Compensation culture in a secular context
Compensation claims should be calculated on the basis of how long a person is
likely to live in pain and how much money it would take to buy happiness to make
up for the pain. One can get money and go on holidays with it and still be
unable to have a good time. So the decision has to be based on theory. The
question must be asked, how much money would this person need to be reasonably
happy?
Small offences should be ignored by the law. It is silly to sue a person for
giving you a push that should not have made you fall or for saying you are
boring. It is unjust to go any further with it for a telling off would suffice.
The state must not pay compensation for crimes committed by the Church
If the Church commits crimes the Church must pay the compensation itself. These
crimes have nothing to do with taxpayers.
All teachings that faith comes before people, whether these teachings are
explicit or the even more dangerous implicit, must be recognised as leading to a
culture where the state will steal the taxpayers money to pay for the crimes of
the Church.
Doctrines such as,
our Church brings people to the only saviour from sin
our Church is the only true Church
Such doctrines imply that it is better to pay money to these setups than to help
the poor. The religion denying this is hot air and insincere. The believers do
however admit that if there is a choice between saving a person from sin or
giving them money that the first is better.