KANT and FAITH
The great philosopher Kant argued that if you do an action that would make life
impossible if everybody did it then you know it is immoral. You don't need a
God to tell you much less command you. In fact commanding would be too
forceful and a form of abuse. It would be cynical. It would be
encouraging those who worry about the consequences of being bad not being bad.
Religion is about faith community. Kant's ethic is individualist in the sense that each person has to consider if an action could be done by all people. So the individual discovers the moral law by this technique. Again God is shut out.
Not surprisingly then Kant regarded prayer and going to
Church as degrading. He detested it when people went to Church.
The main reason was that Kant thought that everybody must look at reason says
and reason it out for themselves. They are not to take his word for it or
anybody's. It is just like a teacher may have to teach you maths but until you
start using your head to see if he is right - and you will see it.
Christians ridicule Kant by saying he thought that anybody who disagrees with
him is not rational in so far as they do so. Kant did not say it was about
disagreeing with him. He denied that it was. It was about disagreeing with the
principles of reason that anybody could work out.
Kant held that reason gave us two principles to live by. One was to make others
happy. The other was to gain one's full freedom. He held however that reason
cannot theoretically prove these beliefs. It only points to them as reasonable
assumptions to make. No other assumption makes as much a sense.
Kant decided that the two principles were achievable for it is unreasonable to
try and be perfectly good and make others happen if it cannot be done. It must
be at least possible if not guaranteed to work.
The basics of morality for Kant were not a leap of faith but a leap of reason.
Is Kant right to say that we can be moral as long as we do what we perceive to
be right? But you do the thinking beforehand, and you cannot do the act and
think it at the same time. There is a distance between you and your "knowledge"
and your belief at that time. Thus we have refuted the Kantian and Catholic
doctrine that you cannot do wrong unless you know what you are doing when you do
it.
I have consulted Keith Ward's More Than Matter (Lion, 2010).