THE EXTREMIST: JESUS SAID WE MUST LOVE GOD ALONE
For Christians Jesus is God's infallible unerring son.
Jesus when he was asked by a Jewish scholar, a scribe, what the greatest
commandment of morality was replied as follows.
“The first of all the commandments is, Hear, O Israel; the Lord our God is one
Lord: And thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy
soul, and with all thy mind, and with all thy strength: this is the first
commandment. And the second is like, namely this, Thou shalt love thy neighbour
as thyself. There is none other commandment greater than these” (Mark 12:29-31,
King James Bible).
Jesus said that we are to love God with all our heart, soul, mind and strength
(which is commanded by the depraved prophet Moses in Deuteronomy 6). That is,
God is to be loved wholly. We do not love him most and give the rest of our love
to others. We must love him alone and love others for his sake.
An early source for passing on Jesus' teaching reminds us that it can be reworded, "Do things for others but make sure it is only and really for God!" Here it is: Ephesians 6:7-9
7 Serve wholeheartedly, as if you were serving the Lord, not people,
8 because you know that the Lord will reward each one for
whatever good they do, whether they are slave or free.
9 And masters, treat your slaves in the same way. Do not threaten them, since
you know that he who is both their Master and yours is in heaven, and there is
no favoritism with him.
New International Version (NIV).
This is the strongest paraphrase and statement of the doctrine imaginable for it is about how slaves should treat their Master the exact same as if they were God.
Jesus is saying we must love God not with some of our
energy, most of our energy but ALL our energy. In other words, everything we do
must be solely motivated by what pleases God. It is all about pleasing him. When
you help the sick, it is not done to help the sick but to honour God. It is done
for God.
God is to be loved totally and ultimately and absolutely for he is the only
being that matters and everything comes from him and he is infinite love unlike
his creatures. So love is all sacrifice. Also, love is action. You cannot know
if you are loving enough to undergo torture forever to spare somebody else and
when God wants you to be other-centred not self-centred he wants you to embrace
that destiny if possible. You have to be willing to embrace it if possible. And
if it is not possible the nearest you can get to it is by doing nothing for
yourself and avoiding happiness in order that you may serve God in others. This
is another way that the love of God cannot be exactly pleasant. Also, we do not
like absolute morality. Absolute morality means something is bad no matter how
much good will result from it. God is a concept that creates more absolute rules
than we would have if we were atheists. The devotion asked for God is not
justified by the evidence - the evidence for God is not good enough. God is an
action word not a noun meaning that it gives you a demanding and fearsome
"morality". Religion is to blame for sin for it does not have a high enough
standard and ends up wallowing in hypocrisy. It fails to help people keep God's
terrible demands. It cherry-picks from his rules.
Jesus said that we must love our neighbour as ourselves. If we serve the needs
of our neighbour for the sake of God and to please him then just as when you do
good for others to benefit yourselves it is not loving them at all so it is when
you do it for the Lord God. It is deceiving them, it is manipulating them.
Jesus embraced little children saying, "Whosoever shall receive one of such
children in my name, receiveth me: and whosoever shall receive me, receiveth not
me, but him that sent me" (Mark 9:37). He is showing that he means welcoming a
person in the loose sense. Strictly speaking it is only God that is to be
welcomed. That is how the seeming contradiction between loving God alone and
loving neighbour is reconciled. He is clear that he does not mean, "Whoever
receives a child does not just receive the child but receives me too".
"Receiveth not me", makes that plain.
But how do we explain Jesus telling us that we must love our neighbour? Is there
a contradiction? No. Love your neighbour may mean treat your neighbour as God
wills which is the good way as God sees it for the sake of God. Jesus made it
clear that he did not mean love in the sense of valuing the person in themselves
and for themselves when he said the commandment to love only God was the
principal one and he said the command about loving neighbour was a secondary one
that was like it meaning that it was just a way of carrying out and practicing
the first. He observed that the first great commandment is the key to the
interpretation of the second great commandment. Only God is to be valued in and
for himself when he said God alone matters for the believer. To value others
just because God values them is to value God not them. They are not really
valued for they are not valued for themselves.
When the Bible command to love God with all our hearts and powers is the prime
commandment it follows that the trendy idea that you have to love yourself first
before you can love God or anybody else is being rejected. The trend is telling
you to love God - if you so choose - because you love yourself. To love God and
your neighbour because you love yourself means that you only love yourself in
the strict sense of the word. The command is that we love God because we do not
love ourselves except in the sense that we do with ourselves what God wants us
to do and God is right and good. It will be objected that you can hardly love
God if you offer yourself to him and think you are worthless for that is meaning
to offer him something worthless. But that is something we have learned in
recent centuries and we cannot pretend the Bible is as wise as us. However, the
biblical answer would be, “Grace is the power of God with which God helps us to
do what we cannot do ourselves. God can make us love him despite our hatred for
ourselves by a miracle for grace is a miracle”. The Bible teaches that sin is a
form of self-hatred and we are all sinners so any good we do or improvement we
make is an unnatural miracle for nature decrees that we sin all the time.
Love of neighbour, in the Christian view, means making a person good in the eyes
of God but not being warm to or valuing that person. It would be evil to put
being nice and charming to another person before urging them to do heroic good.
So, if selflessness is love then love means making others selfless, making them
sacrifice and die daily for God. So love of neighbour is not feeding the hungry
or clothing the naked for their own sake who are dying of cold or anything like
that. Such acts are only a means of luring people into the trap. It is
converting them to slavery to God. We can’t say that we have to look after their
needs so that they might be more open to the need for serving God without
interest in anything other than his will for that is like helping people to sin
in order to put them off sin.
We know that if God exists then he is the perfect or the most perfect being and
so other people must be loved only for his sake while all our love is given to
him. But it is a disgrace to do this though Christianity and Jesus accept and
command it.
We are aware that that is not loving your neighbour at
all. If we repress our good feelings towards others what kind of existence will
we have? We need to be cared about and appreciated, not used to score points
with a thing that may not even exist!
Atheism is not only the only true philosophy but the best. Any advantage theism
has can still be enjoyed in Atheism. Let us go and proclaim Atheism to every
creature because we don’t truly come as near to caring about others as we can if
we don’t.
For Christians, Jesus Christ is the infallible voice of God and the Son of God.
If his major doctrine is untrue then we must dismiss him as yet another
religious fraud. The doctrine even if true is off-putting and would destroy
Christianity if it had the honesty to promote it as it thinks it should.
WHAT IF GOD REALLY ALONE DOES MATTER?
When God is not in your life much or at all evil will
rush in and be invited in to fill the void. If that idea is wrong then there is
no point in God being important or of supreme importance. Jesus’ core teaching
that loving God is absolute central is false. God is not a God but just as
important as Zeus if he is not that which can give you the ultimate and supreme
mutual relationship. These are all reasons why failing in the total love
of God is the biggest and most unimaginable sin. And its one we do all the
time!
A PRAYER
In the Saint Martin de Porres Prayer Book, page 98, we find a Roman Catholic
prayer to God the Father. "O Holy Lord, Father Almighty, everlasting God, for
the sake of Your bounty and that of Your Son, who for me endured suffering and
death: for the sake of the most excellent holiness of His Mother and the merits
of all the Saints, grant unto me a sinner, unworthy of all Your blessings, that
I may love You only, may ever thirst for Your love, may have continually in my
heart the benefits of Your passion, may acknowledge my own wretchedness and may
desire to be trampled upon and be despised by all men; let nothing grieve me
save guilt. Amen."
The prayer teaches the doctrine properly. The person asks God for the power to
love God alone. The person wishes to suffer ultimate degradation to prove this
love. The person wishes to suffer for the love of God by thirsting for it. All
this is asked not for the person's sake but God's. The prayer attacks modern
psychology which urges one to love oneself unconditionally.
CONCLUSION
Jesus said that we must love God with all our heart - the heart being the symbol
of the affections and emotions. We must be passionately and insanely in love
with God. He means that if God wants us to suffer to the extreme for love we
must do it. And if we find an opportunity to make that possible we must take it.
We must be more concerned about finding the opportunity than about anything
else. This tells us that such a sacrifice is to be praised and not only praised
but encouraged! Loving God the way the God belief suggests you should implies
that you are suffering from some addiction. You turn away from loving others and
yourself to love a concept. What you don’t see is put before the people you do
see. To serve others while valuing God and not them is to manipulate and fool
and trick them.
BOOKS CONSULTED
A CATECHISM OF CHRISTIAN DOCTRINE, CTS, London, 1985
A HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHY, VOL 6, PART II, KANT, Frederick Copleston SJ,
Doubleday/Image, New York 1964
AQUINAS, FC Copleston, Penguin Books, London, 1991
BEYOND GOOD AND EVIL, Friedrich Nietzsche, Penguin, London, 1990
BOOK OF COMMON PRAYER, Association for the Promotion of Christian Knowledge,
Dublin, 1960
CATECHISM OF THE CATHOLIC CHURCH, Veritas, London, 1995
CHARITY, MEDITATIONS FOR A MONTH, Richard F Clarke SJ, Catholic Truth Society,
London, 1973
CHRISTIANITY FOR THE TOUGH-MINDED, Edited by John Warwick Montgomery, Bethany
Fellowship, Minnesota, 1973
CRISIS OF MORAL AUTHORITY, Don Cupitt, SCM Press, London, 1995
EVIDENCE THAT DEMANDS A VERDICT, VOL 1, Josh McDowell, Alpha, Scripture Press
Foundation, Bucks, 1995
ECUMENICAL JIHAD, Peter Kreeft, Ignatius Press, San Francisco, 1996
GOD IS NOT GREAT, THE CASE AGAINST RELIGION, Christopher Hitchens, Atlantic
Books, London, 2007
THE GREAT MEANS OF SALVATION AND OF PERFECTION, St Alphonsus De Ligouri,
Redemptorist Fathers, Brooklyn, 1988
HANDBOOK OF CHRISTIAN APOLOGETICS, Peter Kreeft and Ronald Tacelli, Monarch,
East Sussex, 1995
HONEST TO GOD, John AT Robinson, SCM, London, 1963
HOW DOES GOD LOVE ME? Radio Bible Class, Grand Rapids, Michigan, 1986
IN DEFENCE OF THE FAITH, Dave Hunt, Harvest House, Eugene, Oregon, 1996
MADAME GUYON, MARTYR OF THE HOLY SPIRIT, Phyllis Thompson, Hodder & Stoughton,
London, 1986
MORAL PHILOSOPHY, Joseph Rickaby SJ, Stonyhurst Philosophy Series, Longmans
Green and Co, London, 1912
OXFORD DICTIONARY OF PHILOSOPHY, Simon Blackburn, Oxford University Press,
Oxford, 1996
PRACTICAL ETHICS, Peter Singer, Cambridge University Press, England, 1994
PSYCHOLOGY, George A Miller, Penguin, London, 1991
RADIO REPLIES, 1, Frs Rumble & Carty, Radio Replies Press, St Paul, Minnesota,
1938
RADIO REPLIES, 2, Frs Rumble & Carty, Radio Replies Press, St Paul, Minnesota,
1940
RADIO REPLIES, 3, Frs Rumble & Carty, Radio Replies Press, St Paul, Minnesota,
1942
REASON AND BELIEF, Brand Blanschard, George Allen and Unwin Ltd, 1974
REASONS FOR HOPE, Ed Jeffrey A Mirus, Christendom College Press, Virginia, 1982
THE ATONEMENT: MYSTERY OF RECONCILIATION, Kevin McNamara, Archbishop of Dublin,
Veritas, Dublin, 1987
SINNERS IN THE HANDS OF AN ANGRY GOD, Jonathan Edwards, Sword of the Lord,
Murfreesboro, Tennessee, undated
THE BIBLE TELLS US SO, R B Kuiper, The Banner of Truth Trust, Edinburgh, 1978
THE BRIEF OF ST ANTHONY OF PADUA (Vol 44, No 4)
THE GOOD, THE BAD & THE MORAL DILEMMA, G R Evans, Lion Books, Oxford, 2007
THE GREAT MEANS OF SALVATION AND OF PERFECTION, St Alphonsus De Ligouri,
Redemptorist Fathers, Brooklyn, 1988
THE IMITATION OF CHRIST, Thomas A Kempis, Translated by Ronald Knox and Michael
Oakley, Universe, Burns & Oates, London, 1963
THE LIFE OF ALL LIVING, Fulton J Sheen, Image Books, New York, 1979
THE NEW WALK, Captain Reginald Wallis, The Christian Press, Pembridge Villas,
England, undated
THE PRACTICE OF THE PRESENCE OF GOD, Brother Lawrence, Hodder & Stoughton,
London, 1981
THE PROBLEM OF PAIN, CS Lewis, Fontana, London, 1972
THE PUZZLE OF GOD, Peter Vardy, Collins, London, 1990
THE SATANIC BIBLE, Anton Szandor LaVey, Avon Books, New York, 1969
THE SPIRITUAL GUIDE, Michael Molinos, Christian Books, Gardiner Maine, 1982
THE STUDENT’S CATHOLIC DOCTRINE, Rev Charles Hart BA, Burns & Oates, London,
1961
UNBLIND FAITH, Michael J Langford, SCM, London, 1982