Jesus and Gratitude and how he didn't know what he was talking about
Gratitude only makes sense if a being can harm you but does not. Gratitude only
makes sense if a being can hate you but does not. Gratitude towards God does not
fit the idea of him being incapable of evil.
Jesus assures his hearers in the sermon on the mount that the plants of the
field are arrayed better than Solomon and that no bird drops dead without
Heavenly Father knowing about it. He paints a rosy picture about the
pointlessness of worry. But in those brutal times worry was sane and inevitable.
He was clearly trying to give the people a placebo and put a rosy filter over
their perception of reality. Realistically, humans who have a good life are a
tiny minority when you consider how many people have lived in horror and
suffered and got maimed and died young. The picture gets terrible when you
include animal suffering. He endorsed gratitude but there is something warped
about one person thanking the king for giving him bread when he knows thousands
are going without though his majesty can feed them too. There is no real
thanking where there is no possibility of thinking, "I thank you for you could
do wrong and often do terrible things to others and for that I do not thank you
but condemn you." Thanking and the possibility of not thanking but attacking the
giver go together. Thanking means recognising the person could hurt or neglect
you but does not. It is not about you and your thanking is making it about you.
Thank him for your smug arrogance? Go ahead!