AUTOCREATION - IF SOMETHING CAN CREATE A UNIVERSE COULD IT BE SOMETHING AUTOMATIC AS OPPOSED TO AN AGENT/ACTOR?
Asking why there is something rather than nothing presumes “nothing” is the
natural state of things out of which “something” needs an explanation. The
explanation that it is God ultimately means that something non-material that has
no parts commanded all things to exist and they did. But natural state is the
wrong expression totally. We are really talking about default not natural. It is
not natural that one and one are two. It is a default and it looks natural for
nature follows the rule. It is really following a default.
We need a better question. We need a new question. Why is there physical rather
than immaterial (spiritual is another word for immaterial or what has no
material components)? That is way clearer and more accurate. That question
presumes non-material is the default state of things out of which physical needs
an explanation.
Non-material cannot be the default for we have no way of testing if there is
such a thing. If we think thoughts are like spirits or non-material things that
does not prove that something non-material started off the universe or that
people without components can exist. We don’t really know why thoughts seem to
have no components but we have no evidence that they do not.
The answer to the questions is that there was always something in some form and
that something is now the universe.
People want creation out of nothing – ex nihilo. If that is when they want then
then why not auto-creation out of nothing? Why that as opposed to agent-creation
out of nothing where the agent causes the universe to exist? Neither one is
understandable and it has to be admitted that both make no sense. But you still
have to choose one or the other.
What is a God then if God does not make right and wrong out of nothing? Religion
says he does not make right and wrong for he is simply right by nature and wrong
is what does not agree with him. Being divine then is just about absolute
independence and needing nothing. It is self-reliance or self-sufficiency. If
you worship God for that then you need to rethink a lot. To worship God for his
love is to worship that aspect but it is not worshipping what makes him God! It is
idolatry and about what you want from him not him.