Is there an alternative to unconditional election doctrine?
ALTERNATIVES TO CALVINISM
Jacob Arminius who was born in 1560 in Holland questioned the Five Points of
Calvinism causing a big division in Protestantism.
Arminians and Calvinists agree that salvation is by faith alone. Roman Catholics
and these two factions all agree that justification and salvation are gifts from
God which cannot be earned by good works (Romans 6:23).
Calvinists were convinced that all who are saved have been caused to choose
salvation by God and could not resist it. Arminians said that God does not cause
this decision but merely influences it by grace so that the person can resist
the grace.
Calvinists said that God chose to save some and not all. He does not intend to
save everybody.
Arminians said that he chose to save only those who choose to believe him but
intends to save all and can’t save all for they will not come to him for
salvation.
Arminianism holds that God looks into the future and foresees that some will
obey and chooses them for salvation because of their holy works and because they
choose him. Yet they say salvation is by faith alone. You might do the good
works after you are saved but they got you your salvation so it is a doctrine of
salvation by works. Some say salvation is conditional on choice and not on
works. But choice is a work. It is something you do. God’s past decision cannot
be caused by the future. He cannot predestine you for salvation because he sees
you will do good works if you are saved. The future cannot determine the past
for the past is meant to give way to the present and the present give away to
the future and that order cannot be altered. Therefore he is just seeing what
you will do and because of that he can choose you before he even makes you but
there is no predestination conditional or unconditional. Arminians must face
then the Bible texts that speak of us being chosen before the world was made.
Only Calvinists can make sense of them.
Calvinists said that humanity is wholly sinful and unable to turn to God for
salvation. Arminians said that it is true that all are completely sinful but
denied that all could not repent and be saved.
Calvinists claimed that Jesus did not die to atone for the sins of those who are
not chosen while Arminius stupidly said he did.
Calvinists said that the saved would persevere in the faith forever and
Arminianism is not so sure about this. It is agnostic.
Many but not all Arminians hold that once you are saved you are always saved. So
do Calvinists.
Arminianism is closer to Roman Catholicism.
But unlike Catholicism it believes that faith is enough – or that it is enough
to believe and repent once while turning to the blood of Christ for salvation.
Catholics say it is only enough if you can’t do good works. The Catholic is
saved by faith alone until it is time to do good works and then you are saved by
both. It often says that all sin is mortal contrary to Roman Catholicism.
Arminianism teaches the legal fiction theory that Jesus’ obedience is credited
to the sinner’s account and the sinner’s to Jesus’. This denies Rome’s doctrine
that you always lose God when you sin seriously.
Anyway, God to be God has to be sovereign and thus he is far more responsible
for a sinner going to Hell than a sinner could be for he is creator.
Unconditional election and God go together. The doctrine when added to the
belief that there is a place of everlasting punishment after death for many
becomes inhuman.