IF VIRTUE IS IN THE MIND AS SOCRATES AND PLATO SAID THEN NOBODY CAN BE BLAMED FOR SIN THUS FREE WILL IS A PROBLEM DOCTRINE
Socrates and Plato said that all virtue is intellectual which implies that
nobody is to blame when they do wrong (page 70, Moral Philosophy). In other
words, if you are smart and know what you are doing you will not do wrong and if
you do it is stupidity which is not your fault. In response to this, the Church
says that though it is true that stupidity causes evil actions it is still a
mistake to say that virtue is all intellectual. It says:
A. The will does not always follow what the mind knows to be right.
B. The voice of reason can be made faint under the grip of emotion and weakness.
C. The mind has to know what is right and impose its will on the body which
rebels (page 73-74).
B and C really say the same thing that the body clouds the mind. That has no
relevance to answering the problem for virtue can be intelligence through and
through and still be twisted or silenced by powerful forces outside the
intellect or thinking function. For example, when you are scared out of your
wits, the intelligence is silenced for you cannot think. One of the oldest
tricks used by religion is to give you reasons for believing in something that
do not work in the hope that you will not think for we all tend to oversimplify
out of laziness and or busyness so that the quantity of arguments for their
position looks convincing if you don’t study it out.
The first consideration, A, says that the will does not always follow what the
mind knows to be right. It is invalid for it makes a profound logical error.
Virtue is intelligence and that remains true even if the passions are unruly.
You can believe you know something. But if it is untrue then you only thought
you knew it. Knowing is a psychological state. The mind always follows what it
senses it knows to be true in the sense of experiencing that it knows. However,
only an objective standard can show if it really knew this.
A computer remains intelligent even if you put a virus in it for what the virus
does is make the computer intelligently misinterpret itself. A man whose mind is
set to think that 2+2=5 can be the most intelligent man alive. He is just wrong
but that does not make him stupid. He has the virtue of intelligence. The Church
is saying that though it is true that you can only do evil because you turn
stupid, part of you knows what you are doing when you do wrong so you are
guilty.
What happens when you know that something is right and do not do it but do the
opposite? You have got a desire for it to be wrong and not right. The reason is
that it would be more fun if it were wrong. The result is that what your
intelligence sees as right is changed by the fact that the desire has appeared
and made good look less good just like the man who sees 2+2=5 sees 2+2=4 as bad.
The evil act is caused by a computer virus in the brain if you like. The more
evil the act you perform the more deluded you were. So the worse the act the
less responsible you are if you have any responsibility or free will at all.
What happens is a defect in the intelligence hits it and you do wrong. You cease
to know as well as you did before that the act was wrong. You may tell yourself
as you do it that it is wrong but you do not really believe that anymore for you
have to see it as good or believe it is good to do it.
To say as the Church does that evil is not a thing but a perverted good and that
if evil were a thing there would be no solution for the problem of evil
(Handbook of Christian Apologetics, page 132) and then to claim that virtue is
not intelligence is to say that evil is the absence of intelligence which makes
no sense as we have seen. Evil must be a real thing and not just a perverted
good or perhaps it is not a perverted good at all but only a thing.
The main problem with A is that all our actions are caused by our feelings and
our thoughts and the feelings are the most powerful element. Therefore A is the
same as B and C and is to be condemned with them.
If you read no other discussion on whether free will is true you will have all
the proof you need that free will is nonsense and tends to result in vindictive
rationalisations.
We can’t choose evil because it is evil but because we think it is good.
Religion admits this though it obviously refutes the free will doctrine. But
when you choose anything, it is not chosen because it is good or evil for when
you only have one thought in your mind the very milli-second when the will acts,
you are not thinking of it as good or evil. Suppose you had free will. If two
choices were equally good and bad you would not be able to choose if you choose
only what seems to be good to you. You would seize up. But if we are programmed
we cannot seize up. If we are programmed then there is no such thing as real
choice.
Finally, we love the desire we have for the thing we desire and not the thing
itself. This is the doctrine of Maxim 175 of Friedrich Nietzsche’s Beyond Good
and Evil. And it is absolutely true. Some will find it silly for it seems to
imply that you desire the desire and desire that desire and so on ad infinitum
which we know by experience is not true. All Nietzsche meant was that anything
we want it is not it we want but the happiness we think we are going to get from
it. The one desire for happiness is behind it all and so there is only one built
in desire for if you desire to be happy. We have no free will to care about God
or man or ourselves and all we care about is our happiness which is why religion
is has a problem with being rational and is prey to hypocrisy. You want money?
It is not the money you want at all but how you feel about it. You want it for
gratification. It is not money that causes you to feel that way - you just do.
LAST THOUGHT
Our psychology means we cannot use free will even if we have it. Having it might make you feel free without being free! You have eyes. You feel free to see even though somebody has glued your eyes. See the point?