WAS JESUS PROPHESIED BY THE OLD TESTAMENT?
The four gospels "are not history remembered but prophecy
historicized" - John Dominic Crossan, (Jesus, 145)
The Christians claim that the main events in the life of Jesus Christ were
predicted by God in the Old Testament before they happened and show that Jesus
was indeed the Son of God to whom we owe absolute obedience for only God knows
the future. Jesus claimed the same thing himself. He went as far as to say that
anybody who disputed that the prophecies were about him was stupid (Luke
24:25-27). Most of the prophecies about Jesus were not prophecies at all.
However, we will focus on the most important and seemingly impressive ones that
he supposedly fulfilled. If the major events of Jesus’ life were not predicted
then there is no point in even thinking about the rest for anybody could fulfil
them assuming they are prophecies at all.
Moses spoke of a prophet who would come after him. Jesus explicitly claimed to
be that prophet. If we read the prophecy of Moses that a prophet would come in
Deuteronomy 18 an interesting picture comes to our minds. There we read that the
people were scared of God appearing in fire or speaking directly to the people
and requested that he use a prophet to give his message instead. God said that
their request was sensible and that he would send the prophet. These people were
speaking for themselves of their fear. The solution was to send them a prophet
like Moses. It was a solution for the generation living then. The prophet was
not Jesus who came centuries later. If Jesus claimed to be God then he was
guilty of leading Israel astray by getting much of it to worship him. Nothing in
the Old Testament says the prophet or Messiah will be God. The prophecy of Moses
explicitly says that the prophet will not teach false doctrine or support any
new God.
Jesus never showed any capability of foretelling the future. He predicted the
destruction of Jerusalem and his own death by crucifixion but these were written
down after the events. This obvious example of cheating doesn't faze the
Christians! The Old Testament is clear that the saviour has to be a prophet or
predictor first and foremost. Jesus couldn’t do forecasts of the future in any
evidently miraculous way therefore he was not the one predicted even if he was
able to match the prophecies in everything else.
It seems to bother nobody that Matthew wrote that Jesus was descended from a man
whose line God cursed and God said that the Messiah could never come from that
man (Jeremiah 22:30).
Isaiah 7:14 was claimed by the Church and the Gospel of Matthew to predict that
Jesus would be born of a virgin. But we have no firsthand testimony that this
virgin birth took place. If you can do without that then prophecies don’t mean
anything. Also, the Hebrew says maiden not virgin. Even if it did say a virgin
would conceive and have a baby like Matthew said, clearly it doesn't say any
more than that she will conceive as a virgin which is possible. She might not be
a virgin by the time she gives birth. Also the context of the prophecy says it
was addressed to King Ahaz not to the generation of Jesus which came about
centuries later.
Psalm 22 seems to predict the crucifixion of Jesus. In the Hebrew original, the
author says he is surrounded by dogs who have pierced his hands and his feet and
he can count all his bones. That is poetry. He has the image of dogs biting at
his hands and his feet as dogs do. Moreover, if the psalmist had meant Jesus he
would not have written as if he wrote about himself. The psalm doesn’t even
mention death and we are expected to consider it to predict the cross of Jesus.
It says that all who see this victim laugh at him and say that he trusted in God
and God isn't helping him. This contradicts commonsense if you take it as true
that the Jews mocked Jesus on the cross. They were not going to say he trusted
in God and then laugh at God not helping him for that is extreme blasphemy and
they wouldn't wish to say that Jesus really trusted God. When Jesus called My
God My God why have you abandoned me they pretended to think that he was calling
on Elijah. It looks as if though the gospels present the Jews as mockers that
the real story may have been that they didn't want people to think he was saying
God abandoned him. This would indicate that they were his friends not his
enemies.
Isaiah 53. All this says is that some good man will suffer for the salvation of
others and as an offering for sin. It doesn't mention a violent death or say
that his tribulations will kill him. There is a tomb among the rich for him but
that doesn't indicate any different. God promises him a reward for pouring out
his soul to death. The passage is so vague it could be referring to a king who
was driven to an early grave by helping and loving the people. If God predicted
the death of Jesus he would have stated clearly the time limit for putting no
limit allows anyone to claim that he is the character in Isaiah 53. It could
even be Padre Pio.
After the resurrection, Peter lied to a gullible crowd about Psalm 16 that said
that God will not abandon his beloved to decay saying it was a prophecy of the
resurrection of Jesus Christ. It only says that someone will be saved from
death. It is too vague to read a resurrection into it and there is no need to.
Remember, stick to the simplest interpretation. Jesus certainly agreed with this
interpretation for he said that his resurrection was forecasted and there was
nothing else in the Old Testament that came close to predicting it.
Daniel 9 is supposed to predict when the Messiah saviour would be on the earth.
In it, 69 weeks are often interpreted as meaning 483 years. The prophecy says to
start counting after a unspecified decree to rebuild the city of Jerusalem.
Christians choose the decree of Artaxerxes in 444 BC for adding on 483 years
assuming that Daniel means years of 360 days gives 33 AD when Jesus was
allegedly crucified. First of all Artaxerxes made no such decree. He only gave
permission to rebuild the city. Secondly, Daniel told us he was reading Jeremiah
and God gave a decree in it so that is the decree he means for otherwise he said
decree and it could be any decree. The decree was made in 587 BC meaning Jesus
came too late to be the Messiah in the prophecy.
Jesus was not prophesied by the Old Testament.
When Critics Ask, Norman Geisler and Thomas Howe, Victor Books, Illinois ,1992