The bigger the miracle claim the bigger and better the evidence for it needs to be!
A miracle is what is not naturally possible. It is a supernatural occurrence. It
is paranormal.
Miracles are acts contrary to the usual workings of
natural law or acts according to some definitions that are natural but beyond
our understanding of nature. In other words, an event like blood coming from the
eyes of a statue without trickery would be a miracle or a statue coming to life.
The Church says God is all-powerful and he does miracles
so that we might learn his message directly or indirectly from them. They are
for teaching the truth and promoting it.
The person who says they got a revelation from God that
the world is to end next week and the person seeing the Blessed Virgin and
getting a harmless message to repent from her, demand the same level of
evidence. Why? Doesn’t the first person have a more important message than the
second? Yes the content is more serious but that is not the point. The method by
which both messages came is equal in that it is supernatural. The two messages
equally need to be proved reliable and supernatural because they claim to be
supernatural. The point is not the importance of the messages but the medium of
the message – that is, how the message was given. The content messages can have
no importance at all unless the supernatural nature of the message can be proven
and the supernatural can be proven reliable. Think of it this way, we can’t
listen to the world end message or the other one just because of what it says.
The supernatural has to be proven to exist and be reliable before we can heed
such a message. Therefore small miracles need to be treated as scientifically or
sceptically as big ones.
If 1 plus 1 is 3 in a village in Spain that calls for as much attention and
examination as 1 plus 1 being 3 in the whole of Europe would be. A miracle
challenges the way things happen in the same way that that would challenge
mathematics. For example, if 1 + 1 = 3 is true anywhere it is true everywhere.
It’s a universal law. If somebody can instantly cure the incurable that means
the diseases cured are no longer incurable and this becomes a universal law too.
Imagine that when two natural laws are brought together they result in a
specific result that we will call result X. You could say that law 1 plus law 2
is equal to result X. If a miracle interferes with this then the two laws bring
about a different result. It’s the same scenario as 1 and 1 = 2 being changed to
1 and 1 = 3. Believers say that this is wrong. It is law 1 plus law 2 plus miracle
law 3 = a different result from X.
It’s a matter of worldwide concern when a miracle takes place – though the world
wouldn’t be concerned it ought to be. The view that the bigger the miracle the
greater the evidence is a mistake. True, you need almost unattainable evidence
for a big miracle for it is big but you are no better off with smaller ones. Why?
The manifestation may differ but the nature of the event is the same, it defies
what we know of nature. This evidence is so difficult and time-consuming to
verify that clearly all believers in miracles are inferring that evidence isn’t
so important and if so, then we should believe crackpots who claim revelations
about the end of the world!
Further Reading ~
A Christian Faith for Today, W Montgomery Watt, Routledge, London, 2002
Answers to Tough Questions, Josh McDowell and Don Stewart, Scripture Press,
Bucks, 1980
Apparitions, Healings and Weeping Madonnas, Lisa J Schwebel, Paulist Press, New
York, 2004
A Summary of Christian Doctrine, Louis Berkhof, The Banner of Truth Trust,
London, 1971
Catechism of the Catholic Church, Veritas, Dublin, 1995
Catholicism and Fundamentalism, Karl Keating, Ignatius Press, San Francisco,
1988
Enchiridion Symbolorum Et Definitionum, Heinrich Joseph Denzinger, Edited by A
Schonmetzer, Barcelona, 1963
Looking for a Miracle, Joe Nickell, Prometheus Books, New York, 1993
Miracles, Rev Ronald A Knox, Catholic Truth Society, London, 1937
Miracles in Dispute, Ernst and Marie-Luise Keller, SCM Press Ltd, London, 1969
Lourdes, Antonio Bernardo, A. Doucet Publications, Lourdes, 1987
Medjugorje, David Baldwin, Catholic Truth Society, London, 2002
Miraculous Divine Healing, Connie W Adams, Guardian of Truth Publications, KY,
undated
New Catholic Encyclopaedia, The Catholic University of America and the
McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc, Washington, District of Columbia, 1967
Philosophy of Religion for A Level, Anne Jordan, Neil Lockyer and Edwin Tate,
Nelson Throne Ltd, Cheltenham, 2004
Raised From the Dead, Father Albert J Hebert SM, TAN, Illinois 1986
Science and the Paranormal, Edited by George O Abell and Barry Singer, Junction
Books, London, 1981
The Demon-Haunted World, Carl Sagan, Headline, London, 1997
The Book of Miracles, Stuart Gordon, Headline, London, 1996
The Case for Faith, Lee Strobel, Zondervan, Grand Rapids, Michigan, 2000
The Encyclopaedia of Unbelief Volume 1, Gordon Stein, Editor, Prometheus Books,
New York, 1985
The Hidden Power, Brian Inglis, Jonathan Cape, London, 1986
The Sceptical Occultist, Terry White, Century, London, 1994
The Stigmata and Modern Science, Rev Charles Carty, TAN, Illinois, 1974
Twenty Questions About Medjugorje, Kevin Orlin Johnson, Ph.D. Pangaeus Press,
Dallas, 1999
Why People Believe Weird Things, Michael Shermer, Freeman, New York, 1997
THE WEB
The Problem of Competing Claims by Richard Carrier
www.infidels.org/library/modern/richard_carrier/indef/4c.html