WAS JUSTIN MARTYR RELIABLE OR A PROPAGANDIST?
Jesus Christ reputedly died and rose again in the thirties of the first century. A Christian, called Justin Martyr wrote in defence of the Christian religion in the century after. Justin's writings are used in defence of the Christian claim that Jesus really existed and lived as the four gospels say.
In his Dialogue with Trypho, Chapter XVII, we find Justin accusing the Jews of sending missionaries all over the world just to make trouble for Christians and slander them. This is impossible to believe for the Jews did not care what non-Jews thought. Why did the Jews pick on Christians and not Christ? The passage gives no hint that they went about slandering Jesus and saying the resurrection was a hoax which indicates that the Jews knew Jesus never existed. Justin wants to forget the Jews believed that. He says the Jews still persecute Christ but Christians hold that to persecute Christians is to persecute Christ.
When Justin claimed that the Old Testament had been
altered, he lost any right to say that the Bible had no contradictions (Chapter
LXV) and that it proved Christ was born and was the saviour. Trypho would
certainly have pointed that out to him but Justin left that point out. Trypho
would also have objected that had Jesus been the Christ Jesus would have
restored the Bible. Justin quoted some allegedly missing scriptures (Chapter
LXXII). One from Esdras merely says that there is a saviour and if the people
turn away from him they shall be laughed at. Another from Jeremiah says that
somebody is like a lamb for the slaughter and the Jews will say they should kill
him. Another says the Lord came down to raise his people from the dead. A line
about God reigning from the wood has supposedly been cut out of a psalm. Not one
of these lost scriptures necessarily proves that God became man or anything
about Jesus.
Chapter XXIX says that anybody baptised in the Holy Spirit does not need the
other “baptism” of circumcision. Jesus would always have had the Holy Spirit and
was still circumcised. Justin is contradicting the gospels that Jesus was
circumcised.
Chapter XXXIV denies that a Psalm is about Solomon and says it is about Christ
for it is about somebody who is adored by all kings and who rules the world.
Quoting this Psalm would have been useless for Trypho would say it proved
nothing for Christ did not achieve these things yet. So Justin is saying that
all kings adored the man Christ some time in the past and that Christ was
emperor of the world meaning that Jesus lived long long before the time period
the gospels give. This is a clear contradiction of the New Testament and proves
it was censored or not regarded as infallible at the time. Trypho never replied
to this for it was so silly and impossible to disprove.
In Chapter XXXIX we read, “Trypho said, ‘prove to us that the man who according
to you was crucified and rose into Heaven is the Messiah of God. For you have
proved by the scriptures you have recited before that the scriptures say the
Christ must suffer and return to rule all nations. Show us that your Christ is
the Christ”. Justin replies, “It has been proved sirs. It has been proven to
those who hear and who have heard what you have heard and accepted by you. But I
return to what I was discussing and will give the other proof later to you in
case you say I cannot prove”.
Trypho says that the Christians are SAYING Jesus was nailed to the cross
indicating that there was no evidence for it but their word. Justin, in reply,
tells the Jews that the prophecies are proof enough. In other words, the
prophecies must have been fulfilled so even if there is no evidence for Christ
we know from the prophecies that the Christ story is true and can work out the
details of the story. In other words, the prophecies are the only real record of
Christ. In other words, if the interpretation is wrong then Jesus Christ never
existed.
Later in Chapter XLVIII Trypho challenges Justin to prove Christ as he promises
and he complained that it was “all very paradoxical and no proof is possible. It
is when you say that this Messiah existed as God before the origin of time and
then that he agreed to be born and become a man and yet that is not just a man
this is more than paradoxical but foolish – that is how I see it”. If you
analyse this you see that the traditional claim of the Church that Trypho was
disputing the idea of a God waiting for a long time to become man is false for
Trypho as a Jew would have known that the same complaint could be made about God
being so slow in sending the Messiah be he God or not. There is no absurdity in
God waiting for the right time. As a scholar, Trypho would have known that the
similar thought that it is too silly to believe that God would have waited so
long before making the world was flawed. He is rejecting the idea that the
Messiah was born as a man and could be a divine being for a God made man would
only be a God pretending to be a vulnerable man. He is implicitly denying that
Jesus could do miracles and rise from the dead. Justin replies, “I am unable to
prove that he existed before his birth as a son of the creator of all things and
that he was God and born man of a virgin. But I have proved that he is the
Christ”. Justin means only the Old Testament proves Christ to have been the
Messiah and Justin is denying that there are any books or proofs that Jesus was
a God and existed before he was born which is a challenge to the traditional
interpretation of the gospel of John which appears at first glance to support
the traditional theology that there are three persons in God and the second
person the Word or Son became man. Justin even says that Christ is the Christ
whoever he is. He does not know Jesus at all or anything about him. He has to
learn about the mysterious Jesus from Old Testament prophecy.
Justin cannot use the resurrection to prove that Jesus is God even on the basis
that if Jesus said he was God and God would prove it by raising him then Jesus
was proven to be God by the resurrection. Justin did not have the uncensored
gospels. And even without them he should still have been able to formulate an
argument for the resurrection by arguing on the basis of history and the
integrity of the alleged witnesses to the resurrection.
And Justin was not thinking about proving that Christ was born of a virgin but
that Christ was born for born is the whole point of what he said. It’s the main
point. He meant, “I cannot prove that he was born – it just happened to be from
a virgin”. Trypho's request for proof that Jesus really fulfilled the prophecies
is not given and in chapter XLIX Justin goes back to proving from prophecy that
Elijah in John anointed Jesus but never uses history to prove the event really
happened as prophesied. Trypho answers that the prophecy used to prove this is
ambiguous and Justin argues that there was nobody else but John and Jesus to
fulfil the prophecy. He does not use facts to prove Jesus fulfilled prophecy but
uses prophecy to work out the alleged facts. The fact that he indicates that
John and Jesus were the only candidates implies that his view was that the
baptism in the Jordan was more than just a dip in the water and John hearing a
voice and seeing a dove light on Jesus. It seems to imply that there was a
coronation and something that nobody else could imitate. It was some kind of
grand public event and was unique for anybody could go for a dip and say the man
who baptised them was Elijah and that the Holy Spirit came down. Justin rejected
and did not know or accept the story of what happened at the Jordan that we have
in the gospels.
Chapter LXIX says that the Devil created the legend of Hercules with his divine
origin from Jove and his world travels and magic strength, ascension into Heaven
to create a counterfeit of the life of Christ so that Hercules seems to imitate
Christ. But Jesus did not travel the world or have great physical strength
according to the Gospels so Justin is eliminating the gospels whether he knew
them or not as reliable records of the life of Jesus. This would be strong
evidence that Jesus may not have existed for the gospels are the only things
that stand between belief in Jesus as a person and denial of his reality. The
reason Justin brings all these parallels between Jesus and the gods up is
because he wants to convince Trypho that the Devil and his legions know the
prophecies of the Old Testament mean what Justin says they mean. So to ruin
things for Jesus, Satan and his minions invent other Jesus’s such as Hercules.
The outrageously ridiculous thesis in Chapter LXX that the mystery religion of
Mithras was based on the true interpretation of Daniel and Isaiah but distorted
is a sure sign that Justin was extremely embarrassed by the similarity between
Christ and Mithras. He wanted to deflect Trypho from going into the charge that
Christians used pagan myths when inventing their Jesus. And it worked. Trypho
did not use this line of argument. Trypho would have known to a certain extent
that Christianity was a copy of paganism but would have found it difficult to
answer Justin’s hint that it was independent. The pagans did not esteem Daniel
and Isaiah that much and their legends all came from nature myths - for example,
the sun setting and rising suggested dying and rising gods.
Justin devoted Chapters CVI and CVII to proving that the end of Psalm 22 and the
story of Jonah showed that Jesus would rise again. Neither prove any such thing.
Justin wrote in Chapter CVIII that though Jesus had told the Jews that he would
perform the sign of Jonah meaning the resurrection they would not believe the
resurrection report and maintained that the body had been stolen and the
apostles were lying. Justin made no effort to prove that the resurrection
happened. His logic was if the Old Testament said the Messiah would rise then
Jesus must have risen and it is on this logic that he tries to persuade Trypho.
That is why Trypho does not bother answering the objection. The objection could
only be answered on the basis that the gospel stories were verifiable and
convincing and this was not done so both Justin and Trypho did not regard the
gospels as wholly important if they existed. It seems more probable that they
did not know the historical parts of the gospels at all. Justin denied the
gospel evidence when he said that prophecy proves the resurrection when what he
should have been doing was proving the resurrection and then that it was
prophesised.
Justin claims to prove that the Old Testament predicted that the Gentiles would
be more open to the gospel than the Jews who would mostly turn away. There is
something very dodgy going on when the people who would have known Jesus best
were so dead set against him. The Jews were a lot less addicted to material
pleasures than the Gentiles and had a rigid moralistic religion so psychology
tells us that they should have been easier to convert. But the case may be that
they knew too much about Justin’s non-existing Jesus to be converted.
Justin showed he did not have the Book of Acts when he told Trypho that you
could not be a Jew and a Christian at the one time. It wasn’t likely then that
he had Luke’s gospel either for one goes with the other and the end of Luke says
the apostles never left the Temple for they were so busy worshipping after Jesus
departed from them into Heaven.
In Chapter CXLII, Trypho tells Justin that it was not the intention of his or
Justin’s companions to discuss what they discussed. Trypho says he is pleased
with the conversation and that more discussions like that would be of service in
understanding the Old Testament scriptures. Before they left Justin told them he
hoped they would come to believe that Jesus is the Messiah of God. So he had
failed to convince them. Evidently, Trypho was impressed only by the ingenuity
but not the conclusions of Justin’s Old Testament exegesis.
Justin says the apostles wrote memoirs of the life of Jesus but he never tells
us what was in them or if he used them in his research into the life of Jesus.
Justin was dishonest because he said that when God said that he gives nobody his
glory but keeps it for himself for he is the only God and that when he gave
Christ his glory the solution to the contradiction is a mystery (Chapter LXV).
When he sees or thinks he sees a contradiction he pretends it is not there.
Justin seriously contradicted the gospels when he said this for had Christ been
God there would have been no contradiction. But Justin believed that Christ was
not God but was another God. This is plain. His attitude shows that the early
Church had no scriptures but the Old Testament and anything else was just a
book, useful, but just a book that could be right or wrong and had no binding
authority on the Church. This shows that early Christianity was not based on
evidence but on Old Testament interpretation and opinion.
Justin backed up Trypho’s unbelief in the reality of Christ without meaning to.
Justin was the Christian’s first real apologist. This individual is eulogised by
Christians and his eccentricities and fanaticism are conveniently papered over.