The Selfless Gene, Living with God and Darwin
Charles Foster,
Hodder & Stoughton, London, 2009
The Selfless Gene says
The eye is not perfect and indeed the eye is not as well designed as it could
be. If you believe in evolution you would expect this for evolution depends on
making the best of what is there. The creationists object that God is a
consummate artist and likes to use versatile techniques but the eye is not
designed how a human being for example would design it so that idea of theirs is
out (page 50, 51).
The Truth is: I agree. Creationists are saying that what looks like the work of
evolution is deceptive for it is God behind it not evolution. This is no better
than the idea that the earth is only a few thousand years old despite the
evidence that it is astronomically older than that. Some creationists believe in
the apparent age theory which teaches that God made the world look older than
what it is.
The Selfless Gene says
There is much evidence that we are born with the tendency to adopt religious
belief. One example of this evidence is how children seem to be inclined towards
religious belief. It is as if their religious tendencies are unlearned and
innate but may be lost as the children get older (page 115).
The Truth is: It is more accurate to say that children have a liking for faith
in magic and magical beings such as witches and fairies. To make children pray
and to urge them to believe in God instead of magic and witches and ghosts and
fairies is ch
The Selfless Gene says
Genesis says that God gave green plants as food for man and all the animals but
evolution and science contradicts this. There never were vegetarian lions. The
Bible says that God made man and all animals and the creation and said that it
was good. We reject the view that God only meant it was good in the sense that
it works for he didn't say it works but that it is good. Science says creation
was never good - it was always one animal ripping another apart.
The Selfless Gene says
St Augustine taught that animals cannot reason like we can and so God gave them
to us to use them in their lives and death. St Thomas Aquinas taught that it is
not wrong for man to use animals by killing them or using them in anyway way we
want. The Jesuit Theologian Joseph Rickaby taught that animals have no rights
for they are not persons and so we can abuse them if we wish for they have as
many rights as sticks and stones do and that is none! (page 147)
The Truth is, The Selfless Gene sees arrogance and callousness in such
teachings. It says their beliefs contradict Genesis 2 which claims that God
brought animals to Adam as friends. The Selfless Gene points out how chimps and
dolphins and New Caledonian Crows seem to be conscious beings.
The book says that if animals are not conscious but sentient that does not
justify hurting them. Consciousness is being aware that A has passed away and B
is happening now and C is to come (page 149). Sentience is merely when an
earthworm feels a needle for example . It is just physical. Consciousness is more
than physical it is mental too.
The Selfless Gene says
It is a problem how Jesus could be the perfect son of God when he at ate the
lamb at Passover, told the disciples how to hurt and kill fish by fishing,
cooked fish after his resurrection for the disciples, worshipped in the
bloodbath of the Temple, never said a bad word against the sacrificial system,
magically killed loads of pigs to make a point and so on (page 156).
The Selfless Gene says
Paul declares in Romans 5 that sin (he uses the word paraptoma which means
mistake - not an immoral action) came into the world through one man and death
came through sin and death spread to all because all sinned. Foster says that
this depicts the fall as a gate and says that we are individually responsible
because we all sinned. He says that Romans 5 does not actually say that this
death is physical death. It could be spiritual death.
The Selfless Gene says
Foster rejects the idea that it a helps to people when they believe God is when
them when they suffer and that he suffers with them too. He says that it makes
no difference when something bad happens to you (page 175).
The Selfless Gene says
Foster says that you will have to hate the body if you want to believe our
destiny is to be disembodied beings in Heaven forever (page 187). He argues that
the magical body of Jesus that can go through walls etc is MORE material than
our bodies are and that God will make all things more material not less when he
saves the universe and re-creates it. He says that this is taught in the Bible
metaphor of earth being wedded to Heaven and in the idea of all things being
reconciled to God (page 187).
The Selfless Gene says
Page 209 says that the fall of Adam and Eve was caused by them coming to their
own conclusions about things and not depending on the word of God. God told them
not to eat of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil. The serpent comes
along and asks Eve if God told her not to eat of any tree in the garden? Foster
says he is exaggerating for God never banned the eating of all trees. Eve
instead of saying no tells the serpent that he forbade the eating of the tree in
the middle of the garden or touch it. She forgot what tree she was forbidden to
eat. She made it up then that it was the tree of life she was forbidden to eat.
She took the fruit of the forbidden tree and gave it to her husband and caused a
disaster for all mankind.
The Truth says: Foster is actually right. The story indicates that we must not
depend on reason or memory alone but on the word of God. This means that anyone
who makes up their own mind and does not refer to the bible and obey it is
another Adam or Eve - or worse for Adam and Eve didn't see the consequences.
MY LAST WORD
Richard Dawkins says that genes do get organisms to behave in unselfish ways so
that the genes can ensure they will survive at the expense of other beings. If
that is so, then unselfish people are just tools in a scheme where the forces of
selfishness are taking advantage of them. Even unselfish is selfish when
it is all weighed up.
Interestingly, the argument against the selfish gene is that brothers and
sisters have the same percentage of genes as your children and yet you will
sacrifice a brother or sister for your child. You will even lose more genes by
sacrificing a brother and sister both for your child! Religion celebrates that
as being God’s plan. But it is obvious that somehow we are working against how
we are designed. It’s a strange plan. There are brutal errors in how things are
organised and often that goes over our heads for we battle nature and normalise
the triumph. It is certainly a godless gene!
DNA is not struggling to exist. It just
exists or it does not. So DNA molecules cannot be described as
selfish or self-centered or ruthless. They are not unselfish
either.