LOURDES, FATIMA AND MEDJUGORJE ARE FRAUDS
The Catholic Church investigated the apparitions of Mary the Mother of Jesus at Lourdes and Fatima. It accepted them as real apparitions. Medjugorje has been condemned by the Church.
Now an apparition may be a fraud by the
witness, her or his supporters and verifiers, or both.
The investigation of the apparitions is unscientific in the extreme. No effort
is made to show that the lady seen looks the same in the apparitions. Mary is
pale in some apparitions. Has rosy cheeks in others. And she has brown skin in
others. Her hair colour ranges from light brown to black. The height changes too
from apparition to apparition. Mary supposedly left a miracle painting of
herself at Guadulupe in Mexico and the Church accepts it as a true miracle. It
is never shown to alleged visionaries. They are never queried, "Is this the
woman you see?" The Church just assumes that Mary gives herself a head and body
transplant every time she appears. The Church never compares the lingo and
characteristics of an apparition it is investigating to the lingo and
characteristics of accepted apparitions. Yet that is necessary to see if the
same person is appearing. So Mary changes personalities too! Commonsense would
suggest that it is a different being appearing in different apparition sites and
claiming to be Mary. If the apostles were seeing a vision claiming to be of the
resurrected Jesus who didn't talk and look the same as in life then one can
question if the being really is who he says he is. It is ridiculous to imagine
Mary having to do miracles to show that it is her appearing when all she has to
do is stick to the same mannerisms, personality, vocabulary and bodily
appearance in her apparitions. Why change? If Mary changes herself so much then
why does she bother visiting anybody and not send an angel or something? Her
changing all the time downgrades the standard. A low standard of evidence for
the supernatural is very useful to the likes of Mormon Prophet Joseph Smith who
have to counterfeit miracles to get followers. Her reluctance to appear as a
Jewess with dark skin is perturbing and did nothing to mitigate Roman
Catholicism's hysterical anti-semitism. It looks like homage paid to the racism
of that cult. How Mary is a Mary who appears as a Caucasian?
Marian apparitions almost always induce a state of ecstasy upon the witnesses.
The witnesses hardly blink during the vision and stare upwards in a trancelike
state. They say they are enraptured in joy. But there is no authority for
ecstasy at all in the Bible. The resurrection witnesses did not claim - as far
as we know - to have gone into such a trance. Paul speaks of visions but does
not mention the trance. Jesus said we must do all the good we do to give God joy
and do it only for him. He is the ultimate value. Marian ecstasy have people
finding intense happiness in the presence of the Virgin and their focus is on
her alone. Thus the ecstasy is a sign that if the apparition is supernatural
then it is not from God.
Lourdes is the most popular Marian Shrine in the world. There Mary allegedly
appeared to St Bernadette in 1858 and since then there has been alleged miracles
of healing that have been accepted as real by the Church. Lourdes is possibly
the only reported Marian apparition site that is worth investigating for unlike
Fatima and La Salette and other apparitions, there are first-hand critical
reports of the happenings.
Most people these days accept that religion should exist to fulfil human needs.
In other words, religion should be formulated in a way that helps people best.
Of course Jesus who said that we must love God above all and must love ourselves
and others in second place disagreed but let us ignore his fanaticism. His God
was lawgiver. Laws have to be obeyed whether they are good laws or not so we are
expected to obey God meekly even if what he commands seems evil to us. We know
the consequences when religions start putting themselves before people and even
their own members. We won’t tolerate that any more not even if we are members of
religion ourselves. If you put people first then you must take them to Lourdes
demanding a miracle to help them. But Lourdes implies that this attitude is
evil. God heals who he will. So the alleged healings are only superficially
humanitarian. They are more concerned about bolstering a spiritual agenda that
degrades people. Believers will have to ask themselves if sixty something
healings at Lourdes justify a message going to millions and influencing them
that urges that religion matters more than human beings.
This apparition attracted people to an infectious dump and had them drinking
from a spring there. An apparition that had not been checked out by the Church
and authenticated had no right to have people doing that even if she was going
to protect them for they had insufficient evidence that she was going to. Even a
vision accepted as true by the Church would have no right. the Church claims
that she has the right to change her mind for she only permits belief in visions
and doesn’t command belief in them. This shows that if anything appeared it was
not Mary. The spring was of allegedly miraculous origin but now the Church
admits that it was there all the time Church (page 87, The Appearances of the
Blessed Virgin at the Grotto of Lourdes). Many of the healing miracles that have
been accepted by the Church are unconvincing when looked at up close (page 177,
Believing in God).
Extra-ordinary claims require at least, as in hard evidence at the very
least. Miracle believers deny this. Murders happen and yet we demand a huge pile
of evidence before jailing killers for murders are out of the ordinary. Miracles
are more uncommon than murders and the same quantity of evidence would be no
good for verifying them. Believers demand extraordinary evidence for
extraordinary miracles they don’t like such as Buddha’s enlightenment but they
don’t for the miracles that suit their religious preferences! The evidence they
present is only an excuse. They would believe without it. Miracles invariably
induce blind faith and blind faith is only good for bigotry and dishonesty and
blindness. Not very godly are they?
The Church claimed to authenticate that Mary appeared to Bernadette. It did not.
What it authenticated (leave aside the question about whether the authenticating
is of any validity) was that Bernadette was having trances that couldn’t be
explained by doctors and that a spring appeared and that healings took place.
None of this proves that Bernadette really saw Mary. She might have lied or
misunderstood. Or the vision might only have been pretending to be Mary. She may
have went into a miraculous trance that affected her brain to make her imagine
she saw the Virgin Mary. For the Church to say that it authenticated the
apparitions of Mary at Lourdes is simply for it to lie. So here we have an
extraordinary claim, that Mary appeared for which there is little evidence if
you want to be generous. But the truth is there is NO evidence at all. So the
miracles of Lourdes if they are sent to support the claims of a religion did
nothing only support lies. We know that the stranger or more unlikely the claim,
the evidence needs to be of a standard and strength to match the strangeness of
the claim. The evidence needs to be in proportion to the level of
unbelievableness of the claim. You don’t need the same evidence that Charlie met
Annie at Loch Ness that you need to justify believing that Charlie saw the
monster there. Lourdes and all the accepted Catholic apparitions deny this truth
and so are evil and trying to drag us into superstition.
Fatima was allegedly visited by Mary in 1917 when she was reported to have
appeared by three children two of whom died a few years later. The vision
climaxed in the Miracle of the Sun in which a vast crowd is supposed to have
witnessed a solar miracle in which the sun changed colour and seemed to some to
come down below the clouds. There are so few accounts of this miracle that we
can safely say it is unimpressive and mass hysteria and lies can explain it for
no two witnesses saw the same thing. When you look at the sun you are bound to
see some strange things for it is so scary to do that and it is so bright. The
trigger that caused them to focus on the sun was Lucia telling them to put their
umbrellas down.
Like the Lourdes vision, this one predicted eternal salvation for the
visionaries. An apparition has no right to do that for it is not as certain as
the faith for the Church allows people to disbelieve in apparitions if they wish
while they are not allowed to doubt the creed. The miracles then suggest that
they are equal to the authority of the Church in which case they contradict the
faith of the Church and are heretical and the Devil is doing them.
The visions of Fatima have chief visionary Lucia alone testifying to most of
what happened during the visions and what the lady said and she certainly much
of this seems to have been forgotten by her until the 1940’s. The important
stuff did not surface until then, which suggests fraud. She had clearly fooled
the previous commissions of investigation by not telling all and they cannot do
their job properly unless they hear it all and yet her apparitions claim was
accepted as valid by the Church by then. So we have one unreliable witness to
spiritual events and we are taught to believe that divine truth is the most
important thing there is. The God of the Bible forbids this reliance on one
person and even more so in the ultimate matters (Deuteronomy 19:15). This shows
that only the Devil could have appeared at Fatima and to Bernadette at Lourdes.
The Fatima Lady promised a strange light would appear to show that the next
world war was near. The light never appeared but Lucia had to make do with an
Aurora Boralis – a natural event! The Lady meant something supernatural for
natural strange lights have been with us all the time. Lucia was a liar.
Deuteronomy 18 says that anybody who makes true prophecies in the name of God
and gets one wrong is a fake. Her lady is a fake then for making an unimpressive
prophecy.
The three super-shrines of the Catholic Church have been covered. And all of
them have been found wanting. They report healing miracles which need a team of
experts to examine them. Even if the experts declare something a possible
miracle the Church might not. Christians have pointed out that Jesus' miracles
were so obvious that no investigation team was needed. That is why they think
the Catholic miracles are hoaxes, based on mistakes or are satanic trickery.
The Church itself teaches that most apparition claims are probably not from God.
Apparitions such as Medjugorje and Garabandal have caused huge trouble for the
Church as has many others. Clearly it is best not to pay much attention to
apparitions at all!