THE CATHOLIC CHURCH AND ECUMENISM
Ecumenism is about fostering greater religious agreement, ethical agreement and,
to a little extent, community relations between different religions. It tends to
be more about bringing religious systems into bigger unity than about uniting
the people that comprise the different faiths.
The Roman Catholic Church entered the ecumenical movement at Vatican II in the
1960’s for the first time. Against the accusation that ecumenism involves the
Catholic Church treating other religions as good as itself, it is said that
prayer in common is not the same thing as worship in common. Worship in common
is forbidden by the Church.
The Church from the beginning was anti-ecumenism shows that Vatican II was
altering Catholic teaching and this is heresy for the constant traditions of the
Church from its beginning are infallible for the Church cannot be taught error
by the Holy Spirit. To teach that one religion is as good as another is the most
serious heresy possible and makes you an apostate, one who has abandoned
Christian faith entirely. Christian acts and beliefs are replaced with
preferences and feelings so that the apostate looks like a Christian. This is
the heresy of Modernism condemned by Pope St Pius X who warned that Modernists
sound like Catholics and call themselves Catholics but indeed are not.
Leo XIII taught that Anglican orders were invalid for they didn’t intend to
ordain priests that could offer the sacrifice of the Mass. The disbelief in
dogma or the voice of God implied by Vatican II is a far more serious departure
from the faith meaning that Vatican II ordinations and sacraments can’t be
valid. That the Church didn’t break in two - though there was a small schism in
1988 - at Vatican II over the new heresies being officially being taught by the
Church certainly makes one wonder if there is any sincerity at all in the clergy
of this religion.
Protestants ceased to be classified as heretics at Vatican II. They are now
separated brethren. This is rubbish for the word heretic means choice, choosing
to go your own way and not Christ’s and Protestantism teaches private
interpretation of the Bible allowing each one to think and interpret scripture
as he pleases. The short Second Epistle of John (supposedly the apostle John) to
the elect lady and her children says that if anybody comes to the Christian
without agreeing with all the doctrine taught by Christ, he isn’t to be allowed
into their house or greeted and he who greets him shares his wicked work. It
doesn’t say that such persons are deliberate deceivers or anything. It would be
clear on that if it did refer to such. But it says that such people are
dangerous because they can mislead. This was written to a lady who learned from
the apostles themselves so how much more dangerous is it to risk your faith
today by praying with people of a different faith and listening to them preach?
It is certain then that ecumenism is declared sinful by the God of the Bible.
The Catholic Church claims that it has not altered its claim to be the one true
Church and yet it inconsistently says if you are a sincere member of another
faith you can be saved. But then if you can be saved in a false religion, then
that religion is good enough for as long as it gets you into Heaven who cares?
One false religion then will often be as good as another. So being the right
religion doesn’t matter. If being the right religion doesn’t matter then one
religion is as good as another. That is why the Catholic traditionalists who
accuse the Vatican II Church of looking Catholic but really being indifferentist
are correct. Ecumenism is a sin and a heresy for Christ commanded us to believe
that he was the way the truth and the life and to make disciples of all nations.
True Christianity is a divisive troublemaker.
If it doesn’t matter what religion you believe in then the only thing that
matters is sincerity. How can ecumenists place so much value on sincerity? If it
is okay to believe what you want and encourage error then insincerity can’t be
that bad for it only harms yourself! What about the people who believe that
religious insincerity isn't a bad thing? St Teresa of Liseux admitted that there
were times she did not believe in God. But yet she prayed and remained a nun.
And she is praised for her pretence.
A priest once said, "Let us work to rid society of corruption and drugs and
suicide and its problems. It does not matter who we have to work with. We must
all work together. It matters not if we are Catholic or Protestant or Hindu or
atheist. We have good hearts and a willingness to help." But for a Catholic who
knows his faith properly, it does matter. The Catholic Church is supposed to be
God's only real Church, the one ark of salvation, therefore the good works of
the Church will have to be emphasised and the good works of outsiders ignored.
The Catholic would say this is not spite but so that people get attracted to the
one true religion and enjoy the blessings that being part of it bestows.
A Catholic priest said, "When people say that one religion is as good as
another, they are usually referring to a series of platitudes: Be kind to one
another. Help the weak and needy. Respect the other person as a person. Tell the
truth. These are indeed common to all religions because they are part of the
moral law. This is religious indifferentism."
The problem with it is that it confuses good and evil with moral and immoral.
Good and evil are not about duties and the threat of punishment or retribution.
Morality is. Some religions say we must be given encouragement to do good and
deny that we should use the concept of duty to pressure anybody. We should not
punish.
The Catholic Church says that division and hostility between the denominations
of Christianity is a scandal and so all Christians must work for unity.
The Church today still claims to be the one true Church. It says this does not
mean that God cannot influence other religions towards the truth. The Church
says that God has revealed his law to us through reason and intuition and the
result is that this truth to varying degrees exists in every religion. Ecumenism
is said to be a celebration of what is true in other Churches. For Catholics,
that means other religions are welcomed only in so far as they concur with
Catholicism. How then can Buddhists or Hindus then feel comfortable with that?
Catholic ecumenism is not to be confused with Pluralism. Pluralism holds that no
religion has all the answers so all should be accepted and welcomed. The more
the religions come together the more they can learn from each other.
Another notion is that each religion is the same at its core. It is thought that
it is only in the details that we will find contradictions.
To go to a Protestant Church gives that Church a reason to exist. If the Church
had no members but merely people who liked to worship there it would continue to
worship. Attending then implies approval for the central tenets of
Protestantism. That would be okay if Protestant errors were not serious. But
they are for Protestantism promises that serious sinners can go to Heaven
without repenting as long as they are washed in the blood of Jesus. And it might
be okay but it is not a 100% okay. This implies that Catholics cannot attend
Protestant worship.
To reject worship with Protestants is not rejecting people but the system of
ideas that they follow.
The huge majority of those who dismiss or ignore or deny the truth claims of
Christianity are from other religions. As it claims to be the truth, this makes
Christianity raise a rather nasty question. "Are they doing it on purpose?" Also
if Jesus is the uncompromising way, truth and life so is his religion then it
follows that there is no such thing as ignoring or dismissing. It's rejecting. It
is sectarian to even raise the question of whether it is the people of the other
religion's fault.
If you have a problem with religion and its purely cosmetic service of peace,
then leave religion. Don't be a participant in its problem-making.