IF GOD DOES NOT CORRUPT THEN BELIEF IN GOD CORRUPTS
God represents the view that you must trust he exists and what he allegedly
reveals. This goes with him being the only origin of all things and being honest
and perfectly loving. He has countless secrets and secrets are a danger to
truth. The argument then that we do not know all truth so we can believe that a
revelation is from God is invalid. There are more likely to be false revelations
than true ones. Man is more likely to pretend that God has said x y and z than
God is to really reveal.
Most followers of God if not all are only pleasing God because it pleases them.
It would be a stupid god who would be happy with that! The doctrine that all are
sinners hints at how people tend to use God or their idea of God to serve
themselves. So no loving God would give revelation through man or hearsay. No
loving God would send his son to talk to us directly and then leave us having to
go to men to learn what he talked about.
Deism assumes that God creates all things but is uncaring and thus does not
communicate. But what if he does? If he does, then he could truly have founded
say Christianity though it is a pack of lies. Even if a revelation comes from a
higher power it does not mean it is really telling us the truth. It could still
be untrue.
Arguments just from authority are useless and the worst of all. Nobody uses them
in good faith. To say that concentration camps are good because Hitler says so
is not different in kind from saying that dairy is bad for you for some teacher
says so. The content and the consequences differ but both are equally deference
to authority. You cannot say it is irrational to listen to Hitler if you are
listening to some authority too be it benign or sinister or stupid. The argument
from authority is about power and manipulation. In its worst form, it is men
pointing to God as authority rather than themselves. And of course they are the
ones telling you what God wants!
If there is no God then the authority of clergy, popes, prophets, religious
terrorist leaders and Messiahs is illegitimate. They do not have the authority
to give you God's word or to channel God's blessings to you and give you orders
in the name of religion. They do not have the authority to sell you books and
services and to take your stipends.
It is interesting that God's word is revealed practically speaking to clerics.
Messiahs and prophets are clerics in their own way. The people have to go to the
clerics for them to discern what God has revealed.
Man tells you what to think of God. You take man's word for it that he really
got revelations from God. Man always judges morals and doctrines to see if they
came from God. Religion is human opinion pretending it is not. It pretends to be
God's work. In that sense, God is what man wants to think he is.
In 1973, a Stanford University experiment showed how moral people soon
abandon the morals when they are given power and authority. Religions leaders
get spiritual power and influence and will lie and hurt people to protect this
power. That is why you can show a theologian his core teaching is wrong and he
will seem immune to the truth. He will not change for he is lying to himself.
Man says God revealed himself to man. Man must be wiser than God when man is
able to decide if God is talking to him and if others are able to decide the man
is right. There is no real humility in a prophet no matter how well humility is
simulated. If you want power over people and the feeling of power, there is no
greater ego buzz than getting people to think you are God's spokesperson. The
atheist does not think that God sent him and the believer does. Such arrogance!
Nothing needs divine inspiration unless it is a mistake or it is a lie or unless
it wishes to force or pressure you to believe. You are expected to accept
doctrines not because they are believable but because God says so. True respect
for you means you will be given the tools to decide for yourself.
We have only a prophet’s word for it that God revealed to him or her what he
or she says. The whole thing rests on faith in the prophet. That is bad enough
when it without evidence, but worse when it is against all the evidence which is
available. And religion makes the prophet untestable for it says that sometimes
outlandish testimonies can be true and this is the testimony of God. Nobody can
ever prove that a prophet did not in fact hear something that claimed to be the
voice of God. Religion takes advantage of that fact too. It even argues that God
is in a position to give commands that seem harsh and mad for he alone knows why
they are needed.
Religion tells people that if its members and leaders let you down then not to
give up for the religion is about God and not them. Now you know that is not
true! A man-made religion would say that anyway. It is horrendous how the
Catholic Church in particular manipulated people to keep using the Church for
sacraments and worship and give it money in the wake of the universal clerical
sex abuse cover-up in the Church. It told them the Church is about God. If the
Church is man-made then the Church was fooling those people. If they intended to
worship God, they failed. They worshipped God as created by man.
God and religion are simply masks. Man cannot claim to be God so man does the
next best thing - claim to be inspired to speak for God. Though we are not to
condemn something just because it can be abused, we can condemn religion for the
harm it has done because religion is an abuse. Let me explain.
Hearing a voice does not mean it is God’s and only God can know if he is really
speaking. Even the person who hears cannot be sure but can only guess. If anyone
claims to be hearing the voice of God and giving his message to others he is a
liar. To think that you don’t know where the voice comes from means it is not
from you is arrogant. It is, “I don’t know where this inspiration comes from so
it comes from God.” It makes no sense. By spreading your message you inspire a
worse arrogance in others. X has a voice in his heart or head and doesn’t know
where it comes from therefore it is from God. The more your faith in a prophet
is based on hearsay the worse the problem gets.
In the light of man's involvement in alleged communications from God - they are
only ever alleged - it is man who tries to come up with explanations for God
allowing evil. It is man's word we take for it. That is so repulsive and is
repulsive because of the magnitude of human suffering.
God supposedly asks for us to be virtuous. A being that asks for virtue from us
is not necessarily virtuous itself. It may not be a good being. Believers forget
that if God is not violent he might still be bad. It may be that violence is not
his thing and his tricking you to have a relationship with him based on lies
about what he is really like is his thing. Are believers guilty of believing God
too easily? Yes. That impacts on believing what man says about God. The word of
a God who may not be trustworthy is a problem and if he speaks to man it should
make you trust the message even less. So being a revelation does not make it
right to believe it. Also, if the message does not come from God but from some
other power it follows that something being a revelation does not make it
reliable.
The Bible says in 1 Corinthians 14, "Now, brothers and sisters, if I come to you
and speak in tongues, what good will I be to you, unless I bring you some
revelation or knowledge or prophecy or word of instruction? Even in the case of
lifeless things that make sounds, such as the pipe or harp, how will anyone know
what tune is being played unless there is a distinction in the notes? Again, if
the trumpet does not sound a clear call, who will get ready for battle? So it is
with you. Unless you speak intelligible words with your tongue, how will anyone
know what you are saying? You will just be speaking into the air." Yet why is
all claimed divine revelation so hard to interpret and engage so much
controversy and even bitter division that leads to blood being spilled? Because
an unclear revelation is a human scam and not a revelation never mind a divine
revelation. Simple.
1 Thessalonians 2:13 says that the word of the apostles is really the word of
God and is not to be accepted as a human message. This is pretty clear that
liberal Christians who water down the Bible's teaching into something vague and
open to too wide of an interpretation are frauds.
If absolute freedom corrupts even the best then we can be sure that those who
claim to tell others what God says and thus declare their word reliable as if
they were God are being exploitative. It will get worse. They get into the most
private thing that many people claim to have an inner spiritual life. It is
about the ego of the preacher. They see how bad things can happen after prayer
so they will surely try to use prayer to kill and maim their enemies.