Will determinism destroy morality?
People assume we somehow own and create our actions so that we are the cause as
persons. This is the doctrine of free will. Its opposite is determinism - the
notion that we only imagine we are in control.
Determinism says we have a will but we only feel free. It is programming. We do
not truly own our actions and choices.
If it is true and simplicity says it is then our souls are not destroyed so why
should believing it be soul-destroying?
Determinism gets its strength from showing there is no need to believe in free
will.
“If you really thought you had no free will you would not come out of bed for
what is the point?”
Answers – that is probably the only argument against determinism that anybody
considers essential. It is a discussion about meaning. But the power to create
your own actions is not necessarily about meaning. And to say you should stay in
bed if you don’t believe in free will is assuming you have the free will to stay
in bed. It's an argument against belief. It still tells us nothing about whether
we have free will or not.
Disbelief has not stopped the most ardent defenders of determinism from getting
out of bed and early too. If determinism can keep you in bed it can keep you out
too.
If you are not leaving your bed then the question "Is morality real?" is not an
issue. It becomes an issue when you open your eyes and waken.
The scaremongers maintain that if determinism is true then there is no morality.
True. But who gives a damn when we can still behave like moral free agents
would? The forces that control "our" will will program us to act in a good way
because determinism is true and stronger than us. We are lucky it programs us to
accept how it it uses us.
Knowing determinism is true or believing it is true cannot change how we are
made. Make no mistake, those who say determinism destroys morality really mean
that belief in it doe that!
Could we be happy if nature made people behave in a loving way towards us though
they were not free? Yes we would. We are happiest when we are sure that our
girlfriend or boyfriend or siblings or parents are FORCED by nature herself to
have great loving feelings towards us. The person who freely does good to us
gets less adulation from us. The parent who wants to hate the child often
cannot.
Determinism does not advocate treating people as automatons. People are not the
same as calculators or computers. What a person wants should be respected for
they have feelings and feel free and have a right to live according to their
nature when it harms none. All are priceless therefore equal.
Free will and determinism both might psyche some people up to behave cruelly.
Free will implies that we deserve all we get for deserve means earning and
consenting to good or bad treatment depending on the nature of the act. Free
will does justify hurting those who are supposedly deserving but determinism
does not. It means that whoever hurts you is not doing wrong in hurting you
though it may be wrong for other reasons. It would be wrong to have people
hurting themselves to feel sorry for you if you deserve your troubles.
Determinism implies that you are not terrible if you harm others for it is not
your fault but nature’s. There is nothing that we can do if people abuse the
doctrines. People will be happier without the negativity of judgement that free
will brings and when people are happier they are much less likely to harm. Even
for free will to imply that it is better when there is a choice to hurt a person
who is free for he deserves it to some extent than to hurt a person who is not
free which it does imply necessarily, is diabolical. Free will is just an
anarchist philosophy.
Determinism does say that what will happen will happen. But the determinist
cannot say that they should do evil for they will do it anyway for they can just
as easily say they should do good for they will do good anyway.
Determinists can be more optimistic and enthusiastic in trying to change people
for the better than indeterminists because they believe that if the right
buttons were pressed people would be healthy, happy and good. The indeterminist
just has to hope that they will change and that is all. Hope is associated with
fear. Free willism justifies fear and fear always leads to violence, first inner
violence against yourself and then against others and often explodes into outer
physical attacks on others for it is violence taking over you. When anybody says
that God does not want us to be afraid of him they should be laughed at. Free
will and religion are about fear and when they are not they should be. But
determinists hope as well you may say. But not to the extent that free willists
do.
If most people in your community believed in determinism or at least that free
will might exist but we should live as if it does not exist then sincere
goodness would be commoner. People know they will be seen as ill if they do
wrong and not as bad. This will encourage them to do good because they want to
do good and not just because good pays which it does in a society that condemns
people who do wrong and hates them. To do good because it pays means you never
know if a person is really good or not or is just doing good to be liked and
make a good impression for their own sake.
If determinism were as harmful as belief if free will it would still be better
to adopt it instead of the latter just in case we are not free.
It is certainly not any worse. It is actually best.