Miracles & Faith & Hope
Religion, religion based on miracles in particular,
claims to help people by giving them hope no matter how bad their lives have
been or how bad it looks that they will be. This contradicts religion's promise
that if we think of God and others not ourselves we will be happy or at least no
unhappier than what we are. This means we have to hope for other people not
ourselves. An atheist can do that so what do we need religion and religious
faith for?
The teaching of hoping in God implies that even if this
is not the best of all possible worlds, then God intends it to be. God cannot
know exactly what would have happened in Toronto in 1971 if John F Kennedy had
not been murdered in Dallas. Knowing all things does not mean that God cannot
guess. The evil thing about teaching that this universe is intended to be the
best possible universe is that it endorses complacency.
Some believers in healings have false hope. A person who
allegedly gets a miracle healing at Lourdes will feel cured. But many of these
people are considered even by the Church to have been cured by natural factors
and not God's intervention. Miracle claims give such people false hope that they
have received a miracle. That is cruel. No happiness got at Lourdes is worth it
when vulnerable people get a slap in the face.
The Catholic Church by operating shrines of miraculous
healing such as that at Lourdes or Fatima has come under fire for giving false
hope to the sick. The Church replies that the chance of a miracle is so remote
that this accusation is false. Then where are the disclaimers in Lourdes for
example?
If a mother is dying of cancer and has no desire want to leave her little children,
the argument that a miracle is very unlikely will have no significance
emotionally or otherwise. She will get her hopes
up for emotion not reason will be in charge. The woman will be devastated and
crippled with disappointment. She will naturally feel that if miracles are rare,
she is a special case and has a good chance of getting better. Desperation will
make her feel that. And the Church says that God is responsible even for all the
non-miraculous healings that take place at such shrines so the woman will
believe that if she does not get a miracle healing, God will provide that she
will be healed without a miracle. So her hopes will be strong. The Church tells
us to hope in God so it has no business pretending it will not and does not give false
hope to the sick at Lourdes and Fatima.
Many people cured by miracle say they felt that something special was going to
happen. The Church teaches that God communicates with the soul. A lot of Lourdes
pilgrims must sense that God will heal them miraculously. But it won't happen.
The Church then is to blame for encouraging the most vulnerable of people to set
themselves up for a disappointment.
Finally
Believers are told that real miracles are very rare. Thus
religion thinks it gets out of the charge that it is dishing out false hope to
vulnerable people. But those people are told that God inspires them and guides
them. If you are desperate enough you will easily feel that God is calling you
to Lourdes to experience a miracle healing. The improbability of a miracle will
not stop you feeling it can and will happen to you. Religion is setting them up
for false hope.
Further Reading ~
Answers to Tough Questions, Josh McDowell and Don
Stewart, Scripture Press, Bucks, 1980
A Summary of Christian Doctrine, Louis Berkhof, The Banner of Truth Trust,
London, 1971
Believing in God, PJ McGrath, Wolfhound Press, Dublin, 1995
Catechism of the Catholic Church, Veritas, Dublin, 1995
Catholicism and Fundamentalism, Karl Keating, Ignatius Press, San Francisco,
1988
Enchiridion Symbolorum Et Definitionum, Heinrich Joseph Denzinger, Edited by A
Schonmetzer, Barcelona, 1963
Looking for a Miracle, Joe Nickell, Prometheus Books, New York, 1993
Miracles, Rev Ronald A Knox, Catholic Truth Society, London, 1937
Miracles in Dispute, Ernst and Marie-Luise Keller, SCM Press Ltd, London, 1969
Lourdes, Antonio Bernardo, A. Doucet Publications, Lourdes, 1987
Medjugorje, David Baldwin, Catholic Truth Society, London, 2002
Miraculous Divine Healing, Connie W Adams, Guardian of Truth Publications, KY,
undated
New Catholic Encyclopaedia, The Catholic University of America and the
McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc, Washington, District of Columbia, 1967
Raised From the Dead, Father Albert J Hebert SM, TAN, Illinois 1986
Science and the Paranormal, Edited by George O Abell and Barry Singer, Junction
Books, London, 1981
The Demon-Haunted World, Carl Sagan, Headline, London, 1997
The Book of Miracles, Stuart Gordon, Headline, London, 1996
The Encyclopaedia of Unbelief Volume 1, Gordon Stein, Editor, Prometheus Books,
New York, 1985
The Hidden Power, Brian Inglis, Jonathan Cape, London, 1986
The Sceptical Occultist, Terry White, Century, London, 1994
The Stigmata and Modern Science, Rev Charles Carty, TAN, Illinois, 1974
Twenty Questions About Medjugorje, Kevin Orlin Johnson, Ph.D. Pangaeus Press,
Dallas, 1999
Why People Believe Weird Things, Michael Shermer, Freeman, New York, 1997
THE WEB
The Problem of Competing Claims by Richard Carrier
www.infidels.org/library/modern/richard_carrier/indef/4c.html