Love the person but hate the harm they do to themselves? Is that how to understand loving the sinner and hating the sin?
Religion says that God only hates sin for it is bad
for his children so it is about them not him. But if that is true what does he
punish it for? Punishing in his case is his trying to force people not to sin by
making an example of some. So if he is not that bothered about free will
one wonders why he lets sin happen in the first place.
Sin is not really sin if it is just about harm. A man hitting a child is about more than just him hurting the child. It implies that if you could magically repair the child when the hitting stops or stop the pain then hitting is fine. Why does God never reason with you why you must not do wrong but commands instead? Why does he even get involved? Why is he not as worried about earthquakes and diseases?
God hates sin. Though God hating is a metaphor it reflects the fact that if God could suffer intensely for our sins by hating them he would. That implies that we who can hate should hate them intensely. If hating sin leads to hating sinners or is hating the sinner but being in denial then belief in God is responsible for all the harm done in the world by believing people who oppose those who they see as sinners.
What about the argument that if hitting a child can be magically prevented from harming then the problem is that the hitting says about the person hitting? That view leads to a person only caring about their own virtue and that is actually a crafty form of selfishness. St Denis said we must not admire or revere the perfections of creatures. That becomes a form of idolatry where human good qualities end up being preferred to God. And you want to be like them so you can admire yourself too. Even if there is no God one still ends up not caring if there is as long as one is seen as good and one sees oneself as good. The principle is still trampled on.
Love the sinner and hate the sin is the corner stone
of Christianity and other religions. It is the cornerstone of faith in
God.
Those who confuse it with, "Love the person but hate
the harm they do to themselves" need to see that pain is not the sin. The rule
is not necessarily religious - even the biggest sceptic about right and wrong
can hate to see a person suffer.
To oppose somebody’s self-destructive ways is seen as
good. But to oppose is to oppose the person. Opposing is violent in the sense
that you want to hurt the person by stopping them doing what they want. It’s
evil even if it is for their own good in the future. It is like hitting a child
so that he learns how to forgive. Opposing is not good - its evil though the
results of doing it may be good. Good is not snow white but one of countless
shades of grey.
Catholics are to love the sinner and hate the sin.
Their God does that too. Everybody feels that they do not like such an
idea for it contains a hidden premise: treat a person as if they are not bad at
all but their actions are. Putting it that way shows the rank hypocrisy.
People are given a law that is going to fail. That is bullying in itself.
The person who thinks love sinner and hates sin makes
sense is making a mistake. They mistake hating what a person is doing to
themselves for hating the sin. It is not the same. You can hate a person hurting
themselves without thinking of it as a sin or something morally bad.
A sinner is a person perceived by God as a morally bad
person who deserves to suffer for what they have done and hopefully will suffer
for it. You cannot hate a sin. What you hate is what a sin says about the
sinner. It’s the sinful character that is hated. In other words, it’s the
person.
Love sinner and hate sin is confused with a philosophy
of hating the harm a person does to themselves and loving the person. But that
philosophy actually contradicts it! To hate sin is about wishing it was possible
for the sin, which is really the person, to be paid back. Love the person but
hate the harm they do to themselves is about wishing the harm could be taken
away.
Imagine the two rules could agree.
Then which rule is the most important?
If God is unimportant to you then it will be, "Love
the person but hate the harm they do to themselves."
If God matters to you the important rule will be,
"Love the sinner or breaker of God's law. But hate his law-breaking for it
offends God." That is what love the sinner and hate the sin means.
If you love people, then cease to regard God as
important.
Love the sinner and hate the sin is no true friend to
those who wish to stop people being harmed. Religion if it is good to
sinners is good in spite of its beliefs thus it can take no credit.
BOOKS CONSULTED
BEYOND GOOD AND EVIL, Friedrich Nietzsche, Penguin,
London, 1990
CATECHISM OF THE CATHOLIC CHURCH, Veritas, London,
1995
ECUMENICAL JIHAD, Peter Kreeft, Ignatius Press, San
Francisco, 1996
GOD IS NOT GREAT, THE CASE AGAINST RELIGION,
Christopher Hitchens, Atlantic Books, London, 2007
HANDBOOK OF CHRISTIAN APOLOGETICS, Peter Kreeft and
Ronald Tacelli, Monarch, East Sussex, 1995
HOW DOES GOD LOVE ME? Radio Bible Class, Grand Rapids,
Michigan, 1986
IN DEFENCE OF THE FAITH, Dave Hunt, Harvest House,
Eugene, Oregon, 1996
MADAME GUYON, MARTYR OF THE HOLY SPIRIT, Phyllis
Thompson, Hodder & Stoughton, London, 1986
MORAL PHILOSOPHY, Joseph Rickaby SJ, Stonyhurst
Philosophy Series, Longmans Green and Co, London, 1912
OXFORD DICTIONARY OF PHILOSOPHY, Simon Blackburn,
Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1996
PRACTICAL ETHICS, Peter Singer, Cambridge University
Press, England, 1994
PSYCHOLOGY, George A Miller, Penguin, London, 1991
REASON AND BELIEF, Brand Blanschard, George Allen and
Unwin Ltd, 1974
REASONS FOR HOPE, Ed Jeffrey A Mirus, Christendom
College Press, Virginia, 1982
THE ATONEMENT: MYSTERY OF RECONCILIATION, Kevin
McNamara, Archbishop of Dublin, Veritas, Dublin, 1987
SINNERS IN THE HANDS OF AN ANGRY GOD, Jonathan
Edwards, Sword of the Lord, Murfreesboro, Tennessee, undated
THE BRIEF OF ST ANTHONY OF PADUA (Vol 44, No 4)
THE IMITATION OF CHRIST, Thomas A Kempis, Translated
by Ronald Knox and Michael Oakley, Universe, Burns & Oates, London, 1963
THE LIFE OF ALL LIVING, Fulton J Sheen, Image Books,
New York, 1979
THE NEW WALK, Captain Reginald Wallis, The Christian
Press, Pembridge Villas, England, undated
THE PROBLEM OF PAIN, CS Lewis, Fontana, London, 1972
THE SATANIC BIBLE, Anton Szandor LaVey, Avon Books,
New York, 1969
THE STUDENT’S CATHOLIC DOCTRINE, Rev Charles Hart BA,
Burns & Oates, London, 1961