett still had to read the
Ripper murder accounts to her it shows she was obsessed with them a little. This
was likely if she knew the killer.
Why did the Ripper always take the money he paid the women for sex back? The
women usually asked for the money and got it before they went with the man. The
man was a lot less likely to pay if he got the goods first. No matter how much
he was in a hurry, he always took time to search their clothes and get the money
off them again. He always stole whatever money they made – the tale of the
farthings at Annie Chapman’s feet however was a myth. The stealing indicates
that the Ripper did indeed kill the canonical five victims. And the Ripper
wasn’t exactly extremely poor. He looked like a shabby gentleman and sometimes
dressed far finer than that. What happened when he had got other women to the
killing sites but wasn’t able to kill them for one reason or another? Did he
have sex with them and then rob them? Hardly likely. It looks more like the five
women he murdered trusted him to pay after sex. They knew him. They liked him.
Our suspect had fallen into hard times or was fearful of his finances getting
worse and would have needed to take the money back if he had given them any.