"CHRIST IS GOD" TORN APART
The Christian Church claims it is rational to believe that Jesus Christ though a
true man was also truly God. The worship that is due to God is due to Jesus.
Most scholars and researchers in the world disagree with Christianity in this
thing. Who is right?
The Roman Catholic Augustine Publishing Company re-published in 1987, the book
by the Rev J. P. Arendzen, D.D. called, Christ is God. Its purpose was to defend
belief in the Roman Catholic doctrine that Jesus Christ is God. The book is
excellent and is a must. But as excellent as it is it is seriously flawed.
The first chapter explores the biblical evidence for Jesus being divine. On
pages 1 and 2 we are given four reasons why any reasonable person could
subscribe to the Catholic doctrine of Jesus if Jesus claimed to be God.
The first is that Jesus was perfect morally and so his claim to be divine must
be true. But Jesus was written about by people who had no real respect for or
grasp of the true right and wrong. So this proves nothing for if he was good
that made him an easy target to turn into a God. The pagans deified good men all
the time. Worse for the Christians, Jesus did do wrong – all of the time in fact
though it may not always have looked wrong. Jesus might have been sinless but
that is no guarantee that Jesus was infallible. He might have been wrong about
being God. To use the argument is to say, “Jesus fits my ideas of good and bad
so he was good.” But people disagree on moral matters. Some see the pope as good
for opposing birth control and others see him as eccentric and others see him as
just bad. What believers in the argument are saying is that, “We are so proud of
ourselves that Jesus matches our virtues and idea of it. It is more about our
pride than about Jesus.”
The second reason for believing Jesus’ claim to divinity was his miracles. But
when Jesus regarded the miracles of a horrid fraud like Moses as divine that
does not fare well for his own. He performed them to back up the wily and vile
Moses too and him even more than himself for he said that Moses gave evidence
that the saviour and Son of God would come and was on about him. Jesus was
solidly based on the work of Moses and the scriptures of Moses and those that
followed were his foundation. Jesus did miracles to verify the foundation or to
draw attention to its validity so that it could validate him.
The third reason is that since Jesus’ message was so true and right he had to be
trustworthy so if he had said he was God then that is who he was. But maybe he
was just clever. The professional fraud uses the truth to support himself.
Arindzen is only able to boast about Jesus’ immaculate integrity because he
refuses to see the lies Jesus told. He gives no evidence that the gospellers
were not unduly biased or that those who charged Jesus with being untruthful
were wrong. Few agree on how to interpret Jesus’ moral teaching so it is zany to
put down his wisdom as a credential.
The fourth reason is astonishing. It is that the Catholic Church is so holy that
it would be impossible for it to have been founded on the lie that Jesus was
God. But if God exists then sincerity not truth makes you holy. The Catholic
Church has always said that it notices that error can produce holiness. The
holiness of the Catholic, Orthodox and Protestant Churches is superficial and
hypocritical for they say that a sinner can do good works for God. But to adhere
to sin and then to do good instead of repenting first is to insult God and to
try and flatter him. You never can tell if anybody is really holy.
Page 4 admits what we already know that there is no direct and categorical
statement in the gospels made by Jesus that he is God incarnate. He never says,
“I am the Lord God.”
The explanation for this the author gives is that Jesus was not on earth to get
adored as God but to atone for sinners and to show us a good example of human
living. He wanted to wait to be called God and adored after the resurrection.
Now, atoning for sins did not mean he could not publicise his divinity.
And if Jesus hid his divinity to give us good example, then the priest
contradicts his own assertion that Jesus revealed his deity while on earth in an
indirect way and he says that when Jesus claimed to be the I AM, God’s name, he
was directly claiming to be God. If Jesus claimed to be God once he could have
done it more often. If Jesus claimed to be God at all he would have been
tortured by demands to prove it. The people would have been obsessed with it. We
would be reading about his disputes with them in the gospels about it a lot
more. There is no way a gospeller would not stress that Jesus was God if that
was what he believed. The gospellers would present the post-resurrection Jesus
as saying he was divine if he had.
Let us assume as Christians do that Jesus being God doesn’t detract from the
reality of his temptations to sin. Then Jesus’ good example could be seen
without him hiding his godhead for it would be God showing us what to do and
telling us we can do it. So nobody can say a man known to be God incarnate would
not serve as a good example for us on the grounds that it is easy for God to be
perfect.
But the truth is that whether he hides his divinity or not, if Jesus is God,
then his temptations were not real for he couldn’t sin for God cannot change and
is perfectly good and so will never sin. Jesus’ struggle with sin wouldn’t be a
real struggle for he can’t sin. And the people had plenty of other good examples
meaning that if they did not see Jesus as an example it did not matter. But they
would have seen right and wrong from him. They had to. And if Jesus revealing
his deity would ruin the example then he would have to hide it even after the
resurrection. Also Jesus would have to scrupulously avoid any act that looked
bad even if it was not. But in the gospels he is rude and insults people and
attacked a poor mother with racist abuse. He cursed the fig tree though it was
not its fault that it didn’t have any figs on it for it was not the season.
Jesus then did not hide his divinity because he wanted to be an example and
atone for sinners. He hid his divinity for he never claimed to be God.
The author argues that since Jesus said he would tell sinners to depart from him
on the day of judgment and that he was telling them how to live in the Sermon on
the Mount that he must have been God. But God could have given his non-divine
son the authority to command. Moses gave orders on divine authority without
being God.
When Jesus healed he demanded faith in himself that he could do it first. The
priest argues that if Jesus were not God, it would not be Jesus doing the
miracles but God doing them through him. But to believe that a man can do
miracles is to believe that God can do them through him. This fails to prove
that Jesus was God.
When the Jews expressed their conviction that nobody could forgive sins but God
Jesus did not answer them, did not tell them they were wrong, but worked a
miracle to prove that he could forgive sins and then told a man that his sins
were forgiven. The priest says that this indicated that Jesus is God. But Jesus
told them he wanted them to know that he had the authority to do this which
could be taken to mean that God does not reserve the power to forgive to himself
alone in which case Jesus would not be God. To forgive is to stop treating a
person as an offender. Jesus could have claimed to use the power to do this on
God’s behalf like Catholic priests do.
When Jesus claimed at his trial that he was destined for the right hand of God
and was the Son of God the Jews accused him of blasphemy. It is argued that
Jesus meant the term Son of God in the Trinitarian sense for there was no
blasphemy in the Jewish understanding of what he called himself. Wrong. If Jesus
were a sinner it would be blasphemy to make such claims even under the Jewish
understanding of the Son of God which had no trace of divinity in it. If it is
not blasphemy to call yourself the Son of God it is when you are clearly not the
Son of God. You would be calling God unholy.
Why should we listen to people who say Jesus was God when most scholars
including Professor Denis Nineham hold that the New Testament does not even say
that (Priestland’s Progress, page 40). Even those scholars who consider Jesus to
be God deny that he knew he was God or claimed to be God when he was alive (page
125, The Metaphor of God Incarnate). They even deny that the I AM references
mean he claimed to be God (page 28, ibid).
The book cannot convince anybody that Jesus was God.
BOOKS CONSULTED
A CALL TO HERESY, Robert Van de Weyer, Lamp Press, London, 1989
ALLEGED DISCREPANCIES OF THE BIBLE, John W Haley, Whitaker House, Pennsylvania,
undated
ASKING THEM QUESTIONS, Various, Oxford University Press, London, 1936
CHRIST IS GOD, Rev JP Arendzen DD, Augustine Publishing Company, Devon, 1987
CHRIST OUR LIGHT, J Buys SJ Geoffrey Chapman and Gill & Son, London-Melbourne,
Dublin 1966
CHRISTIANITY FOR THE TOUGH-MINDED Ed John Warwick Montgomery, Bethany Fellowship
Inc, Minneapolis, 1973
DID JESUS CHRIST REALLY COME DOWN FROM HEAVEN? Alan Hayward, Christadelphian
ALS, Birmingham
DO CHRISTIANS BELIEVE IN THREE GODS? Radio Bible Class, Grand Rapids, Michigan,
1992
EVIDENCE THAT DEMANDS A VERDICT, Vol 1, Josh McDowell, Alpha, Scripture Press
Foundation, Bucks, 1995
FOUR GREAT HERESIES, John R Rice, Sword of the Lord, Murfreesboro, Tennessee,
1975
GOD AND THE HUMAN CONDITION, F J Sheed, Sheed & Ward, London 1967
HANDBOOK OF CHRISTIAN APOLOGETICS, Peter Kreeft & Ronald Tacelli, Monarch, East
Sussex, 1994
HERESIES AND HOW TO AVOID THEM, Editors Ben Quash and Michael Ward, SPCK,
London, 2007
HONEST TO GOD, John AT Robinson, SCM Press, London, 1963
JEHOVAH’S WITNESSES John Wijngaards, Catholic Truth Society, London, 1998
JESUS GOD THE SON OR SON OF GOD? Fred Pearce Christadelphian Publishing Office,
Birmingham
MERE CHRISTIANITY, CS Lewis, Fontana, Glasgow, 1975
MIRACLES, CS Lewis, Fontana, London, 1960
PRIESTLAND’S PROGRESS, Gerald Priestland, BBC, London, 1981
SCIENCE AND THE BIBLE, Henry Morris, Moody Press, Bucks, 1988
SET MY EXILES FREE, John Power, Logos Books, MH Gill & Son Ltd, Dublin, 1967
SOME MODERN FAITHS, Maurice C Burrell and J Stafford Wright, Intervarsity Press,
Leicestershire, 1988
THE CASE FOR CHRIST, Lee Strobel, HarperCollins and Zondervan, Michigan, 1998
THE EARLY CHURCH, Henry Chadwick, Pelican, Middlesex, 1987
THE GODHEAD EXPLAINED, Christadelphian Press, Beverley, South Australia
THE METAPHOR OF GOD INCARNATE, John Hick, SCM Press, London, 1993
THE MYTH OF GOD INCARNATE, John Hick ed., SCM Press, London, 1977
THE NEW CULTS, Walter Martin, Vision House, Santa Ana, California, 1980
THE SPIRIT OF GOD, John Bedson, Lightstand Burbank CA 1984
THE UNAUTHORISED VERSION, Robin Lane Fox, Penguin Books, Middlesex, 1992
UNDERSTANDING THE CULTS, Josh McDowell and Don Stewart, Campus Crusade for
Christ, San Bernardino, 1983
UNITARIAN CHRISTIANITY AND OTHER ESSAYS, William Ellery Channing, The
Bobs-Merrill Company Inc, Kansas, 1957
YOU CAN LIVE FOREVER IN PARADISE ON EARTH, Watchtower Bible and Tract Society,
New York, 1982
THE WWW
http://www.kevinquick.com/kkministries/books/reasoning/nwt.html,
Kevin Quick discusses the Jehovah’s Witnesses claim that the Bible never says
that Jesus is God
www.easyspace.com
Gives the Jehovah’s Witness response to this site
www.gospelassemblyfree.com/facts/fathersonwayne.htm
Father and/or Son by H Wayne Hamburger