Christians Kept Jewish Feasts and are still obligated to
Summary:
There is no definite statement in the New Testament that the Jewish feasts are
done away. They had to be kept under obligation to divine law. A God who does
them away would make it clear. Acts 20:6 shows the apostles still observed
Judaism and the feasts after they were supposedly done away. The proof texts
against the keeping of feasts refer to man-made feasts not the divinely
instituted feasts of the Law of Moses. See Galatians 4:10. Galatians was not
written against Jews but against heretical Jews who said that you have to be
circumcised to get into Heaven. Old Testament doctrine however teaches that
circumcision is not about Heaven but about the right to be Jewish and to inherit
the Holy Land.
________________________
Christians say that Jesus and the apostles revealed God's will that the
Jewish feasts are no longer binding on us. As Jesus took care of what the feasts
pointed to they are not needed anymore. If we cannot find any proof of this
doctrine in the New Testament that means the feasts are still binding under
divine law. God cannot make laws and then permit us to ignore them unless he
clearly reverses them.
The real reason the feasts are no longer kept is because of the Catholic
Church's delusion that it has the authority to decree that they must be dropped.
The Christians kept the feast of Pentecost when they with the apostles were in
Jerusalem after Jesus had departed this world (Acts 2). They had lives elsewhere
so they are in Jerusalem to keep the feast and they must have been together to
celebrate the feast. Big get-togethers attract attention and they were scared
showing how deeply they felt about celebrating the feast. Now, they all believed
they were in great danger from the haters of Jesus so if they had thought that
the feast had been done away they would not have been in Jerusalem which was the
most dangerous place of the lot. They believed it was their duty to be there
despite the risk. If it had not been their duty it would have been a sin for
them to take the risk. The resurrection had removed some of their previous
unreasonable cowardice so Jesus must have told them to keep the feast after his
resurrection. It did not matter where they were when the Spirit came like he did
that day so they were not sent to Jerusalem to wait for him. If the apostles had
expected the Spirit to come and push them out to preach on the streets to an
audience that was likely to be vicious and hostile they wouldn’t have set foot
in Jerusalem. If they had not been frightened they would have been out
evangelising before the Spirit arrived. They were there to celebrate the
festival.
Christians preach, “Paul said that Jesus our Passover has been sacrificed so
that we should keep the Feast of Unleavened Bread (1 Corinthians 5:6-8). And
Paul uses leavened and unleavened to picture unholiness and holiness
respectively. When they are metaphors so is the reference to the keeping of the
feast. He did not mean literal Passover, literal leaven or literal unleavened
bread. He was not telling us to celebrate the Passover or the Feast of
Unleavened Bread here. Keep the feast means act as if you are celebrating that
Jewish feast but are eating not unleavened bread but spiritual food or grace”.
But if the leaven and unleavened bread are symbols then Paul could still tell us
to celebrate the feast and mean a literal feast. He could want the eating of the
unleavened bread to represent renouncing leaven or evil. The principle of take
the simplest meaning tells us that the feast is literal. We are to celebrate the
feast of Unleavened Bread.
In the Book of Acts it is strongly suggested that the apostles continued in the
feasts (20:6). There, it is reported that Paul who had the apostles’ approval of
his religious actions and others sailed from Phillipi after the Feast of
Unleavened Bread. This is such an odd detail for Acts had no interest in time
structures in mundane matters and when it was not relevant. When it is stated so
apparently foolishly the only explanation is that it is hinting that they sailed
after they kept the festival which would make sense of it all and fit into the
pattern of Acts.
Galatians 4:10 has Paul criticising the Galatians because they observed holy
days, holy months and years. This means pagan celebrations not the ones of the
Torah because of the Torah never commanded holy months. The Torah only declared
that the weekly Sabbath and seven annual feasts are to be kept holy and of
course the Jubilee or Sabbatical Year. The previous verse condemns the Galatians
for going back to serving Gods that were not Gods. Then Paul tells them that
they are going as far as to bring back the holidays. This proves that he meant
pagan holidays. Re-introducing God’s feasts could not be worse than serving
other Gods. Christians merely assume that he means Jewish feasts for if the
people had been instructed to carry on with them they would have known he didn’t
mean these feasts.
Paul’s desperation to get to Jerusalem by Pentecost reveals that he wanted to go
there to keep the feast (Acts 20:16). He either wanted to catch the festival or
to meet people there. But he had plenty of delegates and if he wanted to preach
then why didn’t he do it in Asia which he bypassed? So it was the festival he
wanted to keep.
The fast in Acts 27:9 is the fast of the feast of the Atonement. We are told
that it was kept on the ship Paul was on. The fast caused danger we are told.
Paul was not excluded in the text so it is probable that he fasted as well. He
would not have been on the boat if it meant being pressurised into abetting or
doing something wrong. He did not think it was wrong to cause trouble over
keeping a fast.
Christians are still to follow the feasts. But they have new additional meaning
for them. To the Jew, the Passover, for example, was a memorial of the saving
power of God when he killed the firstborn of Egypt to persuade that country to
let his people go. To the Christian it means the same thing but also that God
killed his son to free the world from sin. All the feasts can be used as
reminders of various events in Christian salvation history.
God said in the Law of Moses that it was a sin not to keep the feasts. God does
not invent sins so it must really have been wrong to do so. God cannot change
right into wrong so the feasts must still be for keeping. Their moral purpose
was for instilling and expressing gratitude therefore feasts are morally
required.
Jesus told the Devil that man lives by every word from the mouth of God (Luke
4:4). He meant the Old Testament scriptures. He meant that everything they
command should be done. The Devil would have understood him to mean every man
not just Jews for the Devil is not a Jew.
MOSES’ FEASTS TO BE KEPT FOREVER
The annual festivals of God that are listed in the Torah are, the First Day of
the Sacred Year, Passover, the Feast of Unleavened Bread, Pentecost, Feast of
Trumpets, Day of Atonement, Feast of Tabernacles and the Last Great Day.
There is also a Night to Be Much Observed in commemoration of the departure of
Israel from Egypt that is often confused with the Passover (Exodus 12:41,42).
The festivals were celebrated in Jerusalem. God chose this location when King
David gained control over the city. If anybody could not get to Jerusalem they
would still have had to keep the festival as best they could. It was not part of
the Law to go to Jerusalem so Jesus changed this permitting the worship to be
one wherever you are (John 4:21).
Sacrifices were offered but the feasts could still be compulsory if sacrifice
had been done for us in the sacrifice of Jesus on the cross but no longer law.
If the law of sacrifice has been kept for us the feasts will have to be
celebrated.
As everybody knows it is normally only Jews who keep the festivals now.
Christians mostly do not bother. They say that they have been made obsolete by
the death of Jesus on the cross.
It is falsely alleged that there is no explicit proof in the New Testament that
these feasts have to be kept by Christians. But suppose that this is true, it
certainly does not say that Jesus has abolished them. Silence is consent here.
You would have to keep the feasts to be on the safe side and if God knew you had
the sense to do that he would not need to be explicit.
The Torah says that the feasts must be kept forever. The Feast of Tabernacles or
Booths is forever (Leviticus 23:40,41). The same was said of the Passover
(Exodus 12:14) in which a lamb was sacrificed and eaten. The feast came around
once a year. God told the Jews that it was for all their generations. Yet the
hypocritical Churches won’t let Christians who have Hebrew blood in them
celebrate the feasts because the sacrifice of Jesus allegedly made sacrifice
unnecessary! The Passover feast required that a Lamb be killed. The Worldwide
Church of God teaches that Jesus has replaced the lamb with bread and wine which
he called his body and blood. There is no biblical warrant for this substitution
theory. The gospel says that Jesus celebrated the Passover (Luke 22). This
proves that the meal is still to be kept by the world in the way Jesus did it in
the evangelist’s opinion. The Christian’s view is that the feast was done away
because Jesus was the sufficient sacrifice and our delivery from sin is more
important to recall than God refusing to kill the firstborn of Israel which is
remembered at the Passover. But Jesus regarded neither of these as a reason for
abolishing the Passover for he celebrated it himself. He added the element of
remembering himself to the Passover. When he said over the Passover bread that
it was his body and that he wanted this done in memory of him it is most likely
that he meant the Passover was to be celebrated as before but with this new
commemoration. If I take Passover bread and do what he did with it, it is most
likely I am telling you to do this with Passover bread at Passover time and not
just any bread at any time. Remember, he was breaking bread and talking in a
Jewish Christian context.
Passover was celebrated once a year.
Christianity regards the Book of Zechariah as scripture and that book says that
the Feast of Booths will be kept in the messianic age with God’s approval (14).
This will happen when God is the only ruler of the world in the future. All the
nations will go up to Jerusalem to keep the feast. This will happen when the
world population will be so low that the whole world will be able to squeeze
into Jerusalem. Zechariah must have assumed that angels will transport them
there for it is too fanciful to say that he had aeroplanes in mind. If Gentiles
and Jews have to keep that feast forever then they have to keep others as well.
Leviticus 16:30 lays it down that the Day of Atonement is to be had forever.
This was to be a day for sacrificing animals and fasting.
The Feast of Pentecost was meant to be kept forever (Leviticus 23:15).
We conclude that as the Jewish feasts had to be kept forever that Christianity
is disobedient. If it is true that the feasts were abolished by the Church for
they did not fit the message of Jesus then clearly Jesus was a fraudulent
Messiah.