Was JESUS a MYSTICAL FORCE?
The gospels say that a miracle healing man called Jesus Christ lived. They say
he died by crucifixion and three days later he rose again. The tomb he was
placed in was found wide open with the stone that had been across the entrance
moved back and the tomb was mysteriously empty. His body was gone. Certain
witnesses claimed that Jesus appeared to them as a resurrected being.
We know that in the pagan mysteries they had Gods you could pray to. But in
mystical rites you could actually become one person with the God. The ancients
had a different idea of person to what we have. You could be a separate person
from a God and still be the God. You could be the God and appear to yourself in
the rites of the mysteries. We see nothing in the New Testament to indicate that
the early believers in Jesus, thought of Jesus as a person separate from the
Church. Jesus could have been a pantheistic deity that rose again in his Church.
The Church could be his resurrection.
In the Second Epistle of John, chapter 7, in the Bible we read that if anybody
says that Christ has not come in the flesh that such a person is the substitute
Christ, the antichrist. Antichrist means in place of Christ rather than against
Christ. How could each of these teachers be the substitute Christ unless these
people were saying that there was no such man as Christ and that Christ was the
Church?
Today all Christians believe that the holy dead and the evil dead with both rise
again. But in Romans chapter 11, the apostle Paul states that the Jews have
rejected the gospel and if they accept it instead he asks what this will mean.
He answers that it means nothing less then a resurrection from the dead.
Christians say he means a good resurrection from the dead. If they turn to Jesus
they will rise again in glory and as saints. But he doesn't say anything about
such a resurrection here. He just says resurrection. He was saying that those
who die in evil or unbelief will not be resurrected from the dead. Some scholars
are tempted at this point to argue that he did believe good and bad would rise
again from the dead but that he was talking about another resurrection here.
They say he meant the resurrection from dead sinner to living disciple of Jesus
that takes place when God cleanses one from all sin. Then why didn't he say that
and be clear? Is it possible that the resurrection he means is Jesus rising from
the dead not by himself but in his Church like one of the pantheistic style
deities of mystical paganism?
In Galatians 3:8 and 3:16 Paul says that the promise God made to Abraham's seed
in the Book of Genesis refers to a single seed which is Christ. The Genesis text
has seeds. Paul actually says it does not say seeds but seed. This was a blatant
lie or is there another possibility? The Church members could be described as
seeds when looked at from one perspective. When looked at from another, they are
one seed Jesus Christ. Paul reasons in 1 Corinthians 15 that since Jesus has
risen all people will rise again. His thinking is that what is true of the
representative is true of those represented at least in this case. That could
only be if the Church somehow is Jesus. Only then can what is true of one be
true of the other.
Paul says that he has been sent to the pagans as their apostle and the purpose
of this is so that they will convert to Jesus and that the Jewish people might
get jealous of their faith and holiness and join the Jesus faith themselves
(Romans 11). There was much holiness among the Jews. The Jews didn't like the
Christian faith for it wasn't nationalistic and didn't care much for Israel's
liberation from Rome. Everybody admits that Christian Jews still kept the Law
and Paul encouraged this. What would Jews over the world be envious of a few
pagan believers in Rome for? The believers were hardly on reality television
either. Why didn't Jesus do what Paul did? Does it make sense that a saviour
would spend all his ministry among scoffers when he could get a better reception
from the pagans?
If the gospels are true about Jesus, there is absolutely no way the Jews would
have been envious for Jesus and the Jews saw eye to eye on very little and he
vomited on their Jewish traditions. The gospels are full of Jesus' attempts to
have a ministry independent of theirs and his battles with the Jewish religion.
The gospels say he was so hated that the Jews even went to the detested Pilate
and urged him to crucify him though crucifixion was such an abomination in the
Jewish religion and desecrated the land which was blessed by God.
Paul wrote, “Now I rejoice in the midst of my sufferings on your behalf. And in
my own person I am making up whatever is still lacking and remains to be
completed of Christ’s afflictions, for the sake of His body which is the Church.
In it I became a minister in accordance with the divine stewardship which was
entrusted to me for you, to make the Word of God fully known. The mystery of
which was hidden for ages and generations [from angels and men], but is now
revealed to His holy people. To whom God was pleased to make known how great for
the Gentiles are the riches of the glory of this mystery, which is Christ within
and among you, the Hope of [realizing the] glory” (Colossians 1:24-27).
The mystery then is the presence of Jesus in his Church. In the mystery
religions, the main mystery was how the God could be one with his people. The
mystery is being revealed to his holy people, this means they experience the
Christ within. The word mystery is used with the secondary but no less
significant meaning of secret. God wanted to keep it secret because it was
something very extraordinary and shocking. The only thing shocking about this
when the Bible has never had a problem with angels being present and even
appearing and invisibly protecting God’s people could be that Jesus is the
Church. What else could it be?
Each member of the Church is the same person though separate in some respects as
Jesus Christ. We find this to be taught in 1 Corinthians 6:15-20). There Paul
tells the believers of Corinth that their bodies are parts of Christ’s body so
it makes sense not to unite a part of Christ with a prostitute. He wrote that he
who unites with Christ becomes one spirit with him. All this unmistakably
literal. If you are only symbolically part of the body of Jesus Christ then it
would not follow that you shouldn’t become one with a prostitute.
In 1 Corinthians 12:12-31 we read that the believers are members of the body of
Christ. God has arranged it so that there are different parts which all need
each other to be a body. For example, the ear should not assume that because it
is not an eye it belongs less to the body. That is why the Church must all
suffer if one member suffers and must rejoice if one member is honoured. The
members are all equally valuable and even the weak ones are indispensable.
Romans 12:4,5 says that believers are all members of one body in Christ and
individually members of one another. So they are not only members of Christ but
of one another. The body belongs to Paul, Peter, and whoever else was a follower
of Jesus in those days as much as it does Jesus. This shows clearly that the
Church and Jesus are one and the same person. Jesus rose from the dead in his
Church not as man.
The fact that God could make a body that was just a head and self-sufficient
shows the weakness in Paul’s logic about the body. The angels didn’t have bodies
at all and yet Jesus was thought to be in them and they were part of the Church
too. Why was Paul so silly then when he must have seen through it? The reason
was that the Church was the resurrection body of Jesus Christ. To get people to
believe his lie about the resurrection he had to ignore the foolishness of his
doctrine of the body.
Is the body just a metaphor for the Church being intimately united in Christ?
No. It could be literal for pagan theologies had literal parallels. He was
writing to ex-pagans who were pining for their paganism back so he would not
have talked so literally to them unless he meant to be literal. In addition, he
definitely stated that he did not mean it as a metaphor.
Not surprisingly Paul claims to be Jesus Christ. He would not have done this had
he not meant it for otherwise it would have been grave disrespect. He said he
was crucified when Jesus was and that he no longer lived but Jesus lived in his
place (Galatians 2:20). He told his followers to follow him the way he follows
Jesus (1 Corinthians 11:1). Reverence would require him to say that they should
follow Jesus as he does.
When the resurrection of Jesus was in his Church it follows that the visions of
the risen Jesus were parables for getting that message across. Possibly if you
could have a perception like a daydream that Jesus was appearing to you that was
a valid experience as long as it changed your life and confirmed that the Church
was Jesus Christ. Where does the crucifixion come into this? Jesus was crucified
but not by nails but by sins. He died destroyed our evil natures and rose again
in us to give us new natures.
The Greeks saw the body as an island that interacts with other islands. It is
John and not Pete. Paul would have accepted the traditional Hebrew view that a
body is not like this but is a communion with other people. In other words, you
are your family (page 89, The First Easter). This is silly I know but that is
how they thought and Buddhists often think in the same way (page 97, The First
Easter). Paul’s doctrine of the Church members being one body and part of the
body of Christ proves he thought like them for the community being the body of
Jesus Christ is not a metaphor but a fact according to the theology of Paul
(page 66, The First Easter). In 2 Corinthians 4:10 we are told that we carry the
death of Jesus in our bodies so that the life of Jesus may be seen. This text
tells the Church to show the resurrection by being the resurrected Saviour.
Paul said that the body is a member of Jesus Christ a part of his body so that
was why it would be so terrible for a Christian to have sex with a prostitute (1
Corinthians 6:14-20). He did mean all this literally. He went as far as to write
that the body is not made for fornication but for the Lord and the Lord for the
body (v 13). He then went on to say that just as God raised the Lord from the
dead so he will raise us up too. So the Lord is Jesus. From the context he meant
that the reason the Lord Jesus exists is for the body so that it can be raised
from the dead. If Jesus died so that we could be forgiven and be given the grace
to rise from the dead that does not mean that the body is for him. It would if
he somehow becomes us. In that context, saying our bodies are for him and he is
for the body makes sense.
Romans 12:5 says we are parts of Jesus’ body so we belong to one another. If
Paul just meant that we are one family then why did he say body? The unity in a
body is stronger than unity even in a family. Paul was too serious to exaggerate
by saying body when he should have said family. It is not surprising that he is
taken to be saying that the Church is the resurrection body of Jesus and that
Jesus would cease to exist anymore without it (page 69, The First Easter). I
would correct this to say that it would mean Jesus lost his body and would cease
to be a resurrected person. He might be a spirit. If the Church is the risen
Jesus then it follows that there was no need for visions or a missing tomb at
all. All was necessary was a sense of communication with the Holy Spirit that
Jesus was alive and physically the Church. When Jesus appeared it would then not
have been as a vision but in a way that can only be described as a vision for it
was the mystical experience that the Church was the risen Jesus through which he
speaks and works and lives. Intellectually and spiritually it was a vision
though there might never have been physical appearances of Jesus. “ Please read
the Christian book, The First Easter, What Really Happened? HJ Richards,
Collins/Fount Glasgow, 1980.
If the resurrection is the appearance of the Church then how can Paul say that
if Christ has not risen then the dead are lost? Jesus being dead would not mean
the dead are necessarily lost. It would if God can only save those who become
Jesus and there is nothing to become. To say Jesus didn’t rise is to say the
dead are lost because Jesus rising means being saved by becoming Jesus so that
God is pleased with them.
So Jesus is the Church. The Church can break this union for example by sleeping
with prostitutes so Jesus can lose parts but regain his completion by calling
new members. What breaks away is not part of the body anymore. So this theology
does not accept the criticism that since the Church sins the Church cannot be
identified with Christ. Anyway, we are supposed to be righteous in Christ in the
sight of God which means that God does not see our sins for Jesus has dealt with
them.
The ancient doctrine of the Church being the only begotten Son of God has been
revived in more recent times by the American based Church of the Living Word.
Conclusion
The possibility that Jesus for Paul was a pantheistic godling that was really
the Church is an intriguing one. There is more evidence that Paul believed
Christ and the Church were one and the same thing. He spoke very literally about
this subject and without qualification. The Catholic Church proclaims the bread
and wine of communion to be Jesus on less evidence and without any Bible
statement that is as frank and direct as those that say Jesus is the Church and
the Church is Jesus.
A Concise History of the Catholic Church, Thomas Bokenkotter, Image Books, New
York, 1979
Alleged Discrepancies of the Bible, John W Haley, Whitaker House, Pennsylvania,
undated
A Separate God, The Christian Origins of Gnosticism, Sophie Petrement, Harper,
San Francisco, 1984
Asking them Questions, Various, Oxford University Press, London, 1936
Belief and Make-Believe, GA Wells, Open Court, La Salle, Illinois, 1991
Concise Guide to Today’s Religions, Josh McDowell and Don Stewart, Scripture
Press, Bucks, 1983
Conspiracies and the Cross, Timothy Paul Jones, Front Line, A Strang Company,
Florida, 2008
Did Jesus Exist? GA Wells, Pemberton, London, 1988
Did Jesus Exist? John Redford, Catholic Truth Society, London, 1986
Documents of the Christian Church, edited by Henry Bettenson, Oxford University
Press, Oxford, 1979
Early Christian Writings, Maxwell Staniforth Editor, Penguin, London, 1988
Encyclopaedia of Heresies and Heretics, Leonard George, Robson Books, London,
1995
Encyclopaedia of Unbelief, Volume 1, Ed Gordon Stein, (Ed) Prometheus Books, New
York, 1985
Evidence that Demands a Verdict, Vol 1, Josh McDowell, Alpha, Scripture Press
Foundation, Bucks, 1995
Handbook to the Controversy With Rome, Volume 1, Karl Von Hase, The Religious
Tract Society, London, 1906
He Walked Among Us, Josh McDowell and Bill Wilson, Alpha Cumbria, 2000
In Defence of the Faith, Dave Hunt, Harvest House, Eugene, Oregon, 1996
Introduction to the New Testament, Roderick A F MacKenzie, SJ, Liturgical Press,
Minnesota, 1965
Jesus, AN Wilson, Flamingo, London, 1993
Jesus and the Goddess, The Secret Teachings of the Original Christians, Timothy
Freke and Peter Gandy, Thorsons, London, 2001
Jesus – God the Son or Son of God? Fred Pearce Christadelphian Publishing
Office, Birmingham, undated
Jesus – One Hundred Years Before Christ, Professor Alvar Ellegard Century,
London, 1999
Jesus and the Four Gospels, John Drane, Lion, Herts, 1984
Jesus Hypotheses, V Messori, St Paul Publications, Slough, 1977
Jesus Lived in India by Holger Kersten, Element, Dorset, 1994
Jesus, Qumran and the Vatican, Otto Betz and Rainer Riesner, SCM Press Ltd,
London, 1994
Jesus the Evidence, Ian Wilson, Pan, London, 1985
Jesus the Magician, Morton Smith, Harper & Row, San Francisco, 1978
Jesus under Fire, Edited by Michael F Wilkins and JP Moreland, Zondervan
Publishing House, Michigan, 1995
Lectures and Replies, Thomas Carr, Archbishop of Melbourne, Melbourne, 1907
Let’s Weigh the Evidence, Barry Burton, Chick Publications, Chino, CA, 1983
Miracles in Dispute, Ernst and Marie-Luise Keller, SCM Press Ltd, London, 1969
Nag Hammadi Library, Ed James M Robinson HarperCollins New York 1990
On the True Doctrine, Celsus, Translated by R Joseph Hoffmann, Oxford University
Press, Oxford 1987
Putting Away Childish Things, Uta Ranke-Heinemann, HarperCollins, San Francisco,
1994
Runaway World, Michael Green, IVP, London, 1974
St Paul versus St Peter, A Tale of Two Missions, Michael Goulder, Westminster
John Knox Press, Louisville, Kentucky, 1994
St Peter and Rome, JBS, Irish Church Missions, Dublin, undated
Saint Saul, Donald Harman Akenson, Oxford University Press, New York, 2000
The Bible Fact or Fantasy, John Drane, Lion, Oxford, 1989
The Bible Unearthed, Israel Finkelstein and Neil Asher Silberman, Touchstone
Books, New York, 2002.
The Call to Heresy, Robert Van Weyer, Lamp Books, London, 1989
The Case For Christ, Lee Strobel, HarperCollins and Zondervan, Michigan, 1998
The Case for Jesus the Messiah, John Ankerberg Harvest House, Eugene, Oregon,
1989
The Early Church, Henry Chadwick, Pelican, Middlesex, 1967
The Encyclopedia of Heresies and Heretics, Leonard George, Robson Books, London,
1995
The First Christian, Karen Armstrong, Pan, London, 1983
The Gnostic Gospels, Elaine Pagels, Penguin, London, 1990
The Gnostic Paul, Elaine Pagels, Fortress Press, Philadelphia, 1975
The History of Christianity, Lion, Herts 1982
The History of the Church, Eusebius, Penguin, London, 1989
The House of the Messiah, Ahmed Osman, Grafton, London, 1993
The Jesus Event and Our Response, Martin R Tripole SJ, Alba House, New York,
1980
The Jesus Hoax, Phyllis Graham, Leslie Frewin, London, 1974
The Jesus Inquest, Charles Foster, Monarch Books, Oxford, 2006
The Jesus Mysteries, Timothy Freke and Peter Gandy, Thorsons, London, 1999
The MythMaker, St Paul and the Invention of Christianity, Hyam Maccoby,
Weidenfeld and Nicholson, London, 1986
The Pagan Christ, Tom Harpur, Thomas Allen Publishers, Toronto, 2004
The Reconstruction of Belief, Charles Gore DD, John Murray, London, 1930
The Rise and Fall of Jesus, Steuart Campbell, Explicit Books, Edinburgh, 1996
The Search for the Twelve Apostles, William Steuart McBirnie, Tyndale House,
1997
The Secret Gospel Morton Smith Aquarian Press, Harper & Row, San Francisco, 1985
The Truth of Christianity, WH Turton, Wells Gardner, Darton & Co Ltd, London,
1905
The Unauthorised Version, Robin Lane Fox, Penguin, Middlesex, 1992
The Virginal Conception and Bodily Resurrection of Jesus, Raymond E Brown,
Paulist Press, New York, 1973
Theodore Parker’s Discourses, Theodore Parker, Longmans, Green, Reader and Dyer,
London, 1876
Theological Dictionary of the New Testament. Kittel Gerhard and Friedrich
Gerhard, Eerdman’s Publishing Co, Grand Rapids, MI, 1976
Those Incredible Christians, Hugh Schonfield, Hutchinson, London, 1968
Who Was Jesus? A Conspiracy in Jerusalem, by Kamal Salabi, I.B. Taurus and Co
Ltd., London, 1992
Who Was Jesus? NT Wright, SPCK, London, 1993
Why I Believe Jesus Lived, C G Colly Caldwell, Guardian of Truth, Kentucky