THE CHRISTIAN AND ISLAMIC RELIGIONS BEHAVE LIKE LAMBS WHEN IN
CAPTIVITY, LIKE WOLVES WHEN THEY HAVE POWER
The best definition of Fundamentalism is that it seeks to put at least one
doctrine before people because it sees the doctrine as the simple truth and it
does not care about the real truth. Liberals may have some Fundamentalist
attitudes too. For example, "Christians" who distort the Bible to make it LGBT
friendly are trying to ruin scholarship and call anybody who knows the truth a
liar.
Fundamentalist religion thrives and often gets away with its crimes when the
membership seems too big for the state to eradicate the religion, or when the
religion is too powerful and when it is married to the state and maybe providing
"services" such as faith based schools or hospitals or whatever. It would be
much easier if the state could discern what belief it has is the most harmful
and dangerous and dwell on dealing with that.
Fundamentalism is always harmful. Fundamentalism can range from very light
Fundamentalism to every severe Fundamentalism that may even want to destroy the
world for God for example. Suppose somebody says that what the Bible says is
final and must never be doubted but simply obeyed. People tend to argue that
that person is a Fundamentalist. They are right for that person is putting
doctrine before everything else. The person might claim to love the truth. The
reality is this is a lie. The answer to that is that our charges are false if
the Bible is in fact true! To call the person a Fundamentalist implies you
think that what they believe is nonsense.
Despite "progressive" but actually elitist and arrogant attempts to make out
that only theologians or mystics can understand the New Testament, the fact
remains it was written in marketplace Greek - the koine of Alexander the Great.
It meant what it says and is for all and is for the ordinary person not the
theologian or mystic nut.
Bible believers are quite common in America. Liberals and politicians lie that
good Christians and Muslims treat their holy books as symbols and allegories.
First that cannot be done for the Bible and Koran ask to be taken seriously
instead of people coming up with fanciful readings that are not in the actual
text and they do report what they see as history.
Second few believers treat (mistreat!) their scriptures that way. 63% of
Americans declared the Bible means what it says in the 2005 Rasmussen poll. In
2014, a Gallup poll found that 28% accepted that the literal interpretation is
valid for the Bible is actually the word of God. As Christians have declined in
number the percentage is still high.
Third, if a scripture is just a symbol then historians can find no use for it.
Four, it is only a thin cover up for how violent those scriptures are. They
think that to admit the truth will lead to religion fueled violence.
You will find normal people even in the religions with the worst reputation for
being Fundamentalist. No religion can control every member completely. People's
human nature will come out no matter what a religion does to thwart it. Each
religion has a standard by which we can know what its required teaching is. The
official scriptures, documents and leadership is what must be examined in order
to declare a religion Fundamentalist or not. If a religion commands murder, and
most of its members condemn murder, the religion is still Fundamentalist and the
dissidents are just disobedient and not reflective of the religion. They are not
real believers but hypocrites.
FAITH AS KNOWLEDGE
Fundamentalism treats beliefs not as ideas that are thought to be probably true
but as facts. In other words, it refuses to admit that there is room for doubt.
True Fundamentalism claims to be an infallible ideology.
Even the most arrogant and bigoted Atheist who says, “I am right and everybody
else is wrong”, is not a Fundamentalist for he cannot really believe he is
infallible. He would need to believe that some magic power is making him
infallible in order to really believe that he is. We all make mistakes in
thinking we know something and that can’t make us all Fundamentalists. True
Fundamentalism is when somebody claims that there is a God or spirit or psychic
power that confers a magical infallibility on him. If the Fundamentalist doesn't
claim this, the Fundamentalist certainly feels it.
The Roman Catholic Church gives the world a bad example. It says that faith is
knowledge and absolute trust is required. American conservative Protestant
Christianity is far worse.
True secularism is the only thing that can never be Fundamentalist. Thus
anything that varies from it is Fundamentalism - no matter how liberal or
reasonable it pretends to be. Secularism is always open to changing its mind
based on the evidence. Thus it is not Fundamentalist.
The doctrine that God punishes is a Fundamentalist one. It is dangerous for us.
If we do not bother punishing we feel that God will step in. It is wrong to
teach any doctrine that may lead us to put faith before people.
Mere belief in God endorses Fundamentalism. The notion that belief is the best
thing we can ever believe implies that there should be a bias against atheism or
agnosticism.
Prayer is always a Fundamentalist activity. The praying person is urged to see
that prayer works which really means that the person is being asked to remember
the times it seemed to work and to forget the times it didn’t or to pretend that
it. Prayer is training in Fundamentalism. It is its bedrock. Worse, prayer is
done to induce the feeling that you have done good in praying. But you haven't!
People say they have no problem with a person engaging in Fundamentalist
thinking as long as they don’t try to ram their ideas down the throats of others
either by force or by use of the written word. They should. Fundamentalist
thinking will lead to that if the Fundamentalists get enough money, power and
support.
We must remember that if there are Christian theologians who honestly look at
rational arguments against the faith (I said if - this is hypothetical) it is
sometimes said that they are not dogmatic, not proud and not arrogant and not
know-alls who misguidedly think they know it all. But the same cannot be said of
priests and laity who are not theologians. They do not have the same knowledge
and yet they insist on obedience to a revealed faith and are proud of it. They
are definitely Fundamentalists.
The Church uses its proclamation that its faith is a kind of knowledge as an
excuse to justify hurting people in the name of faith. It uses this as excuse to
justify ideas such as abortion being wrong even to save the mother’s life
despite how much harm may ensue. The reality is that if you depend on nothing
but random nature, then you may have to be a step ahead of it and have an
abortion for nothing is looking after you. That is one example. There are many
others.
Fundamentalist Christians claim they believe that only the Bible has authority
in matters of religion. This is a lie. They treat their own assumptions as the
word of God as well. For example, when Jesus asked people to hate their parents
and children to serve him they say "he didn’t mean it literally. It is
hyperbole. By hate he only meant that parents and children must come second to
him." And even if they didn't engage in rationalising, they only believe the
Bible is the word of God because they assume that it is. In other words, it
strictly speaking, not the Bible they consider to be the voice of their God but
their own prejudices, desires and assumptions.
The Fundamentalist's faith makes a virtue out of arrogance that is dressed up to
look like humility. We see this in its claim that faith is knowledge. If faith
is knowledge, then what use is science? Why should we attach any importance to
science?
A religion that makes way for Fundamentalism is to blame for the evil done in
its name even when it protests against the evil.
The worst Fundamentalist is the one who claims to know their faith is true. What
they really mean is that they feel it is true and that amounts to knowing! The
Fundamentalist who becomes a believer because of thinking that the evidence for
faith is wonderful and excellent is actually less of a Fundamentalist than the
former. This person is really a rationalist who has made big mistakes or been
misinformed.
To say I know my faith is true because I can feel it is the height of arrogance
and intolerance. Those are the people who will read and understand the proofs
that their faith is lies or wrong and seem unaffected by them. They are being
unfair to the proofs and to those who have discovered and who stand by the
proofs.
LIBERALS ARE FUNDAMENTALISTS TOO!
Fundamentalists are defined as being extreme, guilty of putting beliefs before
people and of being narrow in their thinking.
Liberals like to accuse Fundamentalists of taking the Scriptures literally. That
accusation is surprisingly a sign of the liberal's narrow mentality. In fact,
Fundamentalists say that all scriptures use symbolism and clearly indicate when
a symbolic understanding is called for. For example, a Jew and Muslim might talk
about the hand of God and see the expression in their scriptures. But they do
not mean that God really has a hand or a body. But when a scripture says all
things were made in six days and science refutes that, they stand by scripture.
Liberals will pretend that the six days is a metaphor. But that is really
saying, "If science seems refute our scriptures, it is our understanding that is
wrong." Translation: "If our Bible is proven wrong we will pretend that its
tales are not literally true and were meant to be only stories to inspire us."
Such an approach is dishonest. They lie to people in the name of religion as
much as Fundamentalists do. They are Fundamentalists themselves under all the
cosmetics.
A Fundamentalist who has made errors of judgment or who has been misinformed and
who thinks the Bible is the absolute authority even if it commands murder is
less of a Fundamentalist than the liberal. The liberal says there is a God and
then he himself makes his own words the word of God.
Both liberals and Fundamentalists state that God or some supernatural being
comes first.
RESPONSE: The people and creatures you share this earth with matter. Leave
beings whose existence you can’t see or prove out of it. You are a
Fundamentalist in spirit even if you are a "liberal."
PICK AND MIX CATHOLICISM
The true Catholic refuses to deliberately reject the Catholic faith and what it
teaches. He is a member of the Catholic belief community. He is a member of the
believers. He is a member in Church law as well. Those "Catholics" who reject
the view that the shepherds of the Church the bishops and the popes know best
and can exercise infallibility are not acting as Catholics even if they are
Catholics. The believing Catholics accept that there is only a single and united
and sacred and apostolic and Catholic Church through which Jesus teaches us the
truth today. Even atheists must agree with that. If you want to speak as a
Mormon then you must speak in line with what your religion teaches. Your
religion is bigger than you.
If Catholicism is Fundamentalist, the liberal Catholics are drawing people to
it. The liberal Catholic converts find out that the liberals are dishonestly
watering down and inventing their own standards. They want to be really Catholic
and they end up Fundamentalist.
That is an example of how liberalism is the friend of the Fundamentalism it
abuses.
CHARACTERISTICS OF FUNDAMENTALISM
Some authority must be believed and followed. We never get away from it. Even
the individualist thinks that individualism is his authority.
Fundamentalism may enrol you as a member and tell you that you are obliged to
obey it when it hasn’t given you sufficient evidence that you should do so. For
example, the Catholic Church manipulates young children who cannot understand
Catholicism properly to believe they are members of the Church and bound to obey
it.
Fundamentalism may advocate hatred against sinners and heretics and unbelievers
openly or it may hide it under the doctrine of loving the sinner and hating the
sin. Can you hate human life but love all people? Sins are not things. Sins
describe not what people do but what kind of people they are. To hate anybody or
their actions for religious reasons is putting faith before people. I should not
hate John's adultery because it breaks God's command. But I should hate its role
in bringing him pain. See the difference?
Fundamentalism says,
My religion is right.
RESPONSE: You may believe it is right but that is all that you can say. You
cannot talk as if it is right when you only believe that it is. You cannot talk
as if you are certain when you are not.
We do not understand why God forbids us to do this thing for example plan a
family responsibly through contraception. He knows better than us that doing it
will not be for the best.
RESPONSE: All people need to do for vicious Fundamentalism to thrive is to
"respect" and tolerate that belief!
RELIGION YOU ARE NOT OFF THE HOOK!
The Church cares more for its doctrine than the truth – like most religions it
refuses to change its mind when proved wrong. Such a faith cannot expect anybody
to take it seriously when it forbids anything. The Roman Catholic faith
represented by the priests and the bishops and especially the pope are
ultimately to blame for all the harm done by Roman Catholics.
The Church uses science and pretends to be compatible with it. But how could
science which is based on the notion of looking for evidence all the time and
changing your mind if the evidence justifies it be agreeable with religion which
instead of changing its mind refuses to listen to the evidence or proof that it
is wrong? Science is about seeking disproof.
Some Catholics fall away. Many Catholics that do evil in the name of religion
are accused of being disobedient and of being bad Catholics. But are they when
their religion makes them feel and believe they ought to do these evils? Whose
the bad guy?
If Catholicism starts producing religious terrorists, it will say they are
dissidents and not representatives of true Catholicism. But unless it
excommunicates them – and it won’t – they are representatives of true
Catholicism. The excommunication could last until they are released from the
excommunication in confession by a priest. An irrational religion cannot
complain if some members go very far in that irrationality even to the point of
genocide or murder.
There is more. The Catholic Church teaches contradictory doctrines and excuses
the contradictions by pretending they are mysteries. A religion that teaches
contradiction and practices it is implicitly endorsing the activities of those
who do deeds forbidden by the Church in the name of religion. For example, if
you ask people to contradict themselves and not to admit it, you cannot complain
if they start torturing heretics to death on the basis that it contradicts your
message. You are to blame for putting the feeling that they do right into them
as much as they are.
Catholicism has refused to take responsibility for much evil done by the Church.
And the evil is hellish to even read about. A healthy system will not produce
evil of that potential. What is the real state of the forest that produces such
bad trees? Also the faith increases the intent to be evil.
An atheist who murders does great harm to another and society and perhaps his
own family. Religion makes the evil he intended far worse by saying he intends
to insult and break with the God who loves him and who died for him and that he
intends to reject his loved ones for all eternity by calling the punishment of
Hell on himself. Religion puts extreme evil in the heart. If we are going to do
evil, it is better for us to be atheists rather than believers.
Conclusion
All religion, even if it is not blatantly Fundamentalist, IS Fundamentalist! The
intolerance and bigotry become secrets of the heart. They are the seeds of
violent actions and strife. Religion of all kinds is the sea in which
Fundamentalism swims and often a Fundamentalist is only an obedient believer in
the religion. Conservative Muslim and Catholic and Christian groups that
emphasise an infallible source of truth, such as a prophet or scripture, always
grow and get strong. Such groups develop even in the midst of liberals so it is
safe to say that liberalism loses its appeal and that paves the way for
Fundamentalism. The last thing we need to say that religion and Fundamentalism
are two sides of the one problem and often they are really the one side.