CONTROL BELIEFS IN THE LIGHT OF MORALITY
A control belief controls and co-ordinates how you look at the evidence and how
you interpret it.
Believers in moral code always start with what they want it to be and then they
interpret the evidence to fit their belief.
A control belief can be conscious or unconscious. You may not be aware of how
you treat something as probably true.
To avoid and minimise the damage and risks of control beliefs you need to know
what the default beliefs are.
Take morality.
Is human nature moral? Is it hypocritical which is a kind of homage to moral? Is
it immoral? Is it amoral?
The default position is to assume that human nature is hypocritical. Just
because you feel sincere does not mean you are sincere. The hypocrite Jesus
condemned in Luke 16 felt he was sincere and Jesus said the feeling mattered not
one iota. God was angry with the hypocrite.
The fact that priests and nuns are looked up to as moral though they honour a
book replete with the fanaticism and violence commanded by God as the word of
God shows the power of hypocrisy. They are so used to tricking people into
honouring a God who commanded murder that they think nothing of it.
"Liberal" Christians pick and choose out of the Bible what they want to believe
which is usually the nice and saccharine stuff. Why should anybody pick what
they pick? What not take the nastier bits as inspirational? Most people believe
the world is red in tooth and claw and you have to be ruthless to survive. They
think morality and life can be nasty business so religion can be nasty business
too. They would be happy to be edified by the Bible tales of this blood-drinking
God who commands murder and genocide. The liberals have no right to criticise
those who do that. They indirectly give them permission and encouragement to do
so though they would prefer to forget that. They cannot say that Christian
terrorists for example are not representative of the Christian religion. The
Bible advocates religious violence so they are representative.
Liberal Christianity is just a heap of man-made religions. Each group has its
own views. It is a form of fundamentalism and idolatry to be part of a religion
like that. Idolatry is a form of fundamentalism and fundamentalism is a form of
idolatry. God believers say it is awful to adore as God what is not God at all.
But what about themselves? If there is no God they are mistaking nature and
their own imagination for God! Idolatry can be condemned by the atheist too!
Fundamentalists don't have impressive evidence for their cocksure creed being
true. Liberals have even less and so are really no better. Their system makes no
sense because they end up making very big claims on slender evidence. For
example, they might say that the virgin birth is just a metaphor for Jesus
having been sent by God as the supreme teacher. But because they don't take too
much of the Bible that seriously they end up with the same attitude as the
fundamentalists which is that reason and science must be sacrificed in the
interest of faith. Liberals are just fundamentalists with more popular and
fashionable beliefs.
The God concept is inseparable from fundamentalism. It is always fundamentalist
to believe in God or to say he exists. If God exists he deserves to be put
first. The only way we can be sure we are doing that is by doing good at great
sacrifice and personal suffering for all eternity. If God asked you to suffer
forever for others and in love would you do it? The answer is no.
Belief in God makes you less moral not more.
There is enough to disagree about and to give people an excuse to argue and
discriminate against people about without religion. This includes liberal
religion. It causes division and trouble we could do without. Liberals may still
say things like, "Jesus showed us what God was like," and "God is love and he
loves us all". Fundamentalists will feel their own fundamentalist and extremist
faith assisted by such teachings. They will feel, "Even liberal scholars agree
with me that much so I can be totally confident my faith is true."
We want happiness for its own sake. It is an end in itself. We will do what
helps us all to be happy together. We don't need to believe in God for any of
that. God is irrelevant. It is not God we want but happiness. Christians admit
this and stop lying to yourself and to us.
There has never existed a person who put say money before all things. No - that
person thought money would buy happiness so it is the happiness he wanted.
Finally, we need our defaults. We only want other beliefs. That is why control
belief mechanisms are inherently oppressive.