BIBLE, WRITTEN WORD OF GOD?
The Bible is a violent and spiritually pornographic collection of books
regarded by Christians as the word of God. It claims to have God’s actual words.
Christians when confronted with proof that the book has errors will start saying
that the parts that err are in fact symbolic so there are no errors. That is how
they get around the errors. It is a totally dishonest approach. As silly as the
Garden of Eden story is now, it made sense to the silly people of thousands of
years ago. The story was meant to be taken as literally true. It says nothing
that demands a metaphorical interpretation.
Christians habitually twist the Bible to make it tell them what they want to
hear. For example, Nebuchadnezzar and his men were predicted to do things to the
city of Tyre. However, some of it happened and the rest didn’t happen until the
time of Alexander the Great. Because Neb and Co didn’t do all the prophecy said,
the Christians pretended the prophecy was not just about them but also about
Alexander the Great and his armies. And this despite the fact that there is no
indication in the prophecy or from its context that they are right. The prophecy
mentions Neb and his men and then describes them as they or them without any
hint that they and them ever refer to anybody else. Words mean nothing to
Christians. The Bible Unearthed, Israel Finkelstein and Neil Asher Silberman,
Touchstone Books, New York, 2002 proves from archaeology that many of the Bible
stories are untrue and that its main characters may have been made up too.
The gospels say that Jesus told Peter how many times Peter would betray him and
this prophecy came true. Nobody denies the prophecy and its fulfilment was
written after the event. This is absolute proof that the gospels are not as
truthful as Christians would like us to believe. If a man wrote a book of
prophecies after the event you would say he was a fraud. No God would inspire
books like that. If we agree with the Christians that the gospels are right to
expect us to believe they are truthful despite the problem with those
prophecies, then we lose any right to complain that fortune-tellers are fakes if
they write that they made prophecies that came true without recording the
prophecies before the event. Jesus making such unimportant prophecies makes it
all look like magic and superstition.
Liberals say that the Bible is God's word only because he influenced the
writers. He did not tell them what words to write or put ideas in their heads
but influenced them without using direct supernatural power on them. This view
denies that the Bible is unique for it can't then be the only book that God
influenced. Also it denies that God is the author of the Bible. If DH Lawrence
was influenced by a lady he knew when he was writing Lady Chatterley's Lover
that does not make her the author. Roman Catholic teaching says that God
authored the Bible. So we must hold that God put the ideas in the minds of the
writers if we are to be Christians.
Some Christians like Keith Ward argue that the vindictive and evil laws of the
Bible are overridden by later laws which are kinder. They say this shows that
God was influencing his people to progress in understanding. God commanding
Israel to murder homosexuals by stoning is inexcusable. If God had to help the
stubborn world to progress then giving it violent scriptures was totally
unnecessary. You would need to be insane to believe the lies of people like
Ward.
Some say that Israel thought incorrectly that God wanted them to liquidate other
nations and then later understood that God wanted them to live in peace with
those nations. But that is the take of those Christians. It is just their
interpretation. By saying what they say, they are making their own guesses the
word of God.
The word canon means rule. The canon of the Bible is the list of the books that
belong in the Bible. The Catholic Bible is longer than the Protestant one for it
contains extra books such as Tobit and Sirach. The Council of Trent infallibly
decreed that these books belonged in the Bible. And this despite the fact that
Tobit has an Angel of God lying unnecessarily and Sirach commands the abuse of
women under the pretext of making them behave.
According to Sirach 42, a man has the right to lock up his wife to keep her from
committing adultery.
Daughters are not to be allowed to be friends with married women or to be
trusted with men. The author thinks that women think of nothing only sex.
Sirach commands that servants be beaten up for disobedience. Then, by
implication, wife beating is allowed.
Such books by no means can really be the word of God.
The ten commandments of the Jewish Law. Two of the commandments are,
“Remember that you keep the Sabbath day holy” and “You shall not commit
adultery”. Christians and Muslims accept these commandments as true. They were
reportedly dictated to Moses by God on Mount Sinai. A real God of love would
enlighten your thinking instead of giving you commands as if you were dirt.
Unnecessary commanding is evil and an act of intolerant violence. Revelation
from God in the sense of a Bible that you have to believe in is immoral and so
are miracles. The commandments show that God claims the right to be domineering
and so religion that represents him should be like that too. The commandments
are spiritual pornography. God has no need to command us to do right for it
commands itself. Therefore he has no right to.
Command means to force a person to do whether they want to or not and if they
refuse they are punished. So either way commanding is anti-freedom. It forces
you to obey and imposes penalties on you if you still firmly resist. To command
is to claim the right to force. Jesus said his command to us was to love one
another. God commanding you to care for others is ridiculous. If you have free
will, only you can decide to care and there is no point in anybody commanding
it. The master by command compels the slave to scrub the floor but he can’t make
the slave do it of her own free will. People only want God because they want to
bind society to certain rules and commands from God but at the root of all this
is suspicion, fear, anger and hatred. Only people who like violence like violent
bullying beliefs. That these beliefs are sugar-coated as in Christianity only
makes them sly as well. Belief in God is evil. We resent anybody commanding us
what to feel. It makes us bristle and so those who believe in God who want
others to believe will do so because they want others to feel this horrible
resentment too. God commanding us to love is a very serious error and shows that
he does not want us to understand what love really is. You cannot command love -
and what good is love unless it is spontaneous and is not carried out because of
a command or fear of retribution?
Jesus redefined love in a toxic way - if you want to do evil, set people up so
that evil will take root in them in a subtle way. Satan never was as vile as he
was. And we have seen the hypocrisy and lies and bloodletting that resulted.
Inspiration is the doctrine that though men wrote the Bible the way they wanted
it is as much God’s word as theirs and so it is both fully human in authorship
and fully divine. This is obviously contradictory nonsense. The Church says it
is not and that it is a mystery. Then why could I not be God the Father? Maybe
that is a mystery too! Only a book that was mechanically dictated by God could
be his word. Not even fundamentalists believe that the Bible was dictated with
the human writers being little more than typewriters. The Bible does show marks
of humanity such as bad sentence structure in places and bad descriptions and
vague teachings. When the Bible is not the word that means the Koran isn’t his
word either for it sees the Bible as its predecessor. So though the Koran claims
to have been dictated by an angel speaking for God it is not God’s word.
The claim that there is no error in the Bible and that its contradictions can be
solved is called inerrancy. Muslims say the same thing about the Koran and
Mormons about their scriptures. It is easier to believe there are contradictions
than to swallow the many improbable and bizarre solutions they offer for the
contradictions and the errors. All the so-called solutions are human
assumptions. God could arrange things so that it could be CLEARLY proved there
was a remarkable agreement that could only be explained by divine inspiration.
God failed to: meaning the books are not inspired at all. To believe in
inerrancy is to believe more in scholars and theologians who pretend to explain
away the errors than in the purported word of God.
The doctrine of Jesus - taught in the Bible - that people who will not repent
and believe in the word of God when they have the word of Moses and the Prophets
will not be convinced if anybody goes back to them from the dead in a miracle
implies that these books are more convincing than any miracle. This is total
madness. The books are not that convincing. (Obviously Jesus takes it for
granted that anybody with commonsense will agree with putting homosexuals and
adulterers to death as the Bible commands.) The books are not a miracle
themselves so a miracle would be more convincing. If Jesus is right then the
miracles the books testify to do not verify the books. It is absurd to consider
the books to be the word of God then.
The Bible in 2 Peter 1:16-21 says that the Old Testament is more sure even than
seeing Jesus transfigure and glow before your very eyes – that means total
infallibility for the Old Testament was taught by Jesus and the early Church.
Paul wrote that all of scripture is breathed out from the mouth of God (2
Timothy 3:16-17) and able to be complete for all who want to do the will of God.
The true Christian then will be a Fundamentalist. The view that the ideas not
the words of the Bible are inspired is rubbish. The ideas are inseparable from
the words. The view that the main truths is inspired is dishonest for that
leaves you free to pick and choose what you like. While it is true that for
Christians only Jesus Christ is the word of God and infallible, he is supposed
to be the supernatural author of the Bible so it is his voice. Jesus alone being
the word doesn’t mean the Bible can be treated as containing error.
It means that something has to be treated as error free and invested with God's
truth.
Jesus then leads to notions about infallible Bibles and we all know what happens when people think they have the truth and others do not.