THE HARE KRISHNA MOVEMENT
ISKCON or the International Society for Krishna Consciousness was created in the
sixties by Abhay Charan De Prabhupada in New York.
The movement is fanatically devoted to the ancient Hindu god, Krishna. It
advocates the chanting of the mantra, Hare Krishna, in order to win salvation
from suffering and to develop a perfect love for God. The chanting is called
Sankirtana. The chant is the mahamantra.
The cult has been known for telling lies to get new members and money and has
been guilty of attempting to brainwash. It must be good at conditioning people
when it offers an ascetic lifestyle in honour of an amoral god! The Perfection
of Yoga (page 7), tells us that the guru who believes in and is authorised by
the cult says only what Krishna says. The implication being that he should be
obeyed as Krishna should be obeyed.
Krishna is infallible (page 273, 321, Bhagavad-Gita). And Krishna has to come
first and everything must be done for his sake. One must do everything, even
eat, just for him (ibid, page 15). One must not work to get anything from it but
to please Krishna (ibid, page 8). Good has to be done for Krishna says it is
good and not out of any self-interest (Bhagavad-Gita, page 296). Arjuna was told
to kill in war because Krishna desired it in the scripture the Bhagavad-Gita and
Prabhubpada commented that everything ought to be done for the sake of Krishna
(page 39). Being a slave for Krishna is silly enough when one is more sure of
one’s own existence than his but is worsened by the fact that the evidence for
the existence of the historical Krishna is so feeble that it might not be
evidence at all.
The religion makes the error of assuming that miracles prove that the
incarnations of God like Krishna are indeed divine. But they believe in
miracle-working demons and demigods! Prabhupada detested the notion that the
miracle stories about Krishna were not meant to be taken literally (page 70,
Life Comes from Life). The authors of the stories never said that they were
fairy-stories so they meant them to be taken historically. Holiness is not a
sign that if a person claims to be God he is God for God can do what appears
sinful but it is not really sin (page 42, Sri Isopanisad).
The sect adores images of Krishna believing that he becomes the image in order
to be more accessible to his worshippers (page 24, Sri Isopanisad). But when the
mahamantra is all-important a person should not be looking for images at all but
trying to awaken awareness of Krishna indwelling the heart. Why adore the image
if Krishna is within you and if the material image is a distraction from
focusing on his spiritual essence and presence in a spiritual manner? Would
Krishna do such a stupid miracle as to become an image?
Incredibly, Prabhubpada taught that the lake of Radha in India, Sri Radha-kunda,
is as loved by her lover Krishna as much as she is (page 90, The Nectar of
Instruction).
And it is disturbing that a person will be considered the best of the bunch if
he says the name of Krishna (page 54, The Nectar of Instruction). Why not God?
Why not Jesus?
The cult teaches that the Sankirtana, tears of love for God and ecstasy – the
trance that the chant puts you in – get sins forgiven (page The Nectar of
Instruction). God would not want people to be forgiven for going into a trance
but for doing good. There is another problem. If the chant forgives sins then
only a sinner can chant it. That is impossible and contradictory. A sinner
cannot please God or have a real relationship with him. To stick to sin while
doing good is telling God you will not fully love him so the goodness is really
and wholly evil.
The cult asserts that the Lord’s disciples are cleansed from sin because they
eat food that they offer to God (page 59, Bhagavagad-Gita). It is not offering
the food you eat that should do this but good works. Nobody would merit praise
for offering food for that is too easy. The Catholic Church is guilty of the
same blasphemy against God for saying that the Eucharist does more to make you
holy than good works.
According to Walter Martin (page 96, The New Cults) the sect believes that
Krishna is impersonal for he is identical to the creation. Josh Mc Dowell and
Don Stewart say the same thing (page 130, Concise Guide to Today’s Religions).
If it does then the cult is saying that all things are caused and controlled by
something that ought not to be loved for the person is superior. Also, if God is
as impersonal as a machine then how can they be sure that we his creation are
not being deceived by him all the time? He cannot be trusted at all when he lets
error and lies happen. We should deny the existence of this God in order to be
able to trust our reason and our senses. He is an affront to human dignity.
The Hare Krishna cult calls Krishna a person and the Supreme Personality of
Godhead. Krishna is the supreme person in the impersonal God or he is a person
and not a person at the same time or he s just a person with an impersonal
spirit attached! If God is impersonal then persons are illusions for God is all
and personality cannot come out of impersonality when that is all there is.
Prabhupada used this argument himself (page 29, The Path of Perfection).
The cult says that nobody can beat Krishna for tricking people and telling lies
(page 204, Bhagavad-Gita). Krishna confessed his dishonesty. When it is sinners
he has come to save and he feels entitled to lie to them or to cheat them by
sending them to a religious fraud (page 91, Life Comes from Life) who can know
if he is really saved? Krishna could be getting revenge for some misdeed done in
a past life. What use is a saviour who you cannot trust and devotion to a God
who may not be devoted to you? Such devotion would not be real but
self-degradation. The errors in the scriptures of the cult and in its doctrine
would count as evidence that Krishna is determined to make fools of its members.
The religion claims that all who really wish to find Gods’ truth will come to
the Hare Krishna teachers to find it. This makes the faith very divisive and
self-righteous.
The cult defies science and says there is life everywhere in the universe even
on the moon! (page 1, Life Comes from Life). The divinely inspired Prabhupada
said this. Those who say that life came from non-living matter are stereotyped
and castigated as rascals and frauds even though when life is made from matter
it could have come from matter (page 15, 136, Life Comes from Life).