Religion Motivated Jack the Ripper to Kill
The Question
In 1888, the most infamous murders of all time took place in London’s East End.
Five prostitutes, destitute women who knew of no other way to survive, were
slaughtered and mutilated by a supposedly unknown killer who bears the nickname
Jack the Ripper. If we don't know for sure who the killer was do we know that
his religious faith drove him to kill those women?
Preface
There can be no doubt that the first known serial killer of modern times, Jack
the Ripper, was driven by religion to commit his crimes. As we will see, the
Ripper was a Jew who killed his five victims as human sacrifices to his God. It
is important that religion should not be given the prestige it has so that it
will never have such a dangerous influence ever again.
We may not have incontrovertible proof pertaining to the identity of the Ripper.
After all he was never caught in the act. Due to press and police mishandling of
the case, we may have to do without it. And though desirable it isn’t absolutely
necessary. But who the Ripper was is a matter of enormous interest and
determined speculation to this day. And the experts disagree sharply in trying
to put a name on the monster that terrorised London in those dark days. But we
do have proof that religion murdered those five women. In sifting out the truth
and the possible identity of the Ripper it is important that we try to stick
with what evidence we have got. Once we start getting sceptical without proper
reason about anything witnesses say we can make the evidence mean anything.
However if a report or testimony is clearly tainted by errors there is nothing
wrong with trying to weed out the errors.
What is aimed for in this study, is finding the facts about the Ripper. None of
its conclusions or assertions are intended to justify the anti-Semitic fondness
for spreading rumour and slander on the Jews that they like to commit ritual
murder for instance. Though much religion is harmful that is not to say that its
members are dangerous and should be hated. Most Jews today are true
humanitarians and a Jew can do wrong like an atheist or anybody else can. One
cannot stigmatise a whole section of society because of the crimes of a few.
Judaism of the three world religions, Christianity, Islam and Judaism, is the
one that has caused the least religious wars and the least mental illnesses and
its misogynistic tendencies are weak in comparison to its sister faiths. Above
all Judaism has learned more from humanitarian theological liberalism than any
other faith and many of the Jews ignore the nastier commandments of God in the
Old Testament. This must be remembered and the Jewish people must be applauded
for that.
Someone is better positioned than us to see Ripper's faith
Dr Lyttleton Stewart Forbes Winslow spent “day after day and night after
night-in the Whitechapel slums” looking for clues about the Ripper. He decided
that the Ripper had to be “a homicidal lunatic goaded on to his dreadful work by
a sense of duty” and “possibly imagined that he received his commands from God.
After each murder had been carried out and the lust for blood appeased, the
lunatic changed at once from a homicidal religious maniac into a quiet man with
a perfect knowledge of what he was doing.” He added that he felt the killer was
a young well-off man.
Dr Bond who saw the injuries inflicted on some of the Ripper victims said that
the killer’s “homicidal impulse may have developed from a revengeful or brooding
condition of the mind, or that Religious Mania may have been the original
disease, but I do not think either hypothesis is likely”. It is interesting
though that he saw things that made it look like a religious nutter was at work.
Sir Robert Anderson who was head of the Criminal Investigation Division of the
London Metropolitan Police in 1888 wrote, "When the individual whom we suspected
was caged in an asylum, the only person who had ever had a good view of the
murderer at once identified him, but when he learned that the suspect was a
fellow-Jew he declined to swear to him." Because of religion, justice couldn’t
be done for the five murdered women. Religion not only took their lives but it
sought to protect the murderer.
Those who knew more about the murders than we ever will stated that the Ripper
was possibly - and a strong possibly - a Jew. Swanson and Anderson the
detectives said it was certain he was a Jew. In 1910, Anderson wrote concerning
the Ripper, “In saying that he was a Polish Jew I am merely stating a definitely
ascertained fact. And my words are meant to specify race, not religion. For it
would outrage all religious sentiment to talk of the religion of a loathsome
creature whose utterly unmentionable vices reduced him to a lower level than
that of the brute."
Study that declaration. He writes that he cannot say the Ripper had a religion
though he calls him a Jew. He says he means to specify the race of the Ripper
not his religion as if he doesn’t want to insult the Jewish religion by saying
the Ripper was a Jew. Now why would it be an insult to Jews to say the Ripper
was a Jew and not an insult to Polish people to say the Ripper was Polish? He
doesn’t want to speak of the Ripper as religious because the Ripper had depraved
religious beliefs. It would be stupid to think the Ripper had no religious
beliefs. Anderson felt that to say that a Jewish fanatic who lived as if
brutally killing prostitutes were a Jewish religious duty was a Jew is to insult
the Jewish faith. That is where he was coming from. He was not necessarily
hinting that the Ripper suffered from a religious mania. The killer could have
been a religious extremist and the way Anderson speaks of him shows that the
killer was considered evil rather than insane.
No Ripper candidate shows signs of religious extremism. The only thing we have
is Kosminski worrying about breaking the Jewish sabbath. It is something to go
on.
Why was no money found on the victims who certainly would have got paid in
advance? However it is felt that the Ripper robbed Annie Chapman and there was a
leather apron in the yard where she was found. The Ripper if he did not need to
rob her might have been aware that John Pizer, Leather Apron, was accused of the
murders so far. Pizer was a Jew who loved to batter prostitutes into giving him
their money. Did the Ripper rob Annie to create a false trail? If so, did the
Ripper know John Pizer?
Some surmise that murders however were not about money. The effort the Ripper
went and the risk he put himself in by taking time to take any money from them
speaks of somebody who did not want others to think he went with prostitutes.
The murders gave a message: not about money, not about sex, nothing personal - I
just have to be God's instrument against prostitutes.
But simple robbery is a more sensible idea. The victims had other clients so did
he take their money? It would be strange to take such immoral earnings away with
him if he was that virtuous!
It is thought the killer got the women to empty their pockets before he slew
them. That would explain why no blood was found on the objects lying around or
found inside the pockets. The idea that he held them at knifepoint and
robbed them is improbable. It was easy to attack when they were trying to
poke around in their own pockets when being threatened with a knife.
The Ripper wrote a message blaming the Jews in chalk on a wall. It is too much
of a coincidence that this message was written where the Ripper discarded a tiny
piece of apron that he did not really need. It was made to appear that he needed
it to wipe his hands and knife but that is hard to believe! The Ripper probably
did not clean up but just put a coat over the mess on his clothes - not that
there would have been a huge mess. The message certainly suggests the Ripper was
being protected by Jews.
Remember too that even when there were only two recognised victims Nichols and
Chapman the people were convinced that Jew John Pizer was the killer. Even
worse, the rumour had started with the killing of Nichols! When Polly Nichols
died the people had already pointed the finger at a Jew specifically this John
Pizer. The rumour could have started through people seeing a Jew who seemed to
be responsible and feeling they had not enough to go to the police with.
The man seen with some of the women just before they died had a Jewish
appearance. The man seen with Annie Chapman was described as a foreigner meaning
a Jew by Mrs Long. Mrs Long must have been talking to the gossips and the man
must have looked as Jewish as John Pizer!! The rumour would not have been fueled
otherwise.
Possible Ripper witness Israel Schwartz saw a man in the presence of Elizabeth
Stride who was called Lipski by a man attacking her. The attacker was not the
killer and she was found dead later. The name Lipski was a form of abuse against
Jewish males for Lipski had been a murderer. Lipski by the way had been a Polish
Jew. So a Polish Jew could be called a Polish Jew in insult. There was a Polish
Jew there!
The Ripper should have been caught so the Ripper had to have been protected by
his family and people. Jews were against handing their own up to Gentile
justice.
The best suspects are Jews. Especially Aaron Kosminski and David Cohen.
The Ripper's pious hatred of female sexuality
Religious faith is always chiefly characterised by a desire to control and maybe
mock sexuality. Sexual sins get terrible penalties. Jesus wants those who commit
them damned forever in Hell while Moses wants them stoned to death for God says
so.
The Ripper was not killing the prostitutes for sexual perversion. He never had
sex with them and no semen from masturbation was found at the crime scenes. His
frenzy was hatred not of women in general but of fallen women - prostitutes. It
is said that the suspect Aaron Kosminski can be eliminated for he suffered from
compulsive masturbation in public. He would have been found masturbating over
the bodies had he been the killer. That is nonsense for he knew the danger of
being caught.
The Ripper showed signs of anger against female genitalia. He performed
mutilations in the genital area of four of his victims - he may not have had a
chance to do this with Catherine Eddowes the exception in the sense that though
he attacked her uterus he did not attack the vagina with his knife. This is most
probably a sign of a man who contracted syphilis from prostitutes and attacked
the genitals of prostitutes to release his anger. It is not known if Kosminski
had syphilis but it is clear that people at the time surmised that he did.
The Ripper took trophies – parts of the bodies of these women to satisfy his
feeling that he was stronger than these women, that he was in control. There is
no evidence that the Ripper got any sexual enjoyment out of doing this. The fact
that he took Eddowes’ kidney – an organ nobody would associate with sex - and
engaged in abdominal mutilations and ripped intestines out shows that the crimes
were motivated by anger not perverted sexuality. This man was not a sex killer
of any description.
The killer was angry with the bodies of prostitutes and his attacks on the
genitals suggest that the basis of his anger was something that happened to him
as a result of sex with prostitutes. The Ripper would certainly have felt anger
against prostitutes if sex with them had given him syphilis. For those who
question that that was how he got the disease they must remember that syphilis
was caught mostly by men who went with prostitutes.
Ripper victims were displayed with legs apart in a mock sexual position. The
Ripper wanted to mock their sexuality and make a display of them. This could be
interpreted as, “Here they are ready for sex but I want to put you off the idea
of having sex with them”. This interpretation would surely indicate that the
Ripper considered prostitutes dangerous and to be objects not people.
The attacks on the womb especially with Annie Chapman suggest a desire to punish
the womb for being the source of life. The Ripper removed her uterus and the top
of her vagina and took them away. He removed the uterus when he killed Catherine
Eddowes as well. The Ripper did not hate his own life – he didn’t want to end up
hanged.
This is best seen as pure religious misogyny. Religion always hated the womb and
his biblical faith told him childbirth and sex were dirty.