DID THE EARLY CHRISTIANS MURDER IN OBEDIENCE TO GOD?
The early Christians are praised for being non-violent which is strange
considering how they took the Old and New Testaments seriously as the word of
God despite the pages being plastered with genocide and murder endorsed by God
explicitly.
Matthew 5:21 has Jesus referring to the teaching of God that murder is forbidden and that whoever murders must be subjected to judgment. By judgment he means capital punishment. Jesus goes on to say the Sanhedrin should have the right to administer such physical punishment to those who call their brother a fool. The Sanhedrin is declared then to have the right to do what it does which implies support for its claim that it has the divine right to decree executions by stoning.
Acts 10 has a serving military man baptised into the faith. It reads, At Caesarea there was a man named Cornelius, a centurion in what was known as the Italian Regiment. He and all his family were devout and God-fearing; he gave generously to those in need and prayed to God regularly.
This man simply had to have persecuted those who opposed the divine Roman
Emperor and the gods.
Did the early Christians carry out, or at least wish they could commit, the
murders and mutilations that were commanded in the Law of Moses? For people of
the Roman Empire to support a religion that would not sanction fighting
believing the end of Rome and the world was nigh would mean certain death for it
was high treason. Either the Church was bribing Rome to let it have its freedom
or the Church did believe in killing which was why it escaped and Paul had the
freedom to preach.
The Bible gives no hint that the laws of God commanding the killing of murderers, homosexuals and adulterers etc in the Old Testament were temporary civil laws. It does not say they were only state laws. If they are moral laws then they are still valid for today's Christians.
Read what Peter, Jesus' apostle said in the Acts of the Apostles. The context is
how Jesus was supposedly murdered as a result of Jewish scheming. "Now, fellow
Israelites, I know that you acted in ignorance, as did your leaders. But this is
how God fulfilled what he had foretold through all the prophets, saying that his
Messiah would suffer. Repent, then, and turn to God, so that your sins may be
wiped out, that times of refreshing may come from the Lord, and that he may send
the Messiah, who has been appointed for you—even Jesus. Heaven must receive him
until the time comes for God to restore everything, as he promised long ago
through his holy prophets. For Moses said, ‘The Lord your God will raise up for
you a prophet like me from among your own people; you must listen to everything
he tells you. Anyone who does not listen to him will be completely cut off from
their people.’" Peter adds the command about being cut off to that text. In the
Law, it does not appear beside that command but it does appear in relation to
other subjects such as sabbath breakers. Cutting off appears in the Law of Moses
which apparently refers to somebody being thrown out of the community and left
to die in the wilderness. Most authorities regard it as referring to direct
execution. Peter refers to a complete cut off which is clearly a euphemism for
murdering them. Peter is endorsing Moses as commanding that those who turn to
Jesus and then away from him must be executed. The method would have usually
being stoning. Jesus referred to that verse about the prophet too. Peter by
saying Moses and Jesus are both to be obeyed totally is indicating that both
want rebel Christians put to death. He does not say it can be done but that it
must be aimed for and done when possible. No sect ever claims it can just go out
and execute as if the government was not there.
Sometimes Gehenna in the Bible is a figure of Hell and other times it means what
the Jews meant by it. Gehenna is the valley of Hinnom. South of Jerusalem it was
a smoking, worm-infested dump for the corpses of criminals. Jesus claimed that
people who sinned gravely belonged there, “I say to you…whoever says, You cursed
fool! [You empty-headed idiot!] shall be liable to and unable to escape the hell
(Gehenna) of fire” (Matthew 5:22, Amplified Bible). He approved of killing them
and dumping their bodies for he gave no hint that he didn’t mean it literally or
was referring to the perpetual torment of Hell and not to Gehenna the dump
outside the city of Jerusalem. Despite some translations of the scriptures the
Geena shouldn’t always be translated hell but Gehenna. Unwarranted
interpretations of Jesus’ words is putting human opinions over God. If we
respect God’s word we will have to accept that Jesus didn’t mean Hell when he
said Gehenna here. Jesus hadn’t revealed or hinted about Hell yet so this was
the real Gehenna. You can avoid Hell by repentance but you cannot avoid Gehenna
if the law of the land sends you there and Jesus stressed that there was no
escape. The Law of Moses did not go that far so Jesus was saying that those who
use that insult must be executed and dumped there. This was in the middle of the
Sermon on the Mount!
The Church started off as Jewish Christianity. The Church was made up of
Christians who lived as Jews and observed the Jewish rite of circumcision and
the Law for years. The Church was brought to the brink of schism when it decided
that non-Jews who wanted to enter the Church did not have to keep the whole Law.
In Acts 21:20, 21 we read that James the apostle and his presbyters said, “You
see, brother [Paul], how many thousands of believers there are among the Jews,
and all of them are enthusiastic upholders of the [Mosiac] Law. Now they have
been informed about you that you continually teach that all the Jews who live
among the Gentiles to turn back from and forsake Moses, advising them not to
circumcise their children or pay any attention to the observance of the [Mosiac]
customs.” Christians who were thirsting for the blood of apostates and gays and
adulterers were welcomed into the Christian fold. This shows that the Church
approved of them. The Church did not make one moral code for Jewish believers
and another for non-Jews (Acts 10:34) so all were expected to be willing to kill
whoever the Law decreed should be dead. But there is more. Paul was asked to
prove that he was not an opponent of the Jewish Law by undertaking some
ceremonies and he did that (Acts 21:24-26). Paul was tried before the Sanhedrin
and found not guilty of teaching that the Law was abolished for Jews (Acts
23:9,29).
Christianity still holds that the Bible’s stoning laws are just and perfect (1
Timothy 1:8). No decent person would mentally submit to such an evaluation. It
is scary that nice people could have another side thanks to Moses and Jesus
Christ. Anybody who says that the laws are not Christian and to be abhorred and
who claims to be a Christian is a fraud. Once you repudiate the Bible you are
repudiating the authority of Jesus and putting your own opinion in his place.
Liberal Christianity is simply not Christianity.
In the Bible, there are allusions to murders commanded by Christians. The early
Church warned that all who didn’t submit to her Jesus and her would be destroyed
(2 Peter 2:12). No maybes here therefore this is a vow to murder them if
possible.
Many Christians still believe in capital punishment because of the Bible. Some
who don’t understand their religion don’t. Some claim to believe in the Bible
and refuse to accept capital punishment – they are those who only want religion
the way they want it to be. The Catechism of the Catholic Church shows that
capital punishment is still endorsed by the Catholic Church. If the New
Testament never mentions capital punishment as many say and they still believe
in it then they have no authority to disprove of the legal killing of gays and
apostates. They cannot sincerely condemn illegally killing them for God’s law
comes first and they approve of the apostles preaching the gospel and nearly
getting themselves killed – when a Christian says that it is okay to break the
law of the land against suicide and fanaticism to preach the gospel in dangerous
places how can they forbid murdering or beating up somebody because the Bible
says so and in spite of the civil illegality. The Christian and War by Robert
Moyer says that God never abrogated capital punishment (page 7). When it was not
abrogated it was kept it in force. This tells us that capital punishment for
kidnappers, adulterers and homosexuals and apostates must still be obligatory or
else God will lash out at us.
The Catholics and most of the Protestant cults believed in Moses’ laws for
centuries and embarked on a long career of large-scale torture and butchery. The
high-levels know that our arguments are right for they got them first. Bible
Christianity is dangerous.
We justly accuse all those who prove of the murdering commanded in the Bible of
approving of human sacrifice for any needless killing done in God’s name is a
human sacrifice no matter what else it is called. They say there is a purpose?
If there is, then why punish anybody who says that the Holy Spirit told them
that they committed their crime for a mysterious divine purpose. This
incomprehensible purpose crap is just a dose of bigotry mingled with whitewash.
It is unchristian to let anybody who God wants dead live.
God kills so God can permit people to kill for him. When God, who alone matters,
in Christian theology lives then you should die for God if you have meaning that
then capital punishment cannot be wrong full stop.
The Bible should be banned and burned to keep it away from the ignorant public
because of its barbaric and sanguinary statutes and inciting people to acts of
cruelty. Acts of depravity and murder still happen on account of the Bible’s
teachings. But we can be sure that the state won’t do anything about this for it
is smitten with some of the delights of Christian injustice and ill nature and
is often tricked by the clergy into believing that the more religion there is
the less crime.
The Empire had no bother getting new soldiers and the Christians were in a
minority and so it was only natural that not many of them would have been in the
army. The early Christians who were in the army up to 167 AD were unlikely to
have got involved in warfare for the army was just used to supervise the
boundaries of the Empire and so there was very little warfare (page 16, The
Christian and War - Norris). This gave the illusion that Christians did not
fight. At Militene it is known that not all the soldiers who joined Christianity
left the army. Christian soldiers fought by the River Danube under the emperor
Marcus Aurelius. Justin Martyr wrote that Christians ceased to hate and make war
with their enemies. But that is not saying that war was wrong in itself even
when you were the innocent party. Some say it does ignoring the fact that
nothing should be used as evidence when you don’t know the reason for it. The
Christians were more interested in making converts than getting tied up in
waging war. The Egyptian Church Order and the Hippolytean Canons and the
Testament of Our Lord forbade soldiers to kill even when they were legally
commanded to. But the Torah only allowed killing for the sake of God. These
soldiers would have been killing for a pagan state. Although Christians were to
support the state they were not to go that far. The rules do not prove that
Christians were totally against killing. There were a few Christians who came
out against killing full stop but there had been dissenters from the beginning.
The early Christians kept to themselves and out of state affairs and kept out of
the army because of the pressure to practice idolatry so their reluctance to get
involved in public life does not prove that they believed in strict pacifism
(page 211, The Jesus Event).
The New Testament never once changed the Law of Moses so when it calls Christ
Lord which is the same as lawgiver who must be obeyed (Acts 2:36; Matthew 28:18
and James 4:12) commonsense says that the law of Christ and the Law of Moses are
one and the same.
God writing with Paul in Romans 13:5 says that the judges and rulers of the
state represent God and they alone have God’s authority to carry out executions.
But in areas where there were no rulers set up or where anarchy prevailed the
Christians could presumably carry it out themselves. Paul wants his followers if
they want to kill to persuade the government to let them but not to plan the
downfall of the government by any illegitimate means. One thing is for sure, if
a Christian kills an adulterer or homosexual the true Christian cannot condemn
her or him for this killing but only for the illegality of the killing. Thus the
person would be entitled to a small penalty than the penalty for death. A
Christian book, Kennedy’s Murder, admits that killing Lee Harvey Oswald for
killing Kennedy was not wrong by itself but only the fact that it was illegal
brought in the wrongness (page 4). One thing is for sure when the Bible commands
that when two men are caught together the people have to purge this evil from
their midst it means that if we cannot kill them we have to take their jobs
homes and rights from them. Anybody who does not purge is declared to be
disobedient and in danger themselves for the Law ends with a heap of threats of
divine retribution against anybody who disobeys it.
The First Epistle of John says it does not
advise praying for those who sin unto death. Is that referring
to those who sinned unto death according to the Law of Moses such as
adulteresses and those who adored false Gods? They were not
forgiven but stoned to death by divine command. Today
Christians say that such sin still deserves death but God instead of
asking us to execute them does it himself.