CREATOR IMPOSSIBLE
Creation defined
Nothing is when there isn't anything at all and no possibilities. It is because
there are no possibilities that something cannot appear where there is nothing.
Religion guesses that God can make something where there was nothing before.
There is not something from which all that is has been made. This must be
stressed. The Church denies that God made the universe out of his power but he
used his power to command it to be and it came into being.
We must be careful with the statement that he used his power to cause the
universe. Using your power on nothing to turn it into anything is a
contradiction for there is nothing there to use it on.
The excellent Philosophy of Religion for A Level, OCR Edition (Anne Jordan, Neil
Lockyer and Edwin Tate, Nelson Thornes Ltd, 1999) page 16 while talking about
the creation account in the Bible, puts it as follows: "Prior to the act of
creation there was only God; the 'heavens and the earth' were created out of
nothing (creation ex nihilo). Whatever God commands happens, and on each of the
six days of creation, the different parts of the universe are created...The will
of God was all that is required to create the material universe."
Kant and Hume argued that you were not there to experience how the universe came
to me so you should shrug and say nothing about it.
I would add that this is especially true if all you can come up with is magic!
Catholic teaching
"We believe that God needs no preexistent thing or any help in order to create,
nor is creation any sort of necessary emanation from the divine substance. God
creates freely ‘out of nothing’" (Catechism of the Catholic Church 296).
Note
This webpage should be short but as there is so much confusion in the world on
the subject of creation and the doctrine gets its credibility through being a
trick with words, it is necessary to discuss the different ways the doctrine is
stated. Do not think that because this page is long that it means creation is
hard to refute. It is dead easy.
The Important Points
Keep in your mind the following: Nothing means that which cannot become
something. It cannot become something as it is not something. It is nothing.
Ideas such as, "Nothing comes from nothing unless there is a God to cause
something to come out of nothing" are useless. They contradict the definition of
nothing. If nothing is that which cannot become something for it is its complete
opposite then even a God cannot make any difference.
God is said to have infinite power. But it is also said he does not have the
power to do anything nonsensical or self-contradictory. It does not follow that
if there is a God that he can create. In fact, the existence of the universe
REFUTES AND CONCLUSIVELY DISPROVES the existence of God!
It does not matter if power is infinite or not. You
cannot make something out of nothing.
Summary of the Argument: The teaching about creation can be confusing if you
forget that all it is saying is that all things depend constantly on God's will
to keep them in existence. Without that will there will just be nothing.
Creating means changing nothing into something. But there is nothing there to
change. So what is being said is that creation popped out of nothing. So that is
magic. It is contradictory. If God causes the universe to pop out of nothing then
it can do it by itself. If something can come from nothing with God it can do it
without him. But if it popped out of nothing then God has had nothing to do with
it. He would not be God or supreme. In that sense, creation refutes the very
doctrine of God it is contrived to back up! Whatever the mystery about the
existence of all things is, creation is the worst possible answer. It is worse
than princes being turned into frogs and we consider that absurd and impossible!
Religion says that all things came from nothing. It says that nothing can come
from nothing. It says that God can make things out of nothing. This is saying
that something can come from nothing after all. We have a contradiction!
Something coming from nothing is strange enough. But God making out of nothing
as if it were a material that can be turned into something is worse!
Parmenides many centuries ago stated that out of nothing nothing comes. He was
right. Yet Islam and much of Christianity rose up in defiance of this truth and
to this day they obscure it with their lies.
Conclusion: Creation is absurd. Creation by God is the worst explanation for
the origin of the universe. It is an explanation from magic and therefore not an
explanation at all.
Back to the magic creator God. Magic makes all
things come from nothing not God so you don't need God. God after all uses
magic so it is bigger than him.
Did it come from nothing or not?
To say the universe came from God is to affirm that the universe did not come
from nothing. God commanding the universe to exist and its coming into existence
without him using any power to make it from is not the same as saying the
universe came from God. If I get pregnant the baby comes from me but if I use
magic to put the baby there it does not come from me. See the point? Magic is not
me.
Big Bang?
Why do so many stick to the explanation that the universe
came from or as a result of God's power? Why not some other kind of power?
Science tends to say that there was energy that was close to being nothing and
it turned into something. The universe began when this entity exploded at the
big bang.
Whatever became the universe went through a process of inflation before the big
bang. “Inflation – seems to make not one Big Bang but an infinite number of
them. This is known as eternal inflation.” (Christianity in the Light of
Science).
A cause and effect can be simultaneous. There is no
contradiction in that. The big bang is both cause and effect.
Even if God exists it does not necessarily follow that he can create
If God exists, it does not follow that God necessarily can create or that he is
the creator of the universe.
Some say, "If nothing comes from nothing, then if creation exists it came from
God and did not come from nothing." But many suggest that it could be that the
creation just popped into existence and had nothing to do with God.
God is supposed to be self-sufficient and to have no need to create. There is
then no reason to suppose that he has the power to create. Christians only
assume God can create. They have no understanding of how he could do it or why
he could have the power to do it. They use lofty words to hide the fact that
they don't know what they are talking about!
If God is really self-sufficient he only has the abilities he needs.
Popped into existence?
Suppose it is an extreme absurdity to hold that all things had no cause at all
and just popped into existence. Does God having the power to be the universe's
creator solve the problem? Suppose all things could pop into existence. Then
they can do this whether there is a God or not. So if there is a God and if all
things have come from nothing the believer cannot decide between saying, "God
exists but the creation just popped into existence", and saying, "God exists and
caused the creation." It is simply not true that creation indicates the
existence of a creator. When you assert that it does, you are showing this is
not about God but about you wanting to believe. The argument from creation does
not take you to God even if he exists. It takes you to the God you have made in
your head. The argument of creation in a sense is an argument against God.
Saying there is a God and creation came from nothing is as far as the believers
can go. They should not connect the two necessarily. They have to leave it
there.
God gave no power to make all things. He commanded them to exist. If he gave no
power then creation did pop out of nothing. He gave no power and therefore he
was not its cause. His commanding creation to exist only coincided with it
appearing. It was not a cause in any sense.
Christians say God made all things out of nothing. He is his own power and he
did not make anything out of himself. Their teaching is self-refuting. They are
saying both that he created all things and then they are saying they popped into
existence without him.
The doctrine of creation means that God made nothing turn itself into something.
If nothing can do that then surely it can do it without God?
If a power can turn nothing into something then why can't nothing turn itself
into something? If some power can make 1=100 it is possible for 1=100 without
that power. Why? Because power or not it means 1 can = 100. This is because if
it can't, no power can do anything about it!
God made all things not of his power but by it
What about the idea that God made matter by his power but not of his power?
Creation out of nothing does not mean that God uses his power on nothing to turn
it into something. Nothing can't be turned into anything for it is nothing. God
does not make out of his own power for that is making out of his power and not
out of nothing.
The Christians believe that God made matter out of nothing by just commanding it
to exist. Is this really making matter? No it is calling on magic to make the
matter for you. If God provides no power and makes no input except just ordering
then that is magic. If I order pizza and provide the goods for making it that is
okay. If I order pizza and no goods are provided to make the pizza then my order
will not work. Ordering alone cannot make anything unless power is provided to
fulfil the order. God did not make the universe out of his power or himself or
anything but out of nothing - that is no power. He just commanded it to exist
which means he didn't make it at all.
If God made matter of his power then it did not come from nothing. But his power
can't work on nothing to turn it into something because nothing is nothing.
There is nothing there to work on. You can't make a cake out of ingredients that
don't exist. The power has no material to work on. There is no real power used.
It just drives us back to the idea of God commanding. You can't make a pig fly
when there is no pig. You can't even try. You can only command it. Of course
nothing will happen.
Is nothing from nothing a mere natural law?
Religion says that God is the master of nature and he is not limited to its
rules and laws. They say that nothing comes from nothing is a natural law. So
God can suspend or change this law. He is not bound to it.
It is a natural law but it is also a logical law. To say that something can come
from nothing is to talk nonsense. Nothing and something contradict each other.
Imagine it was a natural law and we had no way of being sure it was a logical
one too. When we are not sure, we are best to assume it is a logical law.
If nothing comes from nothing is just an optional natural law then it follows
that if there is no God it is the law only by chance or luck. But that is as
silly as saying that it is pure luck that means that 2 and 2 make 4.
To say that nothing coming from nothing is a natural law that can be changed by
God is to deny that reason proves that nothing produces nothing. Reason says if
there is absolutely nothing in the universe there will always be absolutely
nothing for there is nothing there for something to come out of. That’s a way of
re-phrasing the point. If nothing can produce something then we don’t need a
God. Reason is no good. If A=A which is the first principle of reason, then to
say something can come from nothing is to say that Nothing can be = to A or vice
versa. It is the abolition of reason.
Objection: You are confusing creating with transforming
This objection is directed at those who think nothing was transformed into
something. Those who say it are only using a figure of speech. There is nothing
there to transform.
The logic is that something can appear where there was nothing at all. But it is
absurd to imagine nothing being transformed into something. There is nothing
there to transform. God's creating the universe means that he brings about the
universe coming into being as in an absolute beginning of existence. It is not a
transition of anything from non-existence into existence/non-being into being.
We are not even saying God commanded things to exist and this command was
transformed into whatever he asked for. There was no power or magic word that
became all things. It did not come from anything.
A thought
G.K. Chesterton once wrote: “It is absurd for the evolutionist to complain that
it is unthinkable for an admittedly unthinkable God to make everything out of
nothing, and then pretend that it is more thinkable that nothing should turn
itself into everything”.
Suppose it is too much to imagine that all things popped into existence from
nothing. But strictly speaking they didn't. A mess appeared from nothing and
became all things.
A seed appearing from nothing doesn't seem as hard to believe. What if that seed
had the power to multiply itself and thus make the vast universe? What if the
seed appeared from nothing but the rest did not?
EXISTENCE CANNOT EMERGE FROM NOTHING FOR THERE IS NOTHING THERE
Read more: http://www.reasonablefaith.org/creation-providence-and-miracle#ixzz3YcRu1Tjd