The VERY Dark Side of
Forgiveness
What is forgiveness? Most of us take it as saying we are moving on after being
hurt by someone. Many water down the need for forgiveness by saying it does not
necessarily involve reconciliation. But real forgiveness will involve being
reconciled to the other person if circumstances allow it. If you cannot be
reconciled say because the person is dead at least you can still be willing to
reconcile if you could meet them. You have a reconciliation attitude.
Time seems to heal. You can treat a person as if you have forgiven them simply because time has passed and the wrong they did does not have the same sting anymore. That is not forgiveness but half-forgetting or forgetting. It is not forgiveness for the passing of time is corroding the sense of hurt. Real forgiveness involves admitting you are hurt.
A person who expresses guilt and shame over hurting you
will get forgiveness easier. That entails the person saying, "I was bad".
It will be, "I am bad" not just "I did a bad thing." The admission that
your badness makes you bad is to be the main thing. To say sorry implies
you are only regretting the bad results of your action not the action itself.
Love the sinner and hate the sin only makes forgiveness superficial and thus it
is dangerous.
People say nobody can be against mercy or compassion but few like the thought of
having to forgive. The difference between mercy and compassion is that mercy can
be granted to somebody without them being forgiven. Mercy only means a lesser
punishment than what they deserve. Forgiveness is a form of mercy but not the
only form. Reducing the punishment is mercy too.
Notice that if you have to reconcile with the enemy or the victim if you are the
enemy then they are being treated better than the vast majority of people. You
will not have that kind of time for a stranger in another country. You are
indifferent to the plight of most people and the person who hurts you is
rewarded with your care and attention. Is it any wonder that those who say they
forgive are often only pretending? Is it any wonder people get angry at being
told to forgive for they feel that advice shows no concern for the harm the bad
person did to them?
To be clear, what is forgiveness? Maybe it helps to see what it requires.
Forgiveness can be voluntary or involuntary.
What if it just happens and it is not a decision?
Nobody cares if it is a choice or not as long as it happens.
Christianity teaches that life is all about choosing God and being merciful like
him so it needs forgiveness to be voluntary. That is an example of how people
have been fooled to think that Christianity is the religion for them and
humankind.
Anyway forgiveness requires two things.
+ There is how you decide that you move on in your head. That is an either/or.
+ There is how you change your heart so that move on in your emotions. That is a
process that may grow one day and backtrack the next. It is not an either/or.
You take each day as it comes. Eventually you hope you will no longer want any
revenge and you hope things will be good for the person who did you wrong.
Forgiveness according to some does not mean a need to tell others they are
forgiven. It is not about saying what happened is okay or that it is forgotten
and in the past. It is about living through the hurt without wanting vengeance
on the wrongdoers. That makes it about you not the enemies. There is no healing
of relationships and thus it is not really forgiveness at all. And surely evil
people who receive your mercy and pardon need to see you give it so that they
may be drawn to the beauty of mercy?
Forgiveness is fraught with complications.
The dark side of forgiveness is that as far as feelings go it may be very
incomplete.
The dark side of forgiveness is when it is made the goal. In fact, healing
yourself from past hurts should be the goal.
The dark side of forgiveness is how it has to be totally unpressured. There must
be nobody telling you to forgive or worse commanding you to. You must not do it
in order to feel you are morally better than the person who hurt you or anybody
else. It has to be free. A God commanding you to forgive is more intrusive
than a human being commanding just because the God can see your heart and the
person cannot. He should not be telling you to forgive never mind
commanding it!
The dark side of forgiveness is how it is about the evil person and not you.
The dark side of forgiveness is that it risks you being an enabler even if you
don’t mean to be.
The dark side of forgiveness is that it seems to demand reconciliation as well.
Some say that forgiveness means you don’t necessarily have to go out and
befriend the enemy. But surely that would only be okay if you could not find the
enemy? Reconciliation is about befriending.
The dark side of forgiveness is that it absolves the evil person who hurt you.
We use absolve in the sense of justification. Justification is the Christian
idea that the evil person’s sins really cease to exist by God’s power so that
you become as if you never sinned and you are as if you never sinned.
The dark side of forgiveness is that if you forgive for you want a better future
and you deserve it, it will be hard to feel you deserve it say for example you
suffered at the hands of a neglectful parent.
The dark side of forgiveness is when it is seen as the only alternative to
revenge or a vengeful attitude which sort of forces you to forgive for these are
horrible things. They hurt the person who harbour those feelings the most.
The dark side of forgiveness is when it demands to be performed even at your
expense.
The dark side of forgiveness is when it asks you not to give the evil person the
benefit of the doubt.
The dark side of forgiveness is when it needs you have empathy towards the
person who hurt you.
The dark side of forgiveness is recognising that an intended wrong was done to
you and that it is a fact. Forgiveness is confirming and confessing that an
intended wrong was done to you. Excusing the wrong is out. Those who say
they never judge but just forgive are lying for you judge a person and then
forgive. The two go together.
The dark side of forgiveness is that it does not necessarily help you or the
other person. It affects only your inner life. It is trying to help the inside
not the outside.
The dark side of forgiveness is when it does not ask the offender to do
something to correct the wrong she has done. Forgiveness needs a wrong healed so
it wants the healing of both perpetrator and victim.
The dark side of forgiveness is how hard it is to forgive a person who you
cannot help seeing as somehow better than you, somebody who is too great to be
your equal. Many relationships by definition are not relationships of equals.
The dark side of forgiveness is how it can stop you understanding your pain and
how it is healing. Forgiveness does not mean you are dealing with the pain or
that the pain will not get worse. At times you may not be aware of the pain or
something is dulling it. But it is still there. Thinking you have forgiven adds
to that pain.
The dark side of forgiveness is that religious leaders do not really care how
you feel towards the person who hurt you. They want you to tell yourself they
have been forgiven by you though you seethe with anger. Aristotle taught that
morality is about what will make you happy and about fulfilling yourself. Thomas
Aquinas agreed but added that spiritual happiness is what matters most. Both
argued that happiness is not about how you feel but about how you act. If you
are miserable but doing the right thing by others and by God and yourself then
you are happy. You are well in the way it counts.
If forgiveness is good, then it often leads you to rationalise or make excuses
for the people who hurt you. You are told to think of the most positive
interpretation of what the person did and why and then forgive it. And why are
you encouraged to water down the evil another did to you or to risk watering it
down and not encouraged to water down and accept the fact that you do not
forgive.
“I am trying to forgive you” is better than “I forgive you”. Why? Because it
admits that real pardon is a day to day struggle.
If there is a God we have to forgive. Jesus said that we cannot ask God to forgive us if there are people who we refuse to forgive. That is bullying. In the light of the doctrine that rejecting another person leads to everlasting damnation unless repented this is bullying too. Telling a person to forgive something that was done particularly something terrible is putting pressure on them and making them feel like dirt. The person will feel they are being asked to forget about justice. Surely forgiveness and justice should always work in a way that one does not undermine or weaken the other? Pressing people to forgive can lead to them thinking they do forgive when they do not and they end up trying to make themselves believe the bad person is not so bad or did not mean to do the terrible thing they did to you.
Some say that if you pressure a person to forgive the problem is not with
forgiveness or forgiving but with your approach. They say that giving into
injustice and trying to justify or excuse what the person has done to you is not
forgiveness but you victimising yourself. Some say the answer is to forgive at a
distance – don’t let the person near you to hurt you again.
If there is no God we do not have to forgive though we should forgive those who we may need in times of trouble. God makes forgiveness a form of bullying because then you have to forgive no ifs or buts.
Jesus said that if you do good and are not taking reasonable precautions to avoid people knowing it then you have your reward but will get no reward from God. That would seem to tell you to forgive at a distance. Others say that forgiving should be a step towards reconciling. Reconciling would bond people while forgiveness in itself would not. It is clear that Christianity does stress forgiveness more than reconciliation which makes it a bad religion.
Jesus cried, “Love your enemy.” You are meant to forgive not for yourself but for the other person. No wonder it has been so difficult for believers that he may as well have said nothing. His religion has been so passive-aggressive that his teaching on forgiveness could be to blame.
To forgive you have to condemn and judge the person first so it is not as sweet
as it seems and implies a forgiving but also nasty God if you don’t let him
forgive.
The Christians say that as God is the source from which all good comes it is worse to offend him than to hurt a person. Indeed the only reason hurting a person is wrong is because he bans it and is offended by it. Thus it follows that offending God is always bad and terrible and you can never say, “I cannot or will not forgive x for I was never as bad as him.” That is not the point. The Church teaches that if there is a choice then get God’s pardon not that of others. Thus the religion is not a true religion of peace.
Also all letting go of hurts is not necessarily forgiveness. It could be that
you let it go not because it is forgiven but because time heals it or makes the
memory of the experience less caustic or because you have new troubles to focus
on. The accurate view is that time does not heal or cure but distracts.
It does not help us forget. The forgetting helps itself and if it happens
over time that does not mean time had a role. Time is not the great
healer. It certainly does not heal any wound never mind all wounds.
Forgiveness as preached by Christ is very victimising. It victimises the forgiver and the person forgiven who is given begrudged forgiveness that is more cognitive dissonance than anything else. And its cruel to have somebody think they are forgiven when the forgiveness is not free, generous and authentic. Christianity will only produce fake forgiving that will show its true colours. It often does!
Religion certainly invites and encourages you to forgive others. It is
unwise to encourage a person to forgive somebody who hurt them terribly or
endangered them as there is a risk that the offender could be looking for a
chance to re-inflict suffering on them and damage them even more. In religion,
God is seen as the one who heals the bad person and also the bad situation. This
is a dangerous doctrine for it makes your letting the bad person into your life
again about God not them. It is made a matter of trust in God. The
rationale is that if the person attacks you again it is not God's fault for the
person just stopped letting God help. In that way the healing is reversed.
You are now told you were right to forgive for how the person reverted after was
their own responsibility.