BIBLE ARCHEOLOGY: BUT IT AIN’T NECESSARILY SO
It Ain’t Necessarily So, Investigating the Truth of the Biblical Past, Matthew
Sturgis, Headline Books, London, 2001
This book cannot be recommended enough. It explores the most up to date
archaeological evidence that the Bible contains much that is untrue.
The Bible claim that the Israelites were not Canaanites has been disproven (page
8, 111-113).
The conquest of Canaan as spelled out in the Bible where Joshua led the people of Israel to successful war against Canaan is likewise false (page 8).
The shared DNA between Israelites and Palestinians today may point to a common origin in Canaan (page 11). Israel means fighter for El and is a Canaanite word (page 117). El was top Canaanite god and Israel had been worshipping Yahweh and his wife Asherah in the 8th century BC (page 13, 117).
The list of Edomite kings in Genesis 36 makes the error of naming kings who lived long after Moses which conflicts with tradition that Moses wrote Genesis (page 22).
Jericho was destroyed 150 years before the coming of
Joshua. The story from the Bible that he destroyed it is false (page 62). There
is no evidence that the city was even occupied at the time of Joshua (page 64).
“Almost everyone” agrees that the Jericho story from the Bible is false (page
64). Worse, Canaan at the time was very likely to be a province of Egypt at the
time (page 69). It even had unwalled cities, so sure were the people that Egypt
always be able to protect them. Cuneiform tablets from those times discovered in
1889 give proof that Egypt stepped in to look after Canaan and restore stability
(page 69). This refutes the Bible claim that Israel escaped slavery from Egypt
by going to Canaan and that it fought the Canaanites in Canaan not the
Egyptians. The Israelites after they left Egypt are supposed to have settled for
a while at Kadesh but not a shred of evidence for this has been uncovered (page
72). The story of the Exodus from Egypt and the conquest of Canaan by Joshua
is pure myth for most scholars (page 74). Even the Holy City, Jerusalem, its
name comes from the Canaanite god, Shalem (page 137).
King David was one of the central characters in the Bible and Jesus, according
to the New Testament, claimed he was a David and his successor as King and his
descendant. Hardly anything indicating that David ever lived has ever been found
and items thought to back up the Bible account have been re-ascribed by scholars
(page 145). He had a rags to riches existence in the Bible. His grand capital
city Jerusalem was merely a small village (page 146). The Bible lies that it was
his splendid royal headquarters. The presence of the Philistines and the poor
evidence for David in comparison has led many scholars to doubt the existence of
David (page 159).
An inscription speaking of the house of David about 100
years after David’s time is used by some as evidence for the existence of David
(page 164). Many scholars think that the inscription is speaking of a placename
not the house of David. Another inscription is disputed as well. Scholars by
guessing the missing letters have worked out that they think it refers to the
house of David as well (page 169).
The Bible boasts and brags about the great buildings and super-weatlh and great
alliances of King Solomon and yet the evidence for all this so bad that at the
present time unless new evidence comes up Solomon must be taken for a myth (page
207).
That God failed to preserve archaeological evidence very well for his Bible
surely says that it is the word of man not God?