WHEN JESUS ASKED FOR THE LAW TO BE KEPT TO THE VERY IOTA
The Gospel of Matthew contains most of the proofs that the Law of Moses was just
as obligatory for Christians as it was for the Hebrews that Moses gave it to.
Nobody wants to think about that for the Law is very threatening and hateful and
for every nice statement there are hundreds of cruel and bloody ones.
In Matthew 5, Jesus says that he has come to fulfil the Law and the Prophets,
the two major sections in the Old Testament, not to prohibit them. Then he says
that not an iota shall pass from them. He is promising to preserve the
perfectly. Then he asserts that it is a sin to break or abolish even one of
their commandments.
The word for fulfil in the original text is the Greek word pleroo. Pleroo
appears in Matthew 13:48 where a net is pleroo or filled up with fish. Pleroo
means that instead of changing or cancelling the Law he would fill it up until
it could hold no more which is the same as saying he will expand the Law and
make it complete (page 16, The World Ahead, November December 1998, Vol 6, Issue
6).
He is saying that he will not do away with the rules in the Law. He said some
stuff after that many take to be in contradiction of the Law. But he said he
would not do away. So what comes after must not be interpreted so as to be
supposed to be in contradiction to the Law.
Some have said that when Jesus said after he came to fulfil the Law that anybody
who breaks the smallest of the commandments will be the lowest in the kingdom of
Heaven he meant the commandments he gave later on. But when he was after
speaking about the Law his listeners who were naïve and irreligious would
certainly have assumed that the commandments had to be those of the Law. So,
Jesus condemned people who broke the Law of Moses.
He did not simply mean, “I have not come to do away with the text of the Law but
to fulfil it”. If he had he would have put the word text in in case his
listeners who were ordinary people would misunderstand. The Law is not the text
or it’s wording but is expressed in letters and words and in sentences. Jesus
would not have talked as if he was expected to do away with the text and replace
it for nobody expected anything so absurd.
“He did not actually say that it would be a sin for him to repeal the divine
laws,” reply the theologians who want to use this as an excuse for denying my
natural interpretation of what Jesus said. But he never said, “It is a sin for
anybody except me to alter the commandments of the Law”. He meant that even he
himself was excluded from the privilege of altering the Law.
Jesus said that our keeping the law or righteousness must be better than that of
the scribes and Pharisees to enter the kingdom of Heaven (Matthew 5:20). We must
obey the Jewish Law better than them. He did not like the Jews preferring the
letter of the Law to the spirit of the Law. For example, the Jews read in the
Law to love their neighbours. They interpreted this as meaning that they must
love only those who live around them. But they did not understand that God meant
that everybody is your neighbour. The misinterpretation is the letter of the Law
and the real meaning is the spirit of the Law. If you take it overly literally
it becomes the letter of the Law that you are obeying. Forget about the words
and concentrate on the meaning.
Jesus said later that since the Law and the Prophets commanded that you do to
others what you want them to do to you, you must obey (7:12). He categorically
stated that the Law was still in force and said that this rule was a summary of
the Law and the Prophets. A summary that drops out the parts is not a summary at
all so Jesus was saying the Law should still be obeyed. If the summary rules out
the brutal laws of the Law and the Prophets then it is not a summary.
The Church says that Jesus died for sinners to make up for sins. But it believes
he didn’t need to die for all he had to do was obey God in our place and each
act is full payment for our disobedience. The Church holds that since Jesus was
God or supremely special to God only one act of obedience was needed to remove
sin so Jesus made up for all sins simply by being conceived. To become man
knowing that you have to give your life for sinners on the cross would be the
same value as dying on the cross. After the atonement, Jesus told his disciples
to obey everything the scribes and the Pharisees tell them but not to emulate
their hypocrisy (Matthew 23:2,3). And their teachers preached that Jesus must be
ready and willing to kill and give an eye for an eye for the Law says so.
Christ castigated the Jews for not obeying God’s word when it demanded that
anybody who did not respect parents had to be put to death (Matthew 15). He told
them they were setting aside the wishes of God which would not have been the
case if this law had been cancelled for then it would not have been there to
have been set aside.
On the strength of God’s own authority, Jesus commanded the love of God and of
neighbour (Matthew 22). He said that to him these meant what the Law commanded
for all it demands depends on these two principles. In other words, he wanted
the Law to be observed in full for its nature was love.
The people were told by Jesus to obey the scribes and Pharisees because they
preached the Torah. He denounced them as evil men so he would not have told them
to do what they say when their ideas were only their own reasoning. “Observe and
practice all they tell you; but do not do what they do, for they preach, but do
not practice” (Matthew 23:3).
Jesus told a young Jewish man to keep the commandments if he wanted to enter
Heaven (Matthew 19:17). Christians say that this is not a proof that the Law is
still in force for he went on to say he should keep the moral rules forbidding
stealing and adultery and so on or the ten commandments in other words. But
Jesus mentioned only a few commandments and quoted them as some but not all
examples so he would have meant the other laws in and out of the Ten
Commandments too. He certainly did not mean the man to think that only a couple
of rules were binding. When he was speaking to a Jew he would have been
understood to have referred to the entire Law and he was preaching obedience to
the Law during his ministry. And because he said commandments instead of Ten
Commandments he must have meant the entire law. Remember too that the Ten
Commandments were just a summary of the Law of Moses meaning that to approve
them is to approve of all the other laws too. The first commandment, You shall
have no God but me – or you shall put nothing else before me and will obey me,
enjoins obedience to the Law of God, the whole Law. It is a part of the Law
after all.
Jesus said we should treat others as we want them to treat us FOR this fulfils
the Law of Moses and the Prophets (Matthew 7:12). He tells us we should like to
be stoned to death if we deserve it. This line says it all.
The Law is still to be obeyed.
.