DOES DE MELLO OVERTHROW JESUS IN HIS BOOK AWARENESS?
The Jesuit Priest from India, Anthony de Mello had a background
in psychotherapy. Many feel that as his spiritual writings
were coloured by it, that he is another example of a man who was
trained in one of its dubious and dangerous forms.
He urges us not to judge or praise ourselves but just to observe what we do
without any element of these intruding (page 46). What about the Bible
doctrine that God's spirit prompts us? What about the
conscience standing for God in you and being put there by him?
He says that depending on others makes you make demands on them (page 54). The
result is fear and fear destroys love. He says we must be detached from them and
let them be free which cures loneliness. We should fear nobody because we are
content to be nobody (page 58).
The system of De Mello is totally incompatible with Roman Catholic doctrine
which is based on the perfection and godhead of Jesus Christ.
De Mello says that Jesus could not do wrong for he had the awareness that the
book tries to inspire in us. It says that because of this Jesus was free and
since we can do wrong we are not free (page 142).
But De Mello’s system forbids aggression and Jesus was aggressive towards the
Jews so Jesus did not practice the philosophy in this book. Jesus taught
everybody to say, “I am a sinner”. But De Mello says that since you should not
say you are depressed but be careful to separate the illness from your
personhood by saying something like, “It is depressed”, meaning your me part is
depressed not the I which would imply that you should not call yourself a sinner
but say “It is a sinner” or “My me part not my I part is a sinner”. Yet the word
sinner means a person or I who sins against God. Jesus also got upset therefore
he did not practice De Mello’s philosophy.
Aggression is accepted by all right thinking people as a duty when you are
trying to get some stubborn person out of a burning house etc. Christianity and
Jesus say there is a Hell of endless torment. Jesus says we must be prepared at
all times for meeting the bridegroom, meaning himself, and no excuse will be
accepted if the opportunity comes. He devised some parables to drive home that
moral. So taking all this into consideration, real Christianity demands quite a
lot of aggression for the fate of Hell which is everlasting torment is worse
than a million deaths. You must yell your head off at a girl who is going to
sleep with her boyfriend.
De Mello cannot answer people who say they enjoy being bad and having negative
feelings. It is possible that people can enjoy hating another person and get
more pleasure out of this than out of letting go which is what De Mello asks
them to do. Everybody and everybody’s situation is different so some people
could hate strongly and be okay.
Also Jesus taught the doctrine of eternal punishment while De Mello says that we
should not worry about the afterlife at all or care about it (page 42). Only the
insane could not care if they go to Hell if they die. He said the central
question in philosophy or the question that should be most important for us is
not is there a God or is there an afterlife but how to do what is best with this
life. De Mello gives lip-service to God and belief in God emphasising that the
more we learn about God the less we know for God is unknowable. But in reality
there is no need for God at all. De Mello said that to need God is to fail to
love God for needing God means you want to control him. We don’t need God to be
happy (page 134). I like the way De Mello is full of the atheist spirit though
it is a pity he has tried to hide it.
If we should not need God, then we must deny that God holds us in existence and
that we cannot exist without him making us.
De Mello with this God we do not need is denying that God comes first. This
contradicts the first great commandment as taught by Jesus and Moses which runs,
“You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart and soul and mind”, in
other words do everything for God and nothing for yourself or others and to love
others and yourself is simply to love God because love is doing whatever is the
right thing to do. Only God is loved in the sense of being valued. This life
does come first in the sense that you have it now and are most sure you are
alive now than that you will be later or after death. De Mello doesn’t give this
reason for it though. He says that you need to strip away the illusions and
become aware and that has to be done in this life so this life comes first.
Jesus had no business teaching that Hell exists when we are not supposed to care
about the afterlife. The doctrine has caused so much upset that we must conclude
that Jesus was an evil man if he lived.
Catholics pray to saints and say prayers like, "Hail Holy Queen, Mother of
Mercy, Hail Our Life, Our Sweetness and our Hope. O Clement, O Loving, O Sweet
Virgin Mary." If you don’t need God you need the saints even less and so it
would be degrading to pray to the saints and more so than it would be to pray to
God.
De Mello’s system seeks to deliver from fear. But some fear is natural. For
example, how can you avoid fearing pain?
The Bible says that God rewards works of righteousness. But if awareness is all
we need what use will they be for we will have all we need? They cannot be
rewards unless they please us. De Mello’s system forbids you to think of rewards
for that is destroying your inner happiness by making yourself need something.
If it is true that success of every kind has nothing to do with self-worth then
it follows that the Bible teaching that you are a failure if you commit adultery
or whatever is wrong for if you succeed in keeping the commandments it is
nothing to be glad about.
The Bible says that grace, a supernatural miracle of God by which he helps you
to be good and pleasing to him, is what changes your life. De Mello says it is
not grace but just seeing through the things that you think offer you happiness
that you need so that you will be free of burdens that stop your happiness. It’s
all your own work so grace and therefore prayer are a waste of time.
The Bible blames original sin and not stupidity for the human condition. If
there is no original sin there should be no infant baptism. De Mello says you do
not need God but awareness which rules out the need for God’s forgiveness and
the sacrament of confession and for Jesus to die for sins. To rule out Jesus’
atonement is to abolish the Mass as well. To abolish grace implies you don’t
need belief in the miracle of God making bread and wine the body and blood of
Christ. The ban on judging ourselves or praising ourselves rules out the
Catholic system entirely.
De Mello’s system if correct proves that the sacraments are actually evils. They
give false hope of becoming a good person. They do not make you develop
awareness for you need De Mello for that. All they do is waste your time and
make you complacent about the evil that is in you for you think they are curing
it magically and they are not. They constitute false promises.
De Mello would agree with the Catholic Church that knowing God is admitting you
don't know. Making God unknowable makes God scary for De Mello states that we
like what we know best for we are familiar with it. De Mello says that there are
only two emotions in us, love and fear and fear is bad and has to be destroyed
by his system for us to be happy. Fear is what originates human evil and it
results from looking for happiness in material things, God, other people and in
love for these things are a distraction from the happiness that is programmed
into us which cannot be taken away or depend on any conditions. By implication
then belief in God is a bad thing. And it is worse when you believe in the Bible
God who would let people go to Hell for all eternity for Hell makes you afraid
for yourself and for others and the fact that Jesus taught the doctrine shows
that De Mello’s system proves that Jesus was a fake who should be ignored.
If fear is the problem then you can be afraid of fear too. The longer you live
the more experience you have of things going wrong and the more afraid you will
get of fear. So it follows that the longer you live the more evil you have
inside you that you disguise as good provided you are not practicing De Mello’s
philosophy.
De Mello says that belief is security. This is because people treat their
beliefs like facts. But he describes faith, personal trust, as insecurity. It is
taking the risk of being wrong and getting on with it. The Bible denies that
faith is insecure. The faith of the Bible is full of confidence that Jesus has
saved the world and is coming back and that God loves all. In 1 Corinthians 15,
Paul stated that Jesus had risen not that Jesus might have risen. 1 Peter 9
tells us that we are sure that our souls will be saved. Faith is a mixture of
belief and acting on the belief so if belief is secure like De Mello says then
it follows that for him faith is just something you do and not necessarily
something that you believe in.
De Mello states that if you believe that nobody loves you there will be moments
when you forget this and during these moments you are happy (page 112). The
doctrine that God comes first urges you to keep God in your mind as much as
possible as if he were your one true love. If you remember that God loves you
that will remind you that people don't so you will lose your happiness over God.
It will only be a little better if it reminds you that there are some or many
who do not.
If De Mello’s philosophy is right then the Bible is not inspired by God at all
for it does not teach his philosophy at all. If it ever does then it is not
clear and detailed enough. We would have something like De Mello’s book at the
beginning of the Bible.